Cargando…

Mobile Forensics: Repeatable and Non-Repeatable Technical Assessments

This paper presents several scenarios where digital evidence can be collected from mobile devices, their legal value keeping untouched. The paper describes a robust methodology for mobile forensics developed through on-field experiences directly gained by the authors over the last 10 years and many...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cuomo, Raffaele, D’Agostino, Davide, Ianulardo, Mario
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9505885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36146443
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22187096
_version_ 1784796584978939904
author Cuomo, Raffaele
D’Agostino, Davide
Ianulardo, Mario
author_facet Cuomo, Raffaele
D’Agostino, Davide
Ianulardo, Mario
author_sort Cuomo, Raffaele
collection PubMed
description This paper presents several scenarios where digital evidence can be collected from mobile devices, their legal value keeping untouched. The paper describes a robust methodology for mobile forensics developed through on-field experiences directly gained by the authors over the last 10 years and many real court cases. The results show that mobile forensics, digital analysis of smartphone Android or iOS can be obtained in two ways: on the one hand, data extraction must follow the best practice of the repeatability procedure; on the other hand, the extraction of the data must follow the best practice of the non-repeatability procedure. The laboratory study of the two methods for extracting digital data from mobile phones, for use as evidence in court trials, has shown that the same evidence can be obtained even when the procedure of unavailability of file mining activities has been adopted. Indeed, thanks to laboratory tests, the existence of multiple files frequently and continuously subjected to changes generated by the presence of several hashes found at forensic extractions conducted in very short moments of time (sometimes not exceeding 15 min) has been proven. If, on the other hand, the examination of a device is entrusted to a judicial police officer in order to conduct a forensic analysis to acquire data produced and managed by the user (such as images, audio, video, documents, SMS, MMS, chat conversations, address book content, etc.) we have sufficient grounds to believe that such examination can be organized according to the system of repeatable technical assessments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9505885
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95058852022-09-24 Mobile Forensics: Repeatable and Non-Repeatable Technical Assessments Cuomo, Raffaele D’Agostino, Davide Ianulardo, Mario Sensors (Basel) Article This paper presents several scenarios where digital evidence can be collected from mobile devices, their legal value keeping untouched. The paper describes a robust methodology for mobile forensics developed through on-field experiences directly gained by the authors over the last 10 years and many real court cases. The results show that mobile forensics, digital analysis of smartphone Android or iOS can be obtained in two ways: on the one hand, data extraction must follow the best practice of the repeatability procedure; on the other hand, the extraction of the data must follow the best practice of the non-repeatability procedure. The laboratory study of the two methods for extracting digital data from mobile phones, for use as evidence in court trials, has shown that the same evidence can be obtained even when the procedure of unavailability of file mining activities has been adopted. Indeed, thanks to laboratory tests, the existence of multiple files frequently and continuously subjected to changes generated by the presence of several hashes found at forensic extractions conducted in very short moments of time (sometimes not exceeding 15 min) has been proven. If, on the other hand, the examination of a device is entrusted to a judicial police officer in order to conduct a forensic analysis to acquire data produced and managed by the user (such as images, audio, video, documents, SMS, MMS, chat conversations, address book content, etc.) we have sufficient grounds to believe that such examination can be organized according to the system of repeatable technical assessments. MDPI 2022-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9505885/ /pubmed/36146443 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22187096 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Cuomo, Raffaele
D’Agostino, Davide
Ianulardo, Mario
Mobile Forensics: Repeatable and Non-Repeatable Technical Assessments
title Mobile Forensics: Repeatable and Non-Repeatable Technical Assessments
title_full Mobile Forensics: Repeatable and Non-Repeatable Technical Assessments
title_fullStr Mobile Forensics: Repeatable and Non-Repeatable Technical Assessments
title_full_unstemmed Mobile Forensics: Repeatable and Non-Repeatable Technical Assessments
title_short Mobile Forensics: Repeatable and Non-Repeatable Technical Assessments
title_sort mobile forensics: repeatable and non-repeatable technical assessments
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9505885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36146443
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22187096
work_keys_str_mv AT cuomoraffaele mobileforensicsrepeatableandnonrepeatabletechnicalassessments
AT dagostinodavide mobileforensicsrepeatableandnonrepeatabletechnicalassessments
AT ianulardomario mobileforensicsrepeatableandnonrepeatabletechnicalassessments