Cargando…
Forecasting admissions in psychiatric hospitals before and during Covid-19: a retrospective study with routine data
The COVID-19 pandemic has strong effects on most health care systems. Forecasting of admissions can help for the efficient organisation of hospital care. We aimed to forecast the number of admissions to psychiatric hospitals before and during the COVID-19 pandemic and we compared the performance of...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9508170/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36151267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20190-y |
_version_ | 1784796963609247744 |
---|---|
author | Wolff, J. Klimke, A. Marschollek, M. Kacprowski, T. |
author_facet | Wolff, J. Klimke, A. Marschollek, M. Kacprowski, T. |
author_sort | Wolff, J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The COVID-19 pandemic has strong effects on most health care systems. Forecasting of admissions can help for the efficient organisation of hospital care. We aimed to forecast the number of admissions to psychiatric hospitals before and during the COVID-19 pandemic and we compared the performance of machine learning models and time series models. This would eventually allow to support timely resource allocation for optimal treatment of patients. We used admission data from 9 psychiatric hospitals in Germany between 2017 and 2020. We compared machine learning models with time series models in weekly, monthly and yearly forecasting before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. A total of 90,686 admissions were analysed. The models explained up to 90% of variance in hospital admissions in 2019 and 75% in 2020 with the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. The best models substantially outperformed a one-step seasonal naïve forecast (seasonal mean absolute scaled error (sMASE) 2019: 0.59, 2020: 0.76). The best model in 2019 was a machine learning model (elastic net, mean absolute error (MAE): 7.25). The best model in 2020 was a time series model (exponential smoothing state space model with Box-Cox transformation, ARMA errors and trend and seasonal components, MAE: 10.44). Models forecasting admissions one week in advance did not perform better than monthly and yearly models in 2019 but they did in 2020. The most important features for the machine learning models were calendrical variables. Model performance did not vary much between different modelling approaches before the COVID-19 pandemic and established forecasts were substantially better than one-step seasonal naïve forecasts. However, weekly time series models adjusted quicker to the COVID-19 related shock effects. In practice, multiple individual forecast horizons could be used simultaneously, such as a yearly model to achieve early forecasts for a long planning period and weekly models to adjust quicker to sudden changes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9508170 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95081702022-09-25 Forecasting admissions in psychiatric hospitals before and during Covid-19: a retrospective study with routine data Wolff, J. Klimke, A. Marschollek, M. Kacprowski, T. Sci Rep Article The COVID-19 pandemic has strong effects on most health care systems. Forecasting of admissions can help for the efficient organisation of hospital care. We aimed to forecast the number of admissions to psychiatric hospitals before and during the COVID-19 pandemic and we compared the performance of machine learning models and time series models. This would eventually allow to support timely resource allocation for optimal treatment of patients. We used admission data from 9 psychiatric hospitals in Germany between 2017 and 2020. We compared machine learning models with time series models in weekly, monthly and yearly forecasting before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. A total of 90,686 admissions were analysed. The models explained up to 90% of variance in hospital admissions in 2019 and 75% in 2020 with the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. The best models substantially outperformed a one-step seasonal naïve forecast (seasonal mean absolute scaled error (sMASE) 2019: 0.59, 2020: 0.76). The best model in 2019 was a machine learning model (elastic net, mean absolute error (MAE): 7.25). The best model in 2020 was a time series model (exponential smoothing state space model with Box-Cox transformation, ARMA errors and trend and seasonal components, MAE: 10.44). Models forecasting admissions one week in advance did not perform better than monthly and yearly models in 2019 but they did in 2020. The most important features for the machine learning models were calendrical variables. Model performance did not vary much between different modelling approaches before the COVID-19 pandemic and established forecasts were substantially better than one-step seasonal naïve forecasts. However, weekly time series models adjusted quicker to the COVID-19 related shock effects. In practice, multiple individual forecast horizons could be used simultaneously, such as a yearly model to achieve early forecasts for a long planning period and weekly models to adjust quicker to sudden changes. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9508170/ /pubmed/36151267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20190-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Wolff, J. Klimke, A. Marschollek, M. Kacprowski, T. Forecasting admissions in psychiatric hospitals before and during Covid-19: a retrospective study with routine data |
title | Forecasting admissions in psychiatric hospitals before and during Covid-19: a retrospective study with routine data |
title_full | Forecasting admissions in psychiatric hospitals before and during Covid-19: a retrospective study with routine data |
title_fullStr | Forecasting admissions in psychiatric hospitals before and during Covid-19: a retrospective study with routine data |
title_full_unstemmed | Forecasting admissions in psychiatric hospitals before and during Covid-19: a retrospective study with routine data |
title_short | Forecasting admissions in psychiatric hospitals before and during Covid-19: a retrospective study with routine data |
title_sort | forecasting admissions in psychiatric hospitals before and during covid-19: a retrospective study with routine data |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9508170/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36151267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20190-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wolffj forecastingadmissionsinpsychiatrichospitalsbeforeandduringcovid19aretrospectivestudywithroutinedata AT klimkea forecastingadmissionsinpsychiatrichospitalsbeforeandduringcovid19aretrospectivestudywithroutinedata AT marschollekm forecastingadmissionsinpsychiatrichospitalsbeforeandduringcovid19aretrospectivestudywithroutinedata AT kacprowskit forecastingadmissionsinpsychiatrichospitalsbeforeandduringcovid19aretrospectivestudywithroutinedata |