Cargando…

A novel integrated MADM method for design concept evaluation

Design concept evaluation plays a significant role in new product development. Rough set based methods are regarded as effective evaluation techniques when facing a vague and uncertain environment and are widely used in product research and development. This paper proposed an improved rough-TOPSIS m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Zhe, Zhong, Peisi, Liu, Mei, Ma, Qing, Si, Guangyao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9508270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36151244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20044-7
_version_ 1784796986552090624
author Chen, Zhe
Zhong, Peisi
Liu, Mei
Ma, Qing
Si, Guangyao
author_facet Chen, Zhe
Zhong, Peisi
Liu, Mei
Ma, Qing
Si, Guangyao
author_sort Chen, Zhe
collection PubMed
description Design concept evaluation plays a significant role in new product development. Rough set based methods are regarded as effective evaluation techniques when facing a vague and uncertain environment and are widely used in product research and development. This paper proposed an improved rough-TOPSIS method, which aims to reduce the imprecision of design concept evaluation in two ways. First, the expert group for design concept evaluation is classified into three clusters: designers, manufacturers, and customers. The cluster weight is determined by roles in the assessment using a Multiplicative Analytic Hierarchy Process method. Second, the raw information collection method is improved with a 3-step process, and both design values and expert linguistic preferences are integrated into the rough decision matrix. The alternatives are then ranked with a rough-TOPSIS method with entropy criteria weight. A practical example is shown to demonstrate the method’s viability. The findings suggest that the proposed decision-making process is effective in product concept design evaluation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9508270
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95082702022-09-25 A novel integrated MADM method for design concept evaluation Chen, Zhe Zhong, Peisi Liu, Mei Ma, Qing Si, Guangyao Sci Rep Article Design concept evaluation plays a significant role in new product development. Rough set based methods are regarded as effective evaluation techniques when facing a vague and uncertain environment and are widely used in product research and development. This paper proposed an improved rough-TOPSIS method, which aims to reduce the imprecision of design concept evaluation in two ways. First, the expert group for design concept evaluation is classified into three clusters: designers, manufacturers, and customers. The cluster weight is determined by roles in the assessment using a Multiplicative Analytic Hierarchy Process method. Second, the raw information collection method is improved with a 3-step process, and both design values and expert linguistic preferences are integrated into the rough decision matrix. The alternatives are then ranked with a rough-TOPSIS method with entropy criteria weight. A practical example is shown to demonstrate the method’s viability. The findings suggest that the proposed decision-making process is effective in product concept design evaluation. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9508270/ /pubmed/36151244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20044-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Chen, Zhe
Zhong, Peisi
Liu, Mei
Ma, Qing
Si, Guangyao
A novel integrated MADM method for design concept evaluation
title A novel integrated MADM method for design concept evaluation
title_full A novel integrated MADM method for design concept evaluation
title_fullStr A novel integrated MADM method for design concept evaluation
title_full_unstemmed A novel integrated MADM method for design concept evaluation
title_short A novel integrated MADM method for design concept evaluation
title_sort novel integrated madm method for design concept evaluation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9508270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36151244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20044-7
work_keys_str_mv AT chenzhe anovelintegratedmadmmethodfordesignconceptevaluation
AT zhongpeisi anovelintegratedmadmmethodfordesignconceptevaluation
AT liumei anovelintegratedmadmmethodfordesignconceptevaluation
AT maqing anovelintegratedmadmmethodfordesignconceptevaluation
AT siguangyao anovelintegratedmadmmethodfordesignconceptevaluation
AT chenzhe novelintegratedmadmmethodfordesignconceptevaluation
AT zhongpeisi novelintegratedmadmmethodfordesignconceptevaluation
AT liumei novelintegratedmadmmethodfordesignconceptevaluation
AT maqing novelintegratedmadmmethodfordesignconceptevaluation
AT siguangyao novelintegratedmadmmethodfordesignconceptevaluation