Cargando…

Development and Validation of the Minnesota Assessment of Pharmacogenomic Literacy (MAPL)

Ensuring that patients have an adequate understanding of pharmacogenomic (PGx) test results is a critical component of implementing precision medicine into clinical care. However, no PGx-specific validated literacy assessment has yet been developed. To address this need, we developed and validated t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Allen, Josiah D., Zhang, Lusi, Johnson, Alyssa N. K., Jacobson, Pamala A., McCarty, Catherine A., Pittenger, Amy L., Bishop, Jeffrey R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9506235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36143184
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12091398
_version_ 1784796672649330688
author Allen, Josiah D.
Zhang, Lusi
Johnson, Alyssa N. K.
Jacobson, Pamala A.
McCarty, Catherine A.
Pittenger, Amy L.
Bishop, Jeffrey R.
author_facet Allen, Josiah D.
Zhang, Lusi
Johnson, Alyssa N. K.
Jacobson, Pamala A.
McCarty, Catherine A.
Pittenger, Amy L.
Bishop, Jeffrey R.
author_sort Allen, Josiah D.
collection PubMed
description Ensuring that patients have an adequate understanding of pharmacogenomic (PGx) test results is a critical component of implementing precision medicine into clinical care. However, no PGx-specific validated literacy assessment has yet been developed. To address this need, we developed and validated the Minnesota Assessment of Pharmacogenomic Literacy (MAPL(TM)). Foundational work included a scoping review of patient and general public attitudes and experiences with pharmacogenomic testing, three focus groups, readability assessments, and review by experts and members of the general public. This resulted in a 15-item assessment designed to assess knowledge in four domains: underlying concepts, limitations, benefits, and privacy. For validation, 646 participants completed the MAPL as a part of a larger survey about pharmacogenomic research and statewide PGx implementation. Two items were deemed to be “too easy” and dropped. The remaining 13 items were retained in the final MAPL with good internal reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.75). Confirmatory factor analysis validated the four-domain construct of MAPL and suggested good model performance and high internal validity. The estimated coefficient loadings across 13 questions on the corresponding domains are all positive and statistically significant (p < 0.05). The MAPL covers multiple knowledge domains of specific relevance to PGx and is a useful tool for clinical and research settings where quantitative assessment of PGx literacy is of value.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9506235
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95062352022-09-24 Development and Validation of the Minnesota Assessment of Pharmacogenomic Literacy (MAPL) Allen, Josiah D. Zhang, Lusi Johnson, Alyssa N. K. Jacobson, Pamala A. McCarty, Catherine A. Pittenger, Amy L. Bishop, Jeffrey R. J Pers Med Article Ensuring that patients have an adequate understanding of pharmacogenomic (PGx) test results is a critical component of implementing precision medicine into clinical care. However, no PGx-specific validated literacy assessment has yet been developed. To address this need, we developed and validated the Minnesota Assessment of Pharmacogenomic Literacy (MAPL(TM)). Foundational work included a scoping review of patient and general public attitudes and experiences with pharmacogenomic testing, three focus groups, readability assessments, and review by experts and members of the general public. This resulted in a 15-item assessment designed to assess knowledge in four domains: underlying concepts, limitations, benefits, and privacy. For validation, 646 participants completed the MAPL as a part of a larger survey about pharmacogenomic research and statewide PGx implementation. Two items were deemed to be “too easy” and dropped. The remaining 13 items were retained in the final MAPL with good internal reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.75). Confirmatory factor analysis validated the four-domain construct of MAPL and suggested good model performance and high internal validity. The estimated coefficient loadings across 13 questions on the corresponding domains are all positive and statistically significant (p < 0.05). The MAPL covers multiple knowledge domains of specific relevance to PGx and is a useful tool for clinical and research settings where quantitative assessment of PGx literacy is of value. MDPI 2022-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9506235/ /pubmed/36143184 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12091398 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Allen, Josiah D.
Zhang, Lusi
Johnson, Alyssa N. K.
Jacobson, Pamala A.
McCarty, Catherine A.
Pittenger, Amy L.
Bishop, Jeffrey R.
Development and Validation of the Minnesota Assessment of Pharmacogenomic Literacy (MAPL)
title Development and Validation of the Minnesota Assessment of Pharmacogenomic Literacy (MAPL)
title_full Development and Validation of the Minnesota Assessment of Pharmacogenomic Literacy (MAPL)
title_fullStr Development and Validation of the Minnesota Assessment of Pharmacogenomic Literacy (MAPL)
title_full_unstemmed Development and Validation of the Minnesota Assessment of Pharmacogenomic Literacy (MAPL)
title_short Development and Validation of the Minnesota Assessment of Pharmacogenomic Literacy (MAPL)
title_sort development and validation of the minnesota assessment of pharmacogenomic literacy (mapl)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9506235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36143184
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12091398
work_keys_str_mv AT allenjosiahd developmentandvalidationoftheminnesotaassessmentofpharmacogenomicliteracymapl
AT zhanglusi developmentandvalidationoftheminnesotaassessmentofpharmacogenomicliteracymapl
AT johnsonalyssank developmentandvalidationoftheminnesotaassessmentofpharmacogenomicliteracymapl
AT jacobsonpamalaa developmentandvalidationoftheminnesotaassessmentofpharmacogenomicliteracymapl
AT mccartycatherinea developmentandvalidationoftheminnesotaassessmentofpharmacogenomicliteracymapl
AT pittengeramyl developmentandvalidationoftheminnesotaassessmentofpharmacogenomicliteracymapl
AT bishopjeffreyr developmentandvalidationoftheminnesotaassessmentofpharmacogenomicliteracymapl