Cargando…
Dissociating stimulus-response compatibility and modality compatibility in task switching
Modality compatibility (MC) describes the similarity between the modality of the stimulus and the modality of the anticipated response effect (e.g., auditory effects when speaking). Switching between two incompatible modality mappings (visual-vocal and auditory-manual) typically leads to larger cost...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9508013/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35103924 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-022-01276-4 |
_version_ | 1784796927599050752 |
---|---|
author | Friedgen, Erik Koch, Iring Stephan, Denise Nadine |
author_facet | Friedgen, Erik Koch, Iring Stephan, Denise Nadine |
author_sort | Friedgen, Erik |
collection | PubMed |
description | Modality compatibility (MC) describes the similarity between the modality of the stimulus and the modality of the anticipated response effect (e.g., auditory effects when speaking). Switching between two incompatible modality mappings (visual-vocal and auditory-manual) typically leads to larger costs than switching between two compatible modality mappings (visual-manual and auditory-vocal). However, it is unclear whether the influence of MC arises before or after task selection or response selection, or affects both processes. We investigated this issue by introducing a factor known to influence response selection, stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility, examining possible interactions with MC. In Experiment 1, stimulus location was task-irrelevant; participants responded manually or vocally to the meaning of visual and auditory colour words presented left or right (Simon task). In Experiment 2, stimulus location was task-relevant; participants responded manually or vocally, indicating the location (left or right) of visual or auditory stimuli, using a spatially compatible versus incompatible mapping rule (“element-level” S-R compatibility). Results revealed independent effects of S-R and modality compatibility in both experiments (n = 40 per experiment). Bayes factors suggested moderate but consistent evidence for the absence of an interaction. Independent effects suggest MC effects arise either before or after response selection, or possibly both. We propose that motor response initiation is associated with anticipatory activation of modality-specific sensory effects (e.g., auditory effects when speaking), which in turn facilitates the correct response in case of modality-compatible mappings (e.g., auditory-vocal) or reactivates, at the task-selection level, the incorrect task in case of modality-incompatible mappings (e.g., visual-vocal). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9508013 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95080132022-09-25 Dissociating stimulus-response compatibility and modality compatibility in task switching Friedgen, Erik Koch, Iring Stephan, Denise Nadine Mem Cognit Article Modality compatibility (MC) describes the similarity between the modality of the stimulus and the modality of the anticipated response effect (e.g., auditory effects when speaking). Switching between two incompatible modality mappings (visual-vocal and auditory-manual) typically leads to larger costs than switching between two compatible modality mappings (visual-manual and auditory-vocal). However, it is unclear whether the influence of MC arises before or after task selection or response selection, or affects both processes. We investigated this issue by introducing a factor known to influence response selection, stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility, examining possible interactions with MC. In Experiment 1, stimulus location was task-irrelevant; participants responded manually or vocally to the meaning of visual and auditory colour words presented left or right (Simon task). In Experiment 2, stimulus location was task-relevant; participants responded manually or vocally, indicating the location (left or right) of visual or auditory stimuli, using a spatially compatible versus incompatible mapping rule (“element-level” S-R compatibility). Results revealed independent effects of S-R and modality compatibility in both experiments (n = 40 per experiment). Bayes factors suggested moderate but consistent evidence for the absence of an interaction. Independent effects suggest MC effects arise either before or after response selection, or possibly both. We propose that motor response initiation is associated with anticipatory activation of modality-specific sensory effects (e.g., auditory effects when speaking), which in turn facilitates the correct response in case of modality-compatible mappings (e.g., auditory-vocal) or reactivates, at the task-selection level, the incorrect task in case of modality-incompatible mappings (e.g., visual-vocal). Springer US 2022-02-01 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9508013/ /pubmed/35103924 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-022-01276-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Friedgen, Erik Koch, Iring Stephan, Denise Nadine Dissociating stimulus-response compatibility and modality compatibility in task switching |
title | Dissociating stimulus-response compatibility and modality compatibility in task switching |
title_full | Dissociating stimulus-response compatibility and modality compatibility in task switching |
title_fullStr | Dissociating stimulus-response compatibility and modality compatibility in task switching |
title_full_unstemmed | Dissociating stimulus-response compatibility and modality compatibility in task switching |
title_short | Dissociating stimulus-response compatibility and modality compatibility in task switching |
title_sort | dissociating stimulus-response compatibility and modality compatibility in task switching |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9508013/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35103924 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-022-01276-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT friedgenerik dissociatingstimulusresponsecompatibilityandmodalitycompatibilityintaskswitching AT kochiring dissociatingstimulusresponsecompatibilityandmodalitycompatibilityintaskswitching AT stephandenisenadine dissociatingstimulusresponsecompatibilityandmodalitycompatibilityintaskswitching |