Cargando…
Systematic Evaluation of Voriconazole Pharmacokinetic Models without Pharmacogenetic Information for Bayesian Forecasting in Critically Ill Patients
Voriconazole (VRC) is used as first line antifungal agent against invasive aspergillosis. Model-based approaches might optimize VRC therapy. This study aimed to investigate the predictive performance of pharmacokinetic models of VRC without pharmacogenetic information for their suitability for model...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9505877/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36145667 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14091920 |
_version_ | 1784796582987694080 |
---|---|
author | Kallee, Simon Scharf, Christina Schatz, Lea Marie Paal, Michael Vogeser, Michael Irlbeck, Michael Zander, Johannes Zoller, Michael Liebchen, Uwe |
author_facet | Kallee, Simon Scharf, Christina Schatz, Lea Marie Paal, Michael Vogeser, Michael Irlbeck, Michael Zander, Johannes Zoller, Michael Liebchen, Uwe |
author_sort | Kallee, Simon |
collection | PubMed |
description | Voriconazole (VRC) is used as first line antifungal agent against invasive aspergillosis. Model-based approaches might optimize VRC therapy. This study aimed to investigate the predictive performance of pharmacokinetic models of VRC without pharmacogenetic information for their suitability for model-informed precision dosing. Seven PopPK models were selected from a systematic literature review. A total of 66 measured VRC plasma concentrations from 33 critically ill patients was employed for analysis. The second measurement per patient was used to calculate relative Bias (rBias), mean error (ME), relative root mean squared error (rRMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) (i) only based on patient characteristics and dosing history (a priori) and (ii) integrating the first measured concentration to predict the second concentration (Bayesian forecasting). The a priori rBias/ME and rRMSE/MAE varied substantially between the models, ranging from −15.4 to 124.6%/−0.70 to 8.01 mg/L and from 89.3 to 139.1%/1.45 to 8.11 mg/L, respectively. The integration of the first TDM sample improved the predictive performance of all models, with the model by Chen (85.0%) showing the best predictive performance (rRMSE: 85.0%; rBias: 4.0%). Our study revealed a certain degree of imprecision for all investigated models, so their sole use is not recommendable. Models with a higher performance would be necessary for clinical use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9505877 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95058772022-09-24 Systematic Evaluation of Voriconazole Pharmacokinetic Models without Pharmacogenetic Information for Bayesian Forecasting in Critically Ill Patients Kallee, Simon Scharf, Christina Schatz, Lea Marie Paal, Michael Vogeser, Michael Irlbeck, Michael Zander, Johannes Zoller, Michael Liebchen, Uwe Pharmaceutics Article Voriconazole (VRC) is used as first line antifungal agent against invasive aspergillosis. Model-based approaches might optimize VRC therapy. This study aimed to investigate the predictive performance of pharmacokinetic models of VRC without pharmacogenetic information for their suitability for model-informed precision dosing. Seven PopPK models were selected from a systematic literature review. A total of 66 measured VRC plasma concentrations from 33 critically ill patients was employed for analysis. The second measurement per patient was used to calculate relative Bias (rBias), mean error (ME), relative root mean squared error (rRMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) (i) only based on patient characteristics and dosing history (a priori) and (ii) integrating the first measured concentration to predict the second concentration (Bayesian forecasting). The a priori rBias/ME and rRMSE/MAE varied substantially between the models, ranging from −15.4 to 124.6%/−0.70 to 8.01 mg/L and from 89.3 to 139.1%/1.45 to 8.11 mg/L, respectively. The integration of the first TDM sample improved the predictive performance of all models, with the model by Chen (85.0%) showing the best predictive performance (rRMSE: 85.0%; rBias: 4.0%). Our study revealed a certain degree of imprecision for all investigated models, so their sole use is not recommendable. Models with a higher performance would be necessary for clinical use. MDPI 2022-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9505877/ /pubmed/36145667 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14091920 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kallee, Simon Scharf, Christina Schatz, Lea Marie Paal, Michael Vogeser, Michael Irlbeck, Michael Zander, Johannes Zoller, Michael Liebchen, Uwe Systematic Evaluation of Voriconazole Pharmacokinetic Models without Pharmacogenetic Information for Bayesian Forecasting in Critically Ill Patients |
title | Systematic Evaluation of Voriconazole Pharmacokinetic Models without Pharmacogenetic Information for Bayesian Forecasting in Critically Ill Patients |
title_full | Systematic Evaluation of Voriconazole Pharmacokinetic Models without Pharmacogenetic Information for Bayesian Forecasting in Critically Ill Patients |
title_fullStr | Systematic Evaluation of Voriconazole Pharmacokinetic Models without Pharmacogenetic Information for Bayesian Forecasting in Critically Ill Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic Evaluation of Voriconazole Pharmacokinetic Models without Pharmacogenetic Information for Bayesian Forecasting in Critically Ill Patients |
title_short | Systematic Evaluation of Voriconazole Pharmacokinetic Models without Pharmacogenetic Information for Bayesian Forecasting in Critically Ill Patients |
title_sort | systematic evaluation of voriconazole pharmacokinetic models without pharmacogenetic information for bayesian forecasting in critically ill patients |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9505877/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36145667 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14091920 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kalleesimon systematicevaluationofvoriconazolepharmacokineticmodelswithoutpharmacogeneticinformationforbayesianforecastingincriticallyillpatients AT scharfchristina systematicevaluationofvoriconazolepharmacokineticmodelswithoutpharmacogeneticinformationforbayesianforecastingincriticallyillpatients AT schatzleamarie systematicevaluationofvoriconazolepharmacokineticmodelswithoutpharmacogeneticinformationforbayesianforecastingincriticallyillpatients AT paalmichael systematicevaluationofvoriconazolepharmacokineticmodelswithoutpharmacogeneticinformationforbayesianforecastingincriticallyillpatients AT vogesermichael systematicevaluationofvoriconazolepharmacokineticmodelswithoutpharmacogeneticinformationforbayesianforecastingincriticallyillpatients AT irlbeckmichael systematicevaluationofvoriconazolepharmacokineticmodelswithoutpharmacogeneticinformationforbayesianforecastingincriticallyillpatients AT zanderjohannes systematicevaluationofvoriconazolepharmacokineticmodelswithoutpharmacogeneticinformationforbayesianforecastingincriticallyillpatients AT zollermichael systematicevaluationofvoriconazolepharmacokineticmodelswithoutpharmacogeneticinformationforbayesianforecastingincriticallyillpatients AT liebchenuwe systematicevaluationofvoriconazolepharmacokineticmodelswithoutpharmacogeneticinformationforbayesianforecastingincriticallyillpatients |