Cargando…

Virtual reality and augmented reality in radiation oncology education – A review and expert commentary

The field of radiation oncology is rapidly advancing through technological and biomedical innovation backed by robust research evidence. However, cancer professionals are notoriously time-poor, meaning there is a need for high quality, accessible and tailored oncologic education programs. While trad...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kok, David L., Dushyanthen, Sathana, Peters, Gabrielle, Sapkaroski, Daniel, Barrett, Michelle, Sim, Jenny, Eriksen, Jesper Grau
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9508152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36164438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2022.08.007
_version_ 1784796959305891840
author Kok, David L.
Dushyanthen, Sathana
Peters, Gabrielle
Sapkaroski, Daniel
Barrett, Michelle
Sim, Jenny
Eriksen, Jesper Grau
author_facet Kok, David L.
Dushyanthen, Sathana
Peters, Gabrielle
Sapkaroski, Daniel
Barrett, Michelle
Sim, Jenny
Eriksen, Jesper Grau
author_sort Kok, David L.
collection PubMed
description The field of radiation oncology is rapidly advancing through technological and biomedical innovation backed by robust research evidence. However, cancer professionals are notoriously time-poor, meaning there is a need for high quality, accessible and tailored oncologic education programs. While traditional teaching methods including lectures and other in-person delivery formats remain important, digital learning (DL) has provided additional teaching options that can be delivered flexibly and on-demand from anywhere in the world. While evidence of this digital migration has been evident for some time now, it has not always been met with the same enthusiasm by the teaching community, in part due to questions about its pedagogical effectiveness. Many of these reservations have been driven by a rudimentary utilisation of the medium and inexperience with digital best-practice. With increasing familiarity and understanding of the medium, increasingly sophisticated and pedagogically-driven learning solutions can be produced. This article will review the application of immersive digital learning tools in radiation oncology education. This includes first and second-generation Virtual Reality (VR) environments and Augmented Reality (AR). It will explore the data behind, and best-practice application of, each of these tools as well as giving practical tips for educators who are looking to implement (or refine) their use of these learning methods. It includes a discussion of how to match the digital learning methods to the content being taught and ends with a horizon scan of where the digital medium may take us in the future. This article is the second in a two-part series, with the companion piece being on Screen-Based Digital Learning Methods in Radiation Oncology. Overall, the digital space is well-placed to cater to the evolving educational needs of oncology learners. Further uptake over the next decade is likely to be driven by the desire for flexible on demand delivery, high-yield products, engaging delivery methods and programs that are tailored to individual learning needs. Educational programs that embrace these principles will have unique opportunities to thrive in this space.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9508152
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95081522022-09-25 Virtual reality and augmented reality in radiation oncology education – A review and expert commentary Kok, David L. Dushyanthen, Sathana Peters, Gabrielle Sapkaroski, Daniel Barrett, Michelle Sim, Jenny Eriksen, Jesper Grau Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol Virtual Special Issue on: Global trend in radiation oncology education; Edited by Sandra Turner, Mora Mel and Daniel Golden The field of radiation oncology is rapidly advancing through technological and biomedical innovation backed by robust research evidence. However, cancer professionals are notoriously time-poor, meaning there is a need for high quality, accessible and tailored oncologic education programs. While traditional teaching methods including lectures and other in-person delivery formats remain important, digital learning (DL) has provided additional teaching options that can be delivered flexibly and on-demand from anywhere in the world. While evidence of this digital migration has been evident for some time now, it has not always been met with the same enthusiasm by the teaching community, in part due to questions about its pedagogical effectiveness. Many of these reservations have been driven by a rudimentary utilisation of the medium and inexperience with digital best-practice. With increasing familiarity and understanding of the medium, increasingly sophisticated and pedagogically-driven learning solutions can be produced. This article will review the application of immersive digital learning tools in radiation oncology education. This includes first and second-generation Virtual Reality (VR) environments and Augmented Reality (AR). It will explore the data behind, and best-practice application of, each of these tools as well as giving practical tips for educators who are looking to implement (or refine) their use of these learning methods. It includes a discussion of how to match the digital learning methods to the content being taught and ends with a horizon scan of where the digital medium may take us in the future. This article is the second in a two-part series, with the companion piece being on Screen-Based Digital Learning Methods in Radiation Oncology. Overall, the digital space is well-placed to cater to the evolving educational needs of oncology learners. Further uptake over the next decade is likely to be driven by the desire for flexible on demand delivery, high-yield products, engaging delivery methods and programs that are tailored to individual learning needs. Educational programs that embrace these principles will have unique opportunities to thrive in this space. Elsevier 2022-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9508152/ /pubmed/36164438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2022.08.007 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Society for Radiotherapy & Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Virtual Special Issue on: Global trend in radiation oncology education; Edited by Sandra Turner, Mora Mel and Daniel Golden
Kok, David L.
Dushyanthen, Sathana
Peters, Gabrielle
Sapkaroski, Daniel
Barrett, Michelle
Sim, Jenny
Eriksen, Jesper Grau
Virtual reality and augmented reality in radiation oncology education – A review and expert commentary
title Virtual reality and augmented reality in radiation oncology education – A review and expert commentary
title_full Virtual reality and augmented reality in radiation oncology education – A review and expert commentary
title_fullStr Virtual reality and augmented reality in radiation oncology education – A review and expert commentary
title_full_unstemmed Virtual reality and augmented reality in radiation oncology education – A review and expert commentary
title_short Virtual reality and augmented reality in radiation oncology education – A review and expert commentary
title_sort virtual reality and augmented reality in radiation oncology education – a review and expert commentary
topic Virtual Special Issue on: Global trend in radiation oncology education; Edited by Sandra Turner, Mora Mel and Daniel Golden
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9508152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36164438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2022.08.007
work_keys_str_mv AT kokdavidl virtualrealityandaugmentedrealityinradiationoncologyeducationareviewandexpertcommentary
AT dushyanthensathana virtualrealityandaugmentedrealityinradiationoncologyeducationareviewandexpertcommentary
AT petersgabrielle virtualrealityandaugmentedrealityinradiationoncologyeducationareviewandexpertcommentary
AT sapkaroskidaniel virtualrealityandaugmentedrealityinradiationoncologyeducationareviewandexpertcommentary
AT barrettmichelle virtualrealityandaugmentedrealityinradiationoncologyeducationareviewandexpertcommentary
AT simjenny virtualrealityandaugmentedrealityinradiationoncologyeducationareviewandexpertcommentary
AT eriksenjespergrau virtualrealityandaugmentedrealityinradiationoncologyeducationareviewandexpertcommentary