Cargando…
Clinical experience with venetoclax in patients with newly diagnosed, relapsed, or refractory acute myeloid leukemia
BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with poor outcome in elderly and unfit patients. Recently, approval of the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax (VEN) in combination with hypo-methylating agents (HMA) led to a significant improvement of response rates and survival. Further,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9508061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35099591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-03930-5 |
_version_ | 1784796938031333376 |
---|---|
author | Fleischmann, Maximilian Scholl, Sebastian Frietsch, Jochen J. Hilgendorf, Inken Schrenk, Karin Hammersen, Jakob Prims, Florian Thiede, Christian Hochhaus, Andreas Schnetzke, Ulf |
author_facet | Fleischmann, Maximilian Scholl, Sebastian Frietsch, Jochen J. Hilgendorf, Inken Schrenk, Karin Hammersen, Jakob Prims, Florian Thiede, Christian Hochhaus, Andreas Schnetzke, Ulf |
author_sort | Fleischmann, Maximilian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with poor outcome in elderly and unfit patients. Recently, approval of the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax (VEN) in combination with hypo-methylating agents (HMA) led to a significant improvement of response rates and survival. Further, application in the relapsed or refractory (r/r) AML setting or in context of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) seems feasible. METHODS AND PATIENTS: Fifty-six consecutive adult AML patients on VEN from January 2019 to June 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients received VEN either as first-line treatment, as subsequent therapy (r/r AML excluding prior alloHSCT), or at relapse after alloHSCT. VEN was administered orally in 28-day cycles either combined with HMA or low-dose cytarabine (LDAC). RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 11.5 (range 6.1–22.3) months, median overall survival (OS) from start of VEN treatment was 13.3 (2.2–20.5) months, 5.0 (0.8–24.3) months and 4.0 (1.5–22.1) months for first-line, subsequent line treatment and at relapse post-alloHSCT, respectively. Median OS was 11.5 (10–22.3) months from start of VEN when subsequent alloHSCT was carried out. Relapse-free survival (RFS) for the total cohort was 10.2 (2.2 – 24.3) months. Overall response rate (composite complete remission + partial remission) was 51.8% for the total cohort (61.1% for VEN first-line treatment, 52.2% for subsequent line and 42.8% at relapse post-alloHSCT). Subgroup analysis revealed a significantly reduced median OS in FLT3-ITD mutated AML with 3.4 (1.9–4.9) months versus 10.4 (0.8–24.3) months for non-mutated cases, (HR 4.45, 95% CI 0.89–22.13, p = 0.0002). Patients harboring NPM1 or IDH1/2 mutations lacking co-occurrence of FLT3-ITD showed a survival advantage over patients without those mutations (11.2 (5–24.3) months versus 5.0 (0.8–22.1) months, respectively, (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.23 – 1.21, p = 0.131). Multivariate analysis revealed mutated NPM1 as a significant prognostic variable for achieving complete remission (CR) (HR 19.14, 95% CI 2.30 – 436.2, p < 0.05). The most common adverse events were hematological, with grade 3 and 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia reported in 44.6% and 14.5% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Detailed analyses on efficacy for common clinical scenarios, such as first-line treatment, subsequent therapy (r/r AML), and application prior to and post-alloHSCT, are presented. The findings suggest VEN treatment combinations efficacious not only in first-line setting but also in r/r AML. Furthermore, VEN might play a role in a subgroup of patients with failure to conventional chemotherapy as a salvage regimen aiming for potential curative alloHSCT. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-022-03930-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9508061 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95080612022-09-25 Clinical experience with venetoclax in patients with newly diagnosed, relapsed, or refractory acute myeloid leukemia Fleischmann, Maximilian Scholl, Sebastian Frietsch, Jochen J. Hilgendorf, Inken Schrenk, Karin Hammersen, Jakob Prims, Florian Thiede, Christian Hochhaus, Andreas Schnetzke, Ulf J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Original Article – Clinical Oncology BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with poor outcome in elderly and unfit patients. Recently, approval of the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax (VEN) in combination with hypo-methylating agents (HMA) led to a significant improvement of response rates and survival. Further, application in the relapsed or refractory (r/r) AML setting or in context of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) seems feasible. METHODS AND PATIENTS: Fifty-six consecutive adult AML patients on VEN from January 2019 to June 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients received VEN either as first-line treatment, as subsequent therapy (r/r AML excluding prior alloHSCT), or at relapse after alloHSCT. VEN was administered orally in 28-day cycles either combined with HMA or low-dose cytarabine (LDAC). RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 11.5 (range 6.1–22.3) months, median overall survival (OS) from start of VEN treatment was 13.3 (2.2–20.5) months, 5.0 (0.8–24.3) months and 4.0 (1.5–22.1) months for first-line, subsequent line treatment and at relapse post-alloHSCT, respectively. Median OS was 11.5 (10–22.3) months from start of VEN when subsequent alloHSCT was carried out. Relapse-free survival (RFS) for the total cohort was 10.2 (2.2 – 24.3) months. Overall response rate (composite complete remission + partial remission) was 51.8% for the total cohort (61.1% for VEN first-line treatment, 52.2% for subsequent line and 42.8% at relapse post-alloHSCT). Subgroup analysis revealed a significantly reduced median OS in FLT3-ITD mutated AML with 3.4 (1.9–4.9) months versus 10.4 (0.8–24.3) months for non-mutated cases, (HR 4.45, 95% CI 0.89–22.13, p = 0.0002). Patients harboring NPM1 or IDH1/2 mutations lacking co-occurrence of FLT3-ITD showed a survival advantage over patients without those mutations (11.2 (5–24.3) months versus 5.0 (0.8–22.1) months, respectively, (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.23 – 1.21, p = 0.131). Multivariate analysis revealed mutated NPM1 as a significant prognostic variable for achieving complete remission (CR) (HR 19.14, 95% CI 2.30 – 436.2, p < 0.05). The most common adverse events were hematological, with grade 3 and 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia reported in 44.6% and 14.5% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Detailed analyses on efficacy for common clinical scenarios, such as first-line treatment, subsequent therapy (r/r AML), and application prior to and post-alloHSCT, are presented. The findings suggest VEN treatment combinations efficacious not only in first-line setting but also in r/r AML. Furthermore, VEN might play a role in a subgroup of patients with failure to conventional chemotherapy as a salvage regimen aiming for potential curative alloHSCT. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-022-03930-5. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-01-31 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9508061/ /pubmed/35099591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-03930-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article – Clinical Oncology Fleischmann, Maximilian Scholl, Sebastian Frietsch, Jochen J. Hilgendorf, Inken Schrenk, Karin Hammersen, Jakob Prims, Florian Thiede, Christian Hochhaus, Andreas Schnetzke, Ulf Clinical experience with venetoclax in patients with newly diagnosed, relapsed, or refractory acute myeloid leukemia |
title | Clinical experience with venetoclax in patients with newly diagnosed, relapsed, or refractory acute myeloid leukemia |
title_full | Clinical experience with venetoclax in patients with newly diagnosed, relapsed, or refractory acute myeloid leukemia |
title_fullStr | Clinical experience with venetoclax in patients with newly diagnosed, relapsed, or refractory acute myeloid leukemia |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical experience with venetoclax in patients with newly diagnosed, relapsed, or refractory acute myeloid leukemia |
title_short | Clinical experience with venetoclax in patients with newly diagnosed, relapsed, or refractory acute myeloid leukemia |
title_sort | clinical experience with venetoclax in patients with newly diagnosed, relapsed, or refractory acute myeloid leukemia |
topic | Original Article – Clinical Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9508061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35099591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-03930-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fleischmannmaximilian clinicalexperiencewithvenetoclaxinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedrelapsedorrefractoryacutemyeloidleukemia AT schollsebastian clinicalexperiencewithvenetoclaxinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedrelapsedorrefractoryacutemyeloidleukemia AT frietschjochenj clinicalexperiencewithvenetoclaxinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedrelapsedorrefractoryacutemyeloidleukemia AT hilgendorfinken clinicalexperiencewithvenetoclaxinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedrelapsedorrefractoryacutemyeloidleukemia AT schrenkkarin clinicalexperiencewithvenetoclaxinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedrelapsedorrefractoryacutemyeloidleukemia AT hammersenjakob clinicalexperiencewithvenetoclaxinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedrelapsedorrefractoryacutemyeloidleukemia AT primsflorian clinicalexperiencewithvenetoclaxinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedrelapsedorrefractoryacutemyeloidleukemia AT thiedechristian clinicalexperiencewithvenetoclaxinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedrelapsedorrefractoryacutemyeloidleukemia AT hochhausandreas clinicalexperiencewithvenetoclaxinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedrelapsedorrefractoryacutemyeloidleukemia AT schnetzkeulf clinicalexperiencewithvenetoclaxinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedrelapsedorrefractoryacutemyeloidleukemia |