Cargando…

Stressors Length and the Habituation Effect—An EEG Study

The research described in this paper aimed to determine whether people respond differently to short and long stimuli and whether stress stimuli repeated over time evoke a habituation effect. To meet this goal, we performed a cognitive experiment with eight subjects. During this experiment, the subje...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rejer, Izabela, Wacewicz, Daniel, Schab, Mateusz, Romanowski, Bartosz, Łukasiewicz, Kacper, Maciaszczyk, Michał
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9505843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36146211
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22186862
_version_ 1784796574403002368
author Rejer, Izabela
Wacewicz, Daniel
Schab, Mateusz
Romanowski, Bartosz
Łukasiewicz, Kacper
Maciaszczyk, Michał
author_facet Rejer, Izabela
Wacewicz, Daniel
Schab, Mateusz
Romanowski, Bartosz
Łukasiewicz, Kacper
Maciaszczyk, Michał
author_sort Rejer, Izabela
collection PubMed
description The research described in this paper aimed to determine whether people respond differently to short and long stimuli and whether stress stimuli repeated over time evoke a habituation effect. To meet this goal, we performed a cognitive experiment with eight subjects. During this experiment, the subjects were presented with two trays of stress-inducing stimuli (different in length) interlaced with the main tasks. The mean beta power calculated from the EEG signal recorded from the two prefrontal electrodes (Fp1 and Fp2) was used as a stress index. The main results are as follows: (i) we confirmed the previous finding that beta power assessed from the EEG signal recorded from prefrontal electrodes is significantly higher for the STRESS condition compared to NON-STRESS condition; (ii) we found a significant difference in beta power between STRESS conditions that differed in length—the beta power was four times higher for short, compared to long, stress-inducing stimuli; (iii) we did not find enough evidence to confirm (or reject) the hypothesis that stress stimuli repeated over time evoke the habituation effect; although the general trends aggregated over subjects and stressors were negative, their slopes were not statistically significant; moreover, there was no agreement among subjects with respect to the slope of individual trends.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9505843
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95058432022-09-24 Stressors Length and the Habituation Effect—An EEG Study Rejer, Izabela Wacewicz, Daniel Schab, Mateusz Romanowski, Bartosz Łukasiewicz, Kacper Maciaszczyk, Michał Sensors (Basel) Article The research described in this paper aimed to determine whether people respond differently to short and long stimuli and whether stress stimuli repeated over time evoke a habituation effect. To meet this goal, we performed a cognitive experiment with eight subjects. During this experiment, the subjects were presented with two trays of stress-inducing stimuli (different in length) interlaced with the main tasks. The mean beta power calculated from the EEG signal recorded from the two prefrontal electrodes (Fp1 and Fp2) was used as a stress index. The main results are as follows: (i) we confirmed the previous finding that beta power assessed from the EEG signal recorded from prefrontal electrodes is significantly higher for the STRESS condition compared to NON-STRESS condition; (ii) we found a significant difference in beta power between STRESS conditions that differed in length—the beta power was four times higher for short, compared to long, stress-inducing stimuli; (iii) we did not find enough evidence to confirm (or reject) the hypothesis that stress stimuli repeated over time evoke the habituation effect; although the general trends aggregated over subjects and stressors were negative, their slopes were not statistically significant; moreover, there was no agreement among subjects with respect to the slope of individual trends. MDPI 2022-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9505843/ /pubmed/36146211 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22186862 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Rejer, Izabela
Wacewicz, Daniel
Schab, Mateusz
Romanowski, Bartosz
Łukasiewicz, Kacper
Maciaszczyk, Michał
Stressors Length and the Habituation Effect—An EEG Study
title Stressors Length and the Habituation Effect—An EEG Study
title_full Stressors Length and the Habituation Effect—An EEG Study
title_fullStr Stressors Length and the Habituation Effect—An EEG Study
title_full_unstemmed Stressors Length and the Habituation Effect—An EEG Study
title_short Stressors Length and the Habituation Effect—An EEG Study
title_sort stressors length and the habituation effect—an eeg study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9505843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36146211
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22186862
work_keys_str_mv AT rejerizabela stressorslengthandthehabituationeffectaneegstudy
AT wacewiczdaniel stressorslengthandthehabituationeffectaneegstudy
AT schabmateusz stressorslengthandthehabituationeffectaneegstudy
AT romanowskibartosz stressorslengthandthehabituationeffectaneegstudy
AT łukasiewiczkacper stressorslengthandthehabituationeffectaneegstudy
AT maciaszczykmichał stressorslengthandthehabituationeffectaneegstudy