Cargando…

Analysis of initial stress distribution in palatal bone around the implant in lingual orthodontics for single and double palatal implant systems: a FEM study

OBJECTIVE: To analyze and compare the Von Mises stress and principal stress distribution in palatal bone around the palatal implant in lingual orthodontics (LiO) for single and double palatal implant systems with varying lengths of lever arm. METHODS: Two groups were assessed: single (Group 1) and d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: KUSHWAH, Ashish, KUMAR, Mukesh, PREMSAGAR, Shruti, SHARMA, Sonika, KUMAR, Sumit, SAILESH, Tamada
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dental Press International 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9507026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36169494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.27.4.e2120492.oar
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To analyze and compare the Von Mises stress and principal stress distribution in palatal bone around the palatal implant in lingual orthodontics (LiO) for single and double palatal implant systems with varying lengths of lever arm. METHODS: Two groups were assessed: single (Group 1) and double (Group 2) palatal implant systems, which were further divided into two subgroups, based on lever arm length, for analyzing stress in the palatal bone around the implant. Hence, two 3D finite element models of bilateral maxillary first premolar extraction cases were constructed in each system. Lingual brackets (0.018-in slot) were positioned at the center of the clinical crown. In both systems, 150g of retraction force was applied, and ANSYS v. 12.1 software was used to analyze and compare stress in the palatal bone around the palatal implant. RESULTS: In this study, higher stress was observed at the inner threaded interface of cortical bone. Magnitude of Von Mises stress was higher in Group 2 (0.63 MPa and 0.65 MPa) in comparison to Group 1 (0.29 MPa and 0.29 MPa). Similarly, magnitude of principal stress was higher in Group 2, in comparison to Group 1. Higher stress was observed in the apical region of the implant-bone interface of cancellous bone. CONCLUSION: This study concluded that the Von Misses stress as well as principal stress in the palatal bone were within the optimal limit in both groups. Finally, it can be concluded that both systems (single and double palatal implant) were safe for the patients in clinical use of 150g of retraction force.