Cargando…

Risk Identification and Analysis in the Development of Medical Devices Among Start-Ups: Towards a Broader Risk Management Framework

INTRODUCTION: Whilst risk management has become fundamental in the development of medical devices, enforced by regulations and international standards, there is still no comprehensive model that explains how risk management in medical devices’ development should be tackled, especially with regard to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kheir, Omar, Jacoby, Alexis, Verwulgen, Stijn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9507292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36158728
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S375977
_version_ 1784796850958630912
author Kheir, Omar
Jacoby, Alexis
Verwulgen, Stijn
author_facet Kheir, Omar
Jacoby, Alexis
Verwulgen, Stijn
author_sort Kheir, Omar
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Whilst risk management has become fundamental in the development of medical devices, enforced by regulations and international standards, there is still no comprehensive model that explains how risk management in medical devices’ development should be tackled, especially with regard to the type of risks that should be addressed. Risk management in the medical devices’ development field is currently focused on technical risks, comprising product, usability, and development process risks, in alignment with standards’ requirements and regulations, without giving enough attention to non-technical risks, which include business and project risks. Start-ups within this heavily regulated domain have a key role in the innovation process, yet they suffer a structural lack of tangible, such as financial capacity, and intangible resources such as development, risk management, and regulations’ compliance. Nonetheless, they can still optimize their risk identification coverage beyond the enforced requirements to increase their products’ chances of success. METHODS: A set of qualitative interviews, serving the adopted grounded theory building research method, with seven start-ups who are involved in the development, commercialization, and quality control of medical devices was accomplished. The purpose was to determine the applied risk management practices and most importantly identify the risk types covered by them. Since every start-up is a project by itself, a sample of project risks, as identified by the project management institute, was utilized to scope the risk coverage and flag missing non-technical risks by the participating start-ups. RESULTS: Un-identified risk types, lack of involvement of the right teams, and other related loopholes were presented. DISCUSSION: A list of requirements was developed and sketched in a user-friendly risk management framework, which is believed to be crucial in helping start-ups attain successful, safe, and regulatory compliant medical devices production, is shared in the discussion and proposed framework section of this paper.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9507292
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95072922022-09-24 Risk Identification and Analysis in the Development of Medical Devices Among Start-Ups: Towards a Broader Risk Management Framework Kheir, Omar Jacoby, Alexis Verwulgen, Stijn Med Devices (Auckl) Original Research INTRODUCTION: Whilst risk management has become fundamental in the development of medical devices, enforced by regulations and international standards, there is still no comprehensive model that explains how risk management in medical devices’ development should be tackled, especially with regard to the type of risks that should be addressed. Risk management in the medical devices’ development field is currently focused on technical risks, comprising product, usability, and development process risks, in alignment with standards’ requirements and regulations, without giving enough attention to non-technical risks, which include business and project risks. Start-ups within this heavily regulated domain have a key role in the innovation process, yet they suffer a structural lack of tangible, such as financial capacity, and intangible resources such as development, risk management, and regulations’ compliance. Nonetheless, they can still optimize their risk identification coverage beyond the enforced requirements to increase their products’ chances of success. METHODS: A set of qualitative interviews, serving the adopted grounded theory building research method, with seven start-ups who are involved in the development, commercialization, and quality control of medical devices was accomplished. The purpose was to determine the applied risk management practices and most importantly identify the risk types covered by them. Since every start-up is a project by itself, a sample of project risks, as identified by the project management institute, was utilized to scope the risk coverage and flag missing non-technical risks by the participating start-ups. RESULTS: Un-identified risk types, lack of involvement of the right teams, and other related loopholes were presented. DISCUSSION: A list of requirements was developed and sketched in a user-friendly risk management framework, which is believed to be crucial in helping start-ups attain successful, safe, and regulatory compliant medical devices production, is shared in the discussion and proposed framework section of this paper. Dove 2022-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9507292/ /pubmed/36158728 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S375977 Text en © 2022 Kheir et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Kheir, Omar
Jacoby, Alexis
Verwulgen, Stijn
Risk Identification and Analysis in the Development of Medical Devices Among Start-Ups: Towards a Broader Risk Management Framework
title Risk Identification and Analysis in the Development of Medical Devices Among Start-Ups: Towards a Broader Risk Management Framework
title_full Risk Identification and Analysis in the Development of Medical Devices Among Start-Ups: Towards a Broader Risk Management Framework
title_fullStr Risk Identification and Analysis in the Development of Medical Devices Among Start-Ups: Towards a Broader Risk Management Framework
title_full_unstemmed Risk Identification and Analysis in the Development of Medical Devices Among Start-Ups: Towards a Broader Risk Management Framework
title_short Risk Identification and Analysis in the Development of Medical Devices Among Start-Ups: Towards a Broader Risk Management Framework
title_sort risk identification and analysis in the development of medical devices among start-ups: towards a broader risk management framework
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9507292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36158728
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S375977
work_keys_str_mv AT kheiromar riskidentificationandanalysisinthedevelopmentofmedicaldevicesamongstartupstowardsabroaderriskmanagementframework
AT jacobyalexis riskidentificationandanalysisinthedevelopmentofmedicaldevicesamongstartupstowardsabroaderriskmanagementframework
AT verwulgenstijn riskidentificationandanalysisinthedevelopmentofmedicaldevicesamongstartupstowardsabroaderriskmanagementframework