Cargando…

Clinical experience with venetoclax in patients with newly diagnosed, relapsed, or refractory acute myeloid leukemia

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with poor outcome in elderly and unfit patients. Recently, approval of the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax (VEN) in combination with hypo-methylating agents (HMA) led to a significant improvement of response rates and survival. Further,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fleischmann, Maximilian, Scholl, Sebastian, Frietsch, Jochen J., Hilgendorf, Inken, Schrenk, Karin, Hammersen, Jakob, Prims, Florian, Thiede, Christian, Hochhaus, Andreas, Schnetzke, Ulf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9508061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35099591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-03930-5
_version_ 1784796938031333376
author Fleischmann, Maximilian
Scholl, Sebastian
Frietsch, Jochen J.
Hilgendorf, Inken
Schrenk, Karin
Hammersen, Jakob
Prims, Florian
Thiede, Christian
Hochhaus, Andreas
Schnetzke, Ulf
author_facet Fleischmann, Maximilian
Scholl, Sebastian
Frietsch, Jochen J.
Hilgendorf, Inken
Schrenk, Karin
Hammersen, Jakob
Prims, Florian
Thiede, Christian
Hochhaus, Andreas
Schnetzke, Ulf
author_sort Fleischmann, Maximilian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with poor outcome in elderly and unfit patients. Recently, approval of the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax (VEN) in combination with hypo-methylating agents (HMA) led to a significant improvement of response rates and survival. Further, application in the relapsed or refractory (r/r) AML setting or in context of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) seems feasible. METHODS AND PATIENTS: Fifty-six consecutive adult AML patients on VEN from January 2019 to June 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients received VEN either as first-line treatment, as subsequent therapy (r/r AML excluding prior alloHSCT), or at relapse after alloHSCT. VEN was administered orally in 28-day cycles either combined with HMA or low-dose cytarabine (LDAC). RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 11.5 (range 6.1–22.3) months, median overall survival (OS) from start of VEN treatment was 13.3 (2.2–20.5) months, 5.0 (0.8–24.3) months and 4.0 (1.5–22.1) months for first-line, subsequent line treatment and at relapse post-alloHSCT, respectively. Median OS was 11.5 (10–22.3) months from start of VEN when subsequent alloHSCT was carried out. Relapse-free survival (RFS) for the total cohort was 10.2 (2.2 – 24.3) months. Overall response rate (composite complete remission + partial remission) was 51.8% for the total cohort (61.1% for VEN first-line treatment, 52.2% for subsequent line and 42.8% at relapse post-alloHSCT). Subgroup analysis revealed a significantly reduced median OS in FLT3-ITD mutated AML with 3.4 (1.9–4.9) months versus 10.4 (0.8–24.3) months for non-mutated cases, (HR 4.45, 95% CI 0.89–22.13, p = 0.0002). Patients harboring NPM1 or IDH1/2 mutations lacking co-occurrence of FLT3-ITD showed a survival advantage over patients without those mutations (11.2 (5–24.3) months versus 5.0 (0.8–22.1) months, respectively, (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.23 – 1.21, p = 0.131). Multivariate analysis revealed mutated NPM1 as a significant prognostic variable for achieving complete remission (CR) (HR 19.14, 95% CI 2.30 – 436.2, p < 0.05). The most common adverse events were hematological, with grade 3 and 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia reported in 44.6% and 14.5% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Detailed analyses on efficacy for common clinical scenarios, such as first-line treatment, subsequent therapy (r/r AML), and application prior to and post-alloHSCT, are presented. The findings suggest VEN treatment combinations efficacious not only in first-line setting but also in r/r AML. Furthermore, VEN might play a role in a subgroup of patients with failure to conventional chemotherapy as a salvage regimen aiming for potential curative alloHSCT. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-022-03930-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9508061
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95080612022-09-25 Clinical experience with venetoclax in patients with newly diagnosed, relapsed, or refractory acute myeloid leukemia Fleischmann, Maximilian Scholl, Sebastian Frietsch, Jochen J. Hilgendorf, Inken Schrenk, Karin Hammersen, Jakob Prims, Florian Thiede, Christian Hochhaus, Andreas Schnetzke, Ulf J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Original Article – Clinical Oncology BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with poor outcome in elderly and unfit patients. Recently, approval of the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax (VEN) in combination with hypo-methylating agents (HMA) led to a significant improvement of response rates and survival. Further, application in the relapsed or refractory (r/r) AML setting or in context of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) seems feasible. METHODS AND PATIENTS: Fifty-six consecutive adult AML patients on VEN from January 2019 to June 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients received VEN either as first-line treatment, as subsequent therapy (r/r AML excluding prior alloHSCT), or at relapse after alloHSCT. VEN was administered orally in 28-day cycles either combined with HMA or low-dose cytarabine (LDAC). RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 11.5 (range 6.1–22.3) months, median overall survival (OS) from start of VEN treatment was 13.3 (2.2–20.5) months, 5.0 (0.8–24.3) months and 4.0 (1.5–22.1) months for first-line, subsequent line treatment and at relapse post-alloHSCT, respectively. Median OS was 11.5 (10–22.3) months from start of VEN when subsequent alloHSCT was carried out. Relapse-free survival (RFS) for the total cohort was 10.2 (2.2 – 24.3) months. Overall response rate (composite complete remission + partial remission) was 51.8% for the total cohort (61.1% for VEN first-line treatment, 52.2% for subsequent line and 42.8% at relapse post-alloHSCT). Subgroup analysis revealed a significantly reduced median OS in FLT3-ITD mutated AML with 3.4 (1.9–4.9) months versus 10.4 (0.8–24.3) months for non-mutated cases, (HR 4.45, 95% CI 0.89–22.13, p = 0.0002). Patients harboring NPM1 or IDH1/2 mutations lacking co-occurrence of FLT3-ITD showed a survival advantage over patients without those mutations (11.2 (5–24.3) months versus 5.0 (0.8–22.1) months, respectively, (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.23 – 1.21, p = 0.131). Multivariate analysis revealed mutated NPM1 as a significant prognostic variable for achieving complete remission (CR) (HR 19.14, 95% CI 2.30 – 436.2, p < 0.05). The most common adverse events were hematological, with grade 3 and 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia reported in 44.6% and 14.5% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Detailed analyses on efficacy for common clinical scenarios, such as first-line treatment, subsequent therapy (r/r AML), and application prior to and post-alloHSCT, are presented. The findings suggest VEN treatment combinations efficacious not only in first-line setting but also in r/r AML. Furthermore, VEN might play a role in a subgroup of patients with failure to conventional chemotherapy as a salvage regimen aiming for potential curative alloHSCT. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-022-03930-5. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-01-31 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9508061/ /pubmed/35099591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-03930-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article – Clinical Oncology
Fleischmann, Maximilian
Scholl, Sebastian
Frietsch, Jochen J.
Hilgendorf, Inken
Schrenk, Karin
Hammersen, Jakob
Prims, Florian
Thiede, Christian
Hochhaus, Andreas
Schnetzke, Ulf
Clinical experience with venetoclax in patients with newly diagnosed, relapsed, or refractory acute myeloid leukemia
title Clinical experience with venetoclax in patients with newly diagnosed, relapsed, or refractory acute myeloid leukemia
title_full Clinical experience with venetoclax in patients with newly diagnosed, relapsed, or refractory acute myeloid leukemia
title_fullStr Clinical experience with venetoclax in patients with newly diagnosed, relapsed, or refractory acute myeloid leukemia
title_full_unstemmed Clinical experience with venetoclax in patients with newly diagnosed, relapsed, or refractory acute myeloid leukemia
title_short Clinical experience with venetoclax in patients with newly diagnosed, relapsed, or refractory acute myeloid leukemia
title_sort clinical experience with venetoclax in patients with newly diagnosed, relapsed, or refractory acute myeloid leukemia
topic Original Article – Clinical Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9508061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35099591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-03930-5
work_keys_str_mv AT fleischmannmaximilian clinicalexperiencewithvenetoclaxinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedrelapsedorrefractoryacutemyeloidleukemia
AT schollsebastian clinicalexperiencewithvenetoclaxinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedrelapsedorrefractoryacutemyeloidleukemia
AT frietschjochenj clinicalexperiencewithvenetoclaxinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedrelapsedorrefractoryacutemyeloidleukemia
AT hilgendorfinken clinicalexperiencewithvenetoclaxinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedrelapsedorrefractoryacutemyeloidleukemia
AT schrenkkarin clinicalexperiencewithvenetoclaxinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedrelapsedorrefractoryacutemyeloidleukemia
AT hammersenjakob clinicalexperiencewithvenetoclaxinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedrelapsedorrefractoryacutemyeloidleukemia
AT primsflorian clinicalexperiencewithvenetoclaxinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedrelapsedorrefractoryacutemyeloidleukemia
AT thiedechristian clinicalexperiencewithvenetoclaxinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedrelapsedorrefractoryacutemyeloidleukemia
AT hochhausandreas clinicalexperiencewithvenetoclaxinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedrelapsedorrefractoryacutemyeloidleukemia
AT schnetzkeulf clinicalexperiencewithvenetoclaxinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedrelapsedorrefractoryacutemyeloidleukemia