Cargando…
Development and Validation of the Minnesota Assessment of Pharmacogenomic Literacy (MAPL)
Ensuring that patients have an adequate understanding of pharmacogenomic (PGx) test results is a critical component of implementing precision medicine into clinical care. However, no PGx-specific validated literacy assessment has yet been developed. To address this need, we developed and validated t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9506235/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36143184 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12091398 |
_version_ | 1784796672649330688 |
---|---|
author | Allen, Josiah D. Zhang, Lusi Johnson, Alyssa N. K. Jacobson, Pamala A. McCarty, Catherine A. Pittenger, Amy L. Bishop, Jeffrey R. |
author_facet | Allen, Josiah D. Zhang, Lusi Johnson, Alyssa N. K. Jacobson, Pamala A. McCarty, Catherine A. Pittenger, Amy L. Bishop, Jeffrey R. |
author_sort | Allen, Josiah D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ensuring that patients have an adequate understanding of pharmacogenomic (PGx) test results is a critical component of implementing precision medicine into clinical care. However, no PGx-specific validated literacy assessment has yet been developed. To address this need, we developed and validated the Minnesota Assessment of Pharmacogenomic Literacy (MAPL(TM)). Foundational work included a scoping review of patient and general public attitudes and experiences with pharmacogenomic testing, three focus groups, readability assessments, and review by experts and members of the general public. This resulted in a 15-item assessment designed to assess knowledge in four domains: underlying concepts, limitations, benefits, and privacy. For validation, 646 participants completed the MAPL as a part of a larger survey about pharmacogenomic research and statewide PGx implementation. Two items were deemed to be “too easy” and dropped. The remaining 13 items were retained in the final MAPL with good internal reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.75). Confirmatory factor analysis validated the four-domain construct of MAPL and suggested good model performance and high internal validity. The estimated coefficient loadings across 13 questions on the corresponding domains are all positive and statistically significant (p < 0.05). The MAPL covers multiple knowledge domains of specific relevance to PGx and is a useful tool for clinical and research settings where quantitative assessment of PGx literacy is of value. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9506235 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95062352022-09-24 Development and Validation of the Minnesota Assessment of Pharmacogenomic Literacy (MAPL) Allen, Josiah D. Zhang, Lusi Johnson, Alyssa N. K. Jacobson, Pamala A. McCarty, Catherine A. Pittenger, Amy L. Bishop, Jeffrey R. J Pers Med Article Ensuring that patients have an adequate understanding of pharmacogenomic (PGx) test results is a critical component of implementing precision medicine into clinical care. However, no PGx-specific validated literacy assessment has yet been developed. To address this need, we developed and validated the Minnesota Assessment of Pharmacogenomic Literacy (MAPL(TM)). Foundational work included a scoping review of patient and general public attitudes and experiences with pharmacogenomic testing, three focus groups, readability assessments, and review by experts and members of the general public. This resulted in a 15-item assessment designed to assess knowledge in four domains: underlying concepts, limitations, benefits, and privacy. For validation, 646 participants completed the MAPL as a part of a larger survey about pharmacogenomic research and statewide PGx implementation. Two items were deemed to be “too easy” and dropped. The remaining 13 items were retained in the final MAPL with good internal reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.75). Confirmatory factor analysis validated the four-domain construct of MAPL and suggested good model performance and high internal validity. The estimated coefficient loadings across 13 questions on the corresponding domains are all positive and statistically significant (p < 0.05). The MAPL covers multiple knowledge domains of specific relevance to PGx and is a useful tool for clinical and research settings where quantitative assessment of PGx literacy is of value. MDPI 2022-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9506235/ /pubmed/36143184 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12091398 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Allen, Josiah D. Zhang, Lusi Johnson, Alyssa N. K. Jacobson, Pamala A. McCarty, Catherine A. Pittenger, Amy L. Bishop, Jeffrey R. Development and Validation of the Minnesota Assessment of Pharmacogenomic Literacy (MAPL) |
title | Development and Validation of the Minnesota Assessment of Pharmacogenomic Literacy (MAPL) |
title_full | Development and Validation of the Minnesota Assessment of Pharmacogenomic Literacy (MAPL) |
title_fullStr | Development and Validation of the Minnesota Assessment of Pharmacogenomic Literacy (MAPL) |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and Validation of the Minnesota Assessment of Pharmacogenomic Literacy (MAPL) |
title_short | Development and Validation of the Minnesota Assessment of Pharmacogenomic Literacy (MAPL) |
title_sort | development and validation of the minnesota assessment of pharmacogenomic literacy (mapl) |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9506235/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36143184 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12091398 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT allenjosiahd developmentandvalidationoftheminnesotaassessmentofpharmacogenomicliteracymapl AT zhanglusi developmentandvalidationoftheminnesotaassessmentofpharmacogenomicliteracymapl AT johnsonalyssank developmentandvalidationoftheminnesotaassessmentofpharmacogenomicliteracymapl AT jacobsonpamalaa developmentandvalidationoftheminnesotaassessmentofpharmacogenomicliteracymapl AT mccartycatherinea developmentandvalidationoftheminnesotaassessmentofpharmacogenomicliteracymapl AT pittengeramyl developmentandvalidationoftheminnesotaassessmentofpharmacogenomicliteracymapl AT bishopjeffreyr developmentandvalidationoftheminnesotaassessmentofpharmacogenomicliteracymapl |