Cargando…

LASSO Model Better Predicted the Prognosis of DLBCL than Random Forest Model: A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis of HHLWG

BACKGROUND: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a heterogeneous non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with great clinical challenge. Machine learning (ML) has attracted substantial attention in diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of diseases. This study is aimed at exploring the prognostic factors of DLB...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shen, Ziyuan, Zhang, Shuo, Jiao, Yaxue, Shi, Yuye, Zhang, Hao, Wang, Fei, Wang, Ling, Zhu, Taigang, Miao, Yuqing, Sang, Wei, Cai, Guoqi, Huaihai Lymphoma, Working Group
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9507678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36157230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1618272
_version_ 1784796890448003072
author Shen, Ziyuan
Zhang, Shuo
Jiao, Yaxue
Shi, Yuye
Zhang, Hao
Wang, Fei
Wang, Ling
Zhu, Taigang
Miao, Yuqing
Sang, Wei
Cai, Guoqi
Huaihai Lymphoma, Working Group
author_facet Shen, Ziyuan
Zhang, Shuo
Jiao, Yaxue
Shi, Yuye
Zhang, Hao
Wang, Fei
Wang, Ling
Zhu, Taigang
Miao, Yuqing
Sang, Wei
Cai, Guoqi
Huaihai Lymphoma, Working Group
author_sort Shen, Ziyuan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a heterogeneous non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with great clinical challenge. Machine learning (ML) has attracted substantial attention in diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of diseases. This study is aimed at exploring the prognostic factors of DLBCL by ML. METHODS: In total, 1211 DLBCL patients were retrieved from Huaihai Lymphoma Working Group (HHLWG). The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and random forest algorithm were used to identify prognostic factors for the overall survival (OS) rate of DLBCL among twenty-five variables. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) were utilized to compare the predictive performance and clinical effectiveness of the two models, respectively. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 43.4 months, and the 5-year OS was 58.5%. The LASSO model achieved an Area under the curve (AUC) of 75.8% for the prognosis of DLBCL, which was higher than that of the random forest model (AUC: 71.6%). DCA analysis also revealed that the LASSO model could augment net benefits and exhibited a wider range of threshold probabilities by risk stratification than the random forest model. In addition, multivariable analysis demonstrated that age, white blood cell count, hemoglobin, central nervous system involvement, gender, and Ann Arbor stage were independent prognostic factors for DLBCL. The LASSO model showed better discrimination of outcomes compared with the IPI and NCCN-IPI models and identified three groups of patients: low risk, high-intermediate risk, and high risk. CONCLUSIONS: The prognostic model of DLBCL based on the LASSO regression was more accurate than the random forest, IPI, and NCCN-IPI models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9507678
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95076782022-09-24 LASSO Model Better Predicted the Prognosis of DLBCL than Random Forest Model: A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis of HHLWG Shen, Ziyuan Zhang, Shuo Jiao, Yaxue Shi, Yuye Zhang, Hao Wang, Fei Wang, Ling Zhu, Taigang Miao, Yuqing Sang, Wei Cai, Guoqi Huaihai Lymphoma, Working Group J Oncol Research Article BACKGROUND: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a heterogeneous non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with great clinical challenge. Machine learning (ML) has attracted substantial attention in diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of diseases. This study is aimed at exploring the prognostic factors of DLBCL by ML. METHODS: In total, 1211 DLBCL patients were retrieved from Huaihai Lymphoma Working Group (HHLWG). The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and random forest algorithm were used to identify prognostic factors for the overall survival (OS) rate of DLBCL among twenty-five variables. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) were utilized to compare the predictive performance and clinical effectiveness of the two models, respectively. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 43.4 months, and the 5-year OS was 58.5%. The LASSO model achieved an Area under the curve (AUC) of 75.8% for the prognosis of DLBCL, which was higher than that of the random forest model (AUC: 71.6%). DCA analysis also revealed that the LASSO model could augment net benefits and exhibited a wider range of threshold probabilities by risk stratification than the random forest model. In addition, multivariable analysis demonstrated that age, white blood cell count, hemoglobin, central nervous system involvement, gender, and Ann Arbor stage were independent prognostic factors for DLBCL. The LASSO model showed better discrimination of outcomes compared with the IPI and NCCN-IPI models and identified three groups of patients: low risk, high-intermediate risk, and high risk. CONCLUSIONS: The prognostic model of DLBCL based on the LASSO regression was more accurate than the random forest, IPI, and NCCN-IPI models. Hindawi 2022-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9507678/ /pubmed/36157230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1618272 Text en Copyright © 2022 Ziyuan Shen et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shen, Ziyuan
Zhang, Shuo
Jiao, Yaxue
Shi, Yuye
Zhang, Hao
Wang, Fei
Wang, Ling
Zhu, Taigang
Miao, Yuqing
Sang, Wei
Cai, Guoqi
Huaihai Lymphoma, Working Group
LASSO Model Better Predicted the Prognosis of DLBCL than Random Forest Model: A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis of HHLWG
title LASSO Model Better Predicted the Prognosis of DLBCL than Random Forest Model: A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis of HHLWG
title_full LASSO Model Better Predicted the Prognosis of DLBCL than Random Forest Model: A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis of HHLWG
title_fullStr LASSO Model Better Predicted the Prognosis of DLBCL than Random Forest Model: A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis of HHLWG
title_full_unstemmed LASSO Model Better Predicted the Prognosis of DLBCL than Random Forest Model: A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis of HHLWG
title_short LASSO Model Better Predicted the Prognosis of DLBCL than Random Forest Model: A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis of HHLWG
title_sort lasso model better predicted the prognosis of dlbcl than random forest model: a retrospective multicenter analysis of hhlwg
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9507678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36157230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1618272
work_keys_str_mv AT shenziyuan lassomodelbetterpredictedtheprognosisofdlbclthanrandomforestmodelaretrospectivemulticenteranalysisofhhlwg
AT zhangshuo lassomodelbetterpredictedtheprognosisofdlbclthanrandomforestmodelaretrospectivemulticenteranalysisofhhlwg
AT jiaoyaxue lassomodelbetterpredictedtheprognosisofdlbclthanrandomforestmodelaretrospectivemulticenteranalysisofhhlwg
AT shiyuye lassomodelbetterpredictedtheprognosisofdlbclthanrandomforestmodelaretrospectivemulticenteranalysisofhhlwg
AT zhanghao lassomodelbetterpredictedtheprognosisofdlbclthanrandomforestmodelaretrospectivemulticenteranalysisofhhlwg
AT wangfei lassomodelbetterpredictedtheprognosisofdlbclthanrandomforestmodelaretrospectivemulticenteranalysisofhhlwg
AT wangling lassomodelbetterpredictedtheprognosisofdlbclthanrandomforestmodelaretrospectivemulticenteranalysisofhhlwg
AT zhutaigang lassomodelbetterpredictedtheprognosisofdlbclthanrandomforestmodelaretrospectivemulticenteranalysisofhhlwg
AT miaoyuqing lassomodelbetterpredictedtheprognosisofdlbclthanrandomforestmodelaretrospectivemulticenteranalysisofhhlwg
AT sangwei lassomodelbetterpredictedtheprognosisofdlbclthanrandomforestmodelaretrospectivemulticenteranalysisofhhlwg
AT caiguoqi lassomodelbetterpredictedtheprognosisofdlbclthanrandomforestmodelaretrospectivemulticenteranalysisofhhlwg
AT huaihailymphomaworkinggroup lassomodelbetterpredictedtheprognosisofdlbclthanrandomforestmodelaretrospectivemulticenteranalysisofhhlwg