Cargando…

Systematic Evaluation of Voriconazole Pharmacokinetic Models without Pharmacogenetic Information for Bayesian Forecasting in Critically Ill Patients

Voriconazole (VRC) is used as first line antifungal agent against invasive aspergillosis. Model-based approaches might optimize VRC therapy. This study aimed to investigate the predictive performance of pharmacokinetic models of VRC without pharmacogenetic information for their suitability for model...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kallee, Simon, Scharf, Christina, Schatz, Lea Marie, Paal, Michael, Vogeser, Michael, Irlbeck, Michael, Zander, Johannes, Zoller, Michael, Liebchen, Uwe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9505877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36145667
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14091920
_version_ 1784796582987694080
author Kallee, Simon
Scharf, Christina
Schatz, Lea Marie
Paal, Michael
Vogeser, Michael
Irlbeck, Michael
Zander, Johannes
Zoller, Michael
Liebchen, Uwe
author_facet Kallee, Simon
Scharf, Christina
Schatz, Lea Marie
Paal, Michael
Vogeser, Michael
Irlbeck, Michael
Zander, Johannes
Zoller, Michael
Liebchen, Uwe
author_sort Kallee, Simon
collection PubMed
description Voriconazole (VRC) is used as first line antifungal agent against invasive aspergillosis. Model-based approaches might optimize VRC therapy. This study aimed to investigate the predictive performance of pharmacokinetic models of VRC without pharmacogenetic information for their suitability for model-informed precision dosing. Seven PopPK models were selected from a systematic literature review. A total of 66 measured VRC plasma concentrations from 33 critically ill patients was employed for analysis. The second measurement per patient was used to calculate relative Bias (rBias), mean error (ME), relative root mean squared error (rRMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) (i) only based on patient characteristics and dosing history (a priori) and (ii) integrating the first measured concentration to predict the second concentration (Bayesian forecasting). The a priori rBias/ME and rRMSE/MAE varied substantially between the models, ranging from −15.4 to 124.6%/−0.70 to 8.01 mg/L and from 89.3 to 139.1%/1.45 to 8.11 mg/L, respectively. The integration of the first TDM sample improved the predictive performance of all models, with the model by Chen (85.0%) showing the best predictive performance (rRMSE: 85.0%; rBias: 4.0%). Our study revealed a certain degree of imprecision for all investigated models, so their sole use is not recommendable. Models with a higher performance would be necessary for clinical use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9505877
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95058772022-09-24 Systematic Evaluation of Voriconazole Pharmacokinetic Models without Pharmacogenetic Information for Bayesian Forecasting in Critically Ill Patients Kallee, Simon Scharf, Christina Schatz, Lea Marie Paal, Michael Vogeser, Michael Irlbeck, Michael Zander, Johannes Zoller, Michael Liebchen, Uwe Pharmaceutics Article Voriconazole (VRC) is used as first line antifungal agent against invasive aspergillosis. Model-based approaches might optimize VRC therapy. This study aimed to investigate the predictive performance of pharmacokinetic models of VRC without pharmacogenetic information for their suitability for model-informed precision dosing. Seven PopPK models were selected from a systematic literature review. A total of 66 measured VRC plasma concentrations from 33 critically ill patients was employed for analysis. The second measurement per patient was used to calculate relative Bias (rBias), mean error (ME), relative root mean squared error (rRMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) (i) only based on patient characteristics and dosing history (a priori) and (ii) integrating the first measured concentration to predict the second concentration (Bayesian forecasting). The a priori rBias/ME and rRMSE/MAE varied substantially between the models, ranging from −15.4 to 124.6%/−0.70 to 8.01 mg/L and from 89.3 to 139.1%/1.45 to 8.11 mg/L, respectively. The integration of the first TDM sample improved the predictive performance of all models, with the model by Chen (85.0%) showing the best predictive performance (rRMSE: 85.0%; rBias: 4.0%). Our study revealed a certain degree of imprecision for all investigated models, so their sole use is not recommendable. Models with a higher performance would be necessary for clinical use. MDPI 2022-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9505877/ /pubmed/36145667 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14091920 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kallee, Simon
Scharf, Christina
Schatz, Lea Marie
Paal, Michael
Vogeser, Michael
Irlbeck, Michael
Zander, Johannes
Zoller, Michael
Liebchen, Uwe
Systematic Evaluation of Voriconazole Pharmacokinetic Models without Pharmacogenetic Information for Bayesian Forecasting in Critically Ill Patients
title Systematic Evaluation of Voriconazole Pharmacokinetic Models without Pharmacogenetic Information for Bayesian Forecasting in Critically Ill Patients
title_full Systematic Evaluation of Voriconazole Pharmacokinetic Models without Pharmacogenetic Information for Bayesian Forecasting in Critically Ill Patients
title_fullStr Systematic Evaluation of Voriconazole Pharmacokinetic Models without Pharmacogenetic Information for Bayesian Forecasting in Critically Ill Patients
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Evaluation of Voriconazole Pharmacokinetic Models without Pharmacogenetic Information for Bayesian Forecasting in Critically Ill Patients
title_short Systematic Evaluation of Voriconazole Pharmacokinetic Models without Pharmacogenetic Information for Bayesian Forecasting in Critically Ill Patients
title_sort systematic evaluation of voriconazole pharmacokinetic models without pharmacogenetic information for bayesian forecasting in critically ill patients
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9505877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36145667
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14091920
work_keys_str_mv AT kalleesimon systematicevaluationofvoriconazolepharmacokineticmodelswithoutpharmacogeneticinformationforbayesianforecastingincriticallyillpatients
AT scharfchristina systematicevaluationofvoriconazolepharmacokineticmodelswithoutpharmacogeneticinformationforbayesianforecastingincriticallyillpatients
AT schatzleamarie systematicevaluationofvoriconazolepharmacokineticmodelswithoutpharmacogeneticinformationforbayesianforecastingincriticallyillpatients
AT paalmichael systematicevaluationofvoriconazolepharmacokineticmodelswithoutpharmacogeneticinformationforbayesianforecastingincriticallyillpatients
AT vogesermichael systematicevaluationofvoriconazolepharmacokineticmodelswithoutpharmacogeneticinformationforbayesianforecastingincriticallyillpatients
AT irlbeckmichael systematicevaluationofvoriconazolepharmacokineticmodelswithoutpharmacogeneticinformationforbayesianforecastingincriticallyillpatients
AT zanderjohannes systematicevaluationofvoriconazolepharmacokineticmodelswithoutpharmacogeneticinformationforbayesianforecastingincriticallyillpatients
AT zollermichael systematicevaluationofvoriconazolepharmacokineticmodelswithoutpharmacogeneticinformationforbayesianforecastingincriticallyillpatients
AT liebchenuwe systematicevaluationofvoriconazolepharmacokineticmodelswithoutpharmacogeneticinformationforbayesianforecastingincriticallyillpatients