Cargando…
The co-administration of live fowlpox and Newcastle disease vaccines by non-invasive routes to chickens reared by smallholders in Tanzania and Nepal
The co-administration of commercial live fowlpox (FP) and Newcastle disease (ND) vaccines when given by non-invasive (needle-free) routes was demonstrated to be safe and to elicit immunity in two field studies, one in Tanzania the other in Nepal. Both studies were of a cluster-randomised controlled...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9508032/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36149524 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11250-022-03250-3 |
_version_ | 1784796931456761856 |
---|---|
author | Andrews, Stuart J. Makundi, Asanteli Mwanadota, Julius Shivakoti, Sakar Shah, Bikas Raj Poole, E. Jane Salt, Jeremy Stuke, Kristin |
author_facet | Andrews, Stuart J. Makundi, Asanteli Mwanadota, Julius Shivakoti, Sakar Shah, Bikas Raj Poole, E. Jane Salt, Jeremy Stuke, Kristin |
author_sort | Andrews, Stuart J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The co-administration of commercial live fowlpox (FP) and Newcastle disease (ND) vaccines when given by non-invasive (needle-free) routes was demonstrated to be safe and to elicit immunity in two field studies, one in Tanzania the other in Nepal. Both studies were of a cluster-randomised controlled design in which birds were randomly assigned to one of five treatment groups: (i) administration with FP vaccine alone (feather follicle), (ii) administration with ND vaccine alone (eye-drop), (iii) concurrent administration of FP (feather follicle) and ND (eye-drop) vaccines, (iv) concurrent administration of FP (wing-web) and ND (eye-drop) vaccines, and (v) unvaccinated, acting as environmental sentinels. Data from a total of 1167 birds from seven villages in Hanang District of Tanzania together with 1037 birds from eleven villages in Dhading District of Nepal were collected over a period of 21 and 28 days, respectively. Immune responses to FP vaccination were evaluated by local take reactions, while those to ND vaccination were evaluated serologically by haemagglutination inhibition test. The two studies demonstrated that the concurrent vaccination of free-range, indigenous breeds of chicken with live FP and ND vaccines, both administered by non-invasive routes, was safe and induced immunity against FP and ND that were non-inferior to the administration of FP and ND vaccines alone. These findings are important to appropriately trained small-scale backyard poultry farmers as well as to paraprofessionals and community health workers helping to increase vaccine uptake and the control of both FP and ND in low- to middle-income countries. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9508032 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95080322022-09-25 The co-administration of live fowlpox and Newcastle disease vaccines by non-invasive routes to chickens reared by smallholders in Tanzania and Nepal Andrews, Stuart J. Makundi, Asanteli Mwanadota, Julius Shivakoti, Sakar Shah, Bikas Raj Poole, E. Jane Salt, Jeremy Stuke, Kristin Trop Anim Health Prod Regular Articles The co-administration of commercial live fowlpox (FP) and Newcastle disease (ND) vaccines when given by non-invasive (needle-free) routes was demonstrated to be safe and to elicit immunity in two field studies, one in Tanzania the other in Nepal. Both studies were of a cluster-randomised controlled design in which birds were randomly assigned to one of five treatment groups: (i) administration with FP vaccine alone (feather follicle), (ii) administration with ND vaccine alone (eye-drop), (iii) concurrent administration of FP (feather follicle) and ND (eye-drop) vaccines, (iv) concurrent administration of FP (wing-web) and ND (eye-drop) vaccines, and (v) unvaccinated, acting as environmental sentinels. Data from a total of 1167 birds from seven villages in Hanang District of Tanzania together with 1037 birds from eleven villages in Dhading District of Nepal were collected over a period of 21 and 28 days, respectively. Immune responses to FP vaccination were evaluated by local take reactions, while those to ND vaccination were evaluated serologically by haemagglutination inhibition test. The two studies demonstrated that the concurrent vaccination of free-range, indigenous breeds of chicken with live FP and ND vaccines, both administered by non-invasive routes, was safe and induced immunity against FP and ND that were non-inferior to the administration of FP and ND vaccines alone. These findings are important to appropriately trained small-scale backyard poultry farmers as well as to paraprofessionals and community health workers helping to increase vaccine uptake and the control of both FP and ND in low- to middle-income countries. Springer Netherlands 2022-09-23 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9508032/ /pubmed/36149524 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11250-022-03250-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Regular Articles Andrews, Stuart J. Makundi, Asanteli Mwanadota, Julius Shivakoti, Sakar Shah, Bikas Raj Poole, E. Jane Salt, Jeremy Stuke, Kristin The co-administration of live fowlpox and Newcastle disease vaccines by non-invasive routes to chickens reared by smallholders in Tanzania and Nepal |
title | The co-administration of live fowlpox and Newcastle disease vaccines by non-invasive routes to chickens reared by smallholders in Tanzania and Nepal |
title_full | The co-administration of live fowlpox and Newcastle disease vaccines by non-invasive routes to chickens reared by smallholders in Tanzania and Nepal |
title_fullStr | The co-administration of live fowlpox and Newcastle disease vaccines by non-invasive routes to chickens reared by smallholders in Tanzania and Nepal |
title_full_unstemmed | The co-administration of live fowlpox and Newcastle disease vaccines by non-invasive routes to chickens reared by smallholders in Tanzania and Nepal |
title_short | The co-administration of live fowlpox and Newcastle disease vaccines by non-invasive routes to chickens reared by smallholders in Tanzania and Nepal |
title_sort | co-administration of live fowlpox and newcastle disease vaccines by non-invasive routes to chickens reared by smallholders in tanzania and nepal |
topic | Regular Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9508032/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36149524 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11250-022-03250-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andrewsstuartj thecoadministrationoflivefowlpoxandnewcastlediseasevaccinesbynoninvasiveroutestochickensrearedbysmallholdersintanzaniaandnepal AT makundiasanteli thecoadministrationoflivefowlpoxandnewcastlediseasevaccinesbynoninvasiveroutestochickensrearedbysmallholdersintanzaniaandnepal AT mwanadotajulius thecoadministrationoflivefowlpoxandnewcastlediseasevaccinesbynoninvasiveroutestochickensrearedbysmallholdersintanzaniaandnepal AT shivakotisakar thecoadministrationoflivefowlpoxandnewcastlediseasevaccinesbynoninvasiveroutestochickensrearedbysmallholdersintanzaniaandnepal AT shahbikasraj thecoadministrationoflivefowlpoxandnewcastlediseasevaccinesbynoninvasiveroutestochickensrearedbysmallholdersintanzaniaandnepal AT pooleejane thecoadministrationoflivefowlpoxandnewcastlediseasevaccinesbynoninvasiveroutestochickensrearedbysmallholdersintanzaniaandnepal AT saltjeremy thecoadministrationoflivefowlpoxandnewcastlediseasevaccinesbynoninvasiveroutestochickensrearedbysmallholdersintanzaniaandnepal AT stukekristin thecoadministrationoflivefowlpoxandnewcastlediseasevaccinesbynoninvasiveroutestochickensrearedbysmallholdersintanzaniaandnepal AT andrewsstuartj coadministrationoflivefowlpoxandnewcastlediseasevaccinesbynoninvasiveroutestochickensrearedbysmallholdersintanzaniaandnepal AT makundiasanteli coadministrationoflivefowlpoxandnewcastlediseasevaccinesbynoninvasiveroutestochickensrearedbysmallholdersintanzaniaandnepal AT mwanadotajulius coadministrationoflivefowlpoxandnewcastlediseasevaccinesbynoninvasiveroutestochickensrearedbysmallholdersintanzaniaandnepal AT shivakotisakar coadministrationoflivefowlpoxandnewcastlediseasevaccinesbynoninvasiveroutestochickensrearedbysmallholdersintanzaniaandnepal AT shahbikasraj coadministrationoflivefowlpoxandnewcastlediseasevaccinesbynoninvasiveroutestochickensrearedbysmallholdersintanzaniaandnepal AT pooleejane coadministrationoflivefowlpoxandnewcastlediseasevaccinesbynoninvasiveroutestochickensrearedbysmallholdersintanzaniaandnepal AT saltjeremy coadministrationoflivefowlpoxandnewcastlediseasevaccinesbynoninvasiveroutestochickensrearedbysmallholdersintanzaniaandnepal AT stukekristin coadministrationoflivefowlpoxandnewcastlediseasevaccinesbynoninvasiveroutestochickensrearedbysmallholdersintanzaniaandnepal |