Cargando…

A Comparative Study of Traditional Scleral Buckling to a New Technique: Guarded Light Pipe with Heads-Up Three-Dimensional Visualization

PURPOSE: The guarded light pipe is a recently described alternative endoillumination technique to chandelier illumination. We sought to compare the outcomes of scleral buckling (SB) under indirect ophthalmoscopy (ID) to heads-up three-dimensional visualization with a guarded light pipe (3DGLP). METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baldwin, Grace, Sokol, Jared T, Ludwig, Cassie A, Miller, John B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9507285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36160731
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S378179
_version_ 1784796849915297792
author Baldwin, Grace
Sokol, Jared T
Ludwig, Cassie A
Miller, John B
author_facet Baldwin, Grace
Sokol, Jared T
Ludwig, Cassie A
Miller, John B
author_sort Baldwin, Grace
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The guarded light pipe is a recently described alternative endoillumination technique to chandelier illumination. We sought to compare the outcomes of scleral buckling (SB) under indirect ophthalmoscopy (ID) to heads-up three-dimensional visualization with a guarded light pipe (3DGLP). METHODS: A retrospective comparative study was performed, including 47 eyes that underwent SB for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair with either traditional ID (n = 31) or 3DGLP (n = 16). RESULTS: The single surgery anatomic success rate was 87.0% in the ID group and 87.5% in the 3DGLP group. The final anatomic success rate was 100% in both groups. The median (interquartile range) post-operative logMAR was 0.10 (0.0–0.20) in the ID group and 0.08 (0.02–0.69) in the 3DGLP group (p = 0.51). The median operative time was 107 (94–123) minutes in the ID group and 100 (90–111) minutes in the 3DGLP group (p = 0.25). Among eyes that underwent subretinal fluid drainage, the operative time was significantly longer in the ID group compared to the 3DGLP group, 113 (100–135) minutes vs 93 (85–111) minutes (p = 0.035). There were no post-operative complications in the ID group and one complication of self-resolving vitreous hemorrhage associated with a malfunctioning cryoprobe in the 3DGLP group (p = 0.34). There were no cases of post-operative cataract progression in either group. CONCLUSION: Compared to traditional SB, 3DGLP improves ergonomics and educational value with similar anatomical, visual, intra and post-operative outcomes and may result in shorter operative time in cases requiring subretinal fluid drainage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9507285
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95072852022-09-24 A Comparative Study of Traditional Scleral Buckling to a New Technique: Guarded Light Pipe with Heads-Up Three-Dimensional Visualization Baldwin, Grace Sokol, Jared T Ludwig, Cassie A Miller, John B Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: The guarded light pipe is a recently described alternative endoillumination technique to chandelier illumination. We sought to compare the outcomes of scleral buckling (SB) under indirect ophthalmoscopy (ID) to heads-up three-dimensional visualization with a guarded light pipe (3DGLP). METHODS: A retrospective comparative study was performed, including 47 eyes that underwent SB for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair with either traditional ID (n = 31) or 3DGLP (n = 16). RESULTS: The single surgery anatomic success rate was 87.0% in the ID group and 87.5% in the 3DGLP group. The final anatomic success rate was 100% in both groups. The median (interquartile range) post-operative logMAR was 0.10 (0.0–0.20) in the ID group and 0.08 (0.02–0.69) in the 3DGLP group (p = 0.51). The median operative time was 107 (94–123) minutes in the ID group and 100 (90–111) minutes in the 3DGLP group (p = 0.25). Among eyes that underwent subretinal fluid drainage, the operative time was significantly longer in the ID group compared to the 3DGLP group, 113 (100–135) minutes vs 93 (85–111) minutes (p = 0.035). There were no post-operative complications in the ID group and one complication of self-resolving vitreous hemorrhage associated with a malfunctioning cryoprobe in the 3DGLP group (p = 0.34). There were no cases of post-operative cataract progression in either group. CONCLUSION: Compared to traditional SB, 3DGLP improves ergonomics and educational value with similar anatomical, visual, intra and post-operative outcomes and may result in shorter operative time in cases requiring subretinal fluid drainage. Dove 2022-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9507285/ /pubmed/36160731 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S378179 Text en © 2022 Baldwin et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Baldwin, Grace
Sokol, Jared T
Ludwig, Cassie A
Miller, John B
A Comparative Study of Traditional Scleral Buckling to a New Technique: Guarded Light Pipe with Heads-Up Three-Dimensional Visualization
title A Comparative Study of Traditional Scleral Buckling to a New Technique: Guarded Light Pipe with Heads-Up Three-Dimensional Visualization
title_full A Comparative Study of Traditional Scleral Buckling to a New Technique: Guarded Light Pipe with Heads-Up Three-Dimensional Visualization
title_fullStr A Comparative Study of Traditional Scleral Buckling to a New Technique: Guarded Light Pipe with Heads-Up Three-Dimensional Visualization
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study of Traditional Scleral Buckling to a New Technique: Guarded Light Pipe with Heads-Up Three-Dimensional Visualization
title_short A Comparative Study of Traditional Scleral Buckling to a New Technique: Guarded Light Pipe with Heads-Up Three-Dimensional Visualization
title_sort comparative study of traditional scleral buckling to a new technique: guarded light pipe with heads-up three-dimensional visualization
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9507285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36160731
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S378179
work_keys_str_mv AT baldwingrace acomparativestudyoftraditionalscleralbucklingtoanewtechniqueguardedlightpipewithheadsupthreedimensionalvisualization
AT sokoljaredt acomparativestudyoftraditionalscleralbucklingtoanewtechniqueguardedlightpipewithheadsupthreedimensionalvisualization
AT ludwigcassiea acomparativestudyoftraditionalscleralbucklingtoanewtechniqueguardedlightpipewithheadsupthreedimensionalvisualization
AT millerjohnb acomparativestudyoftraditionalscleralbucklingtoanewtechniqueguardedlightpipewithheadsupthreedimensionalvisualization
AT baldwingrace comparativestudyoftraditionalscleralbucklingtoanewtechniqueguardedlightpipewithheadsupthreedimensionalvisualization
AT sokoljaredt comparativestudyoftraditionalscleralbucklingtoanewtechniqueguardedlightpipewithheadsupthreedimensionalvisualization
AT ludwigcassiea comparativestudyoftraditionalscleralbucklingtoanewtechniqueguardedlightpipewithheadsupthreedimensionalvisualization
AT millerjohnb comparativestudyoftraditionalscleralbucklingtoanewtechniqueguardedlightpipewithheadsupthreedimensionalvisualization