Cargando…

Constructing internal audit quality evaluation index: evidence from listed companies in Jiangsu province, China

Internal audit quality is the foundation for a company's survival and development across the world. As a result, global efforts have been made to develop a scientific and accurate evaluation index for internal audit quality. However, literature shows that existing internal audit quality evaluat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kai, Ren, Yusheng, Kong, Ntarmah, Albert Henry, Ti, Chen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9508423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36164523
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10598
_version_ 1784797014951723008
author Kai, Ren
Yusheng, Kong
Ntarmah, Albert Henry
Ti, Chen
author_facet Kai, Ren
Yusheng, Kong
Ntarmah, Albert Henry
Ti, Chen
author_sort Kai, Ren
collection PubMed
description Internal audit quality is the foundation for a company's survival and development across the world. As a result, global efforts have been made to develop a scientific and accurate evaluation index for internal audit quality. However, literature shows that existing internal audit quality evaluation indices have many flaws, such as a lack of systematic internal audit evaluation indicators, poor execution, and inability to identify priority areas. To address gaps in the literature, this study intended to construct an internal audit quality evaluation index utilizing the joint approaches of the Balanced Scorecard, Delphi Process, and Analytical Hierarchy Process. A systematic literature review, examination of companies' internal audit guidelines, Balanced Scorecard, and Delphi approaches resulted in a multilevel internal audit quality evaluation index with five dimensions (stakeholder satisfaction, stakeholder contribution, financial results, internal audit process, and learning and growth) and 36 indicators. The Analytical Hierarchy Process revealed that the most prioritized dimension is the internal audit process. The consistency ratio and evaluation feedback from the listed companies' internal auditors, management, and audit committee members revealed that the results are valid and reliable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9508423
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95084232022-09-25 Constructing internal audit quality evaluation index: evidence from listed companies in Jiangsu province, China Kai, Ren Yusheng, Kong Ntarmah, Albert Henry Ti, Chen Heliyon Research Article Internal audit quality is the foundation for a company's survival and development across the world. As a result, global efforts have been made to develop a scientific and accurate evaluation index for internal audit quality. However, literature shows that existing internal audit quality evaluation indices have many flaws, such as a lack of systematic internal audit evaluation indicators, poor execution, and inability to identify priority areas. To address gaps in the literature, this study intended to construct an internal audit quality evaluation index utilizing the joint approaches of the Balanced Scorecard, Delphi Process, and Analytical Hierarchy Process. A systematic literature review, examination of companies' internal audit guidelines, Balanced Scorecard, and Delphi approaches resulted in a multilevel internal audit quality evaluation index with five dimensions (stakeholder satisfaction, stakeholder contribution, financial results, internal audit process, and learning and growth) and 36 indicators. The Analytical Hierarchy Process revealed that the most prioritized dimension is the internal audit process. The consistency ratio and evaluation feedback from the listed companies' internal auditors, management, and audit committee members revealed that the results are valid and reliable. Elsevier 2022-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9508423/ /pubmed/36164523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10598 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Kai, Ren
Yusheng, Kong
Ntarmah, Albert Henry
Ti, Chen
Constructing internal audit quality evaluation index: evidence from listed companies in Jiangsu province, China
title Constructing internal audit quality evaluation index: evidence from listed companies in Jiangsu province, China
title_full Constructing internal audit quality evaluation index: evidence from listed companies in Jiangsu province, China
title_fullStr Constructing internal audit quality evaluation index: evidence from listed companies in Jiangsu province, China
title_full_unstemmed Constructing internal audit quality evaluation index: evidence from listed companies in Jiangsu province, China
title_short Constructing internal audit quality evaluation index: evidence from listed companies in Jiangsu province, China
title_sort constructing internal audit quality evaluation index: evidence from listed companies in jiangsu province, china
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9508423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36164523
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10598
work_keys_str_mv AT kairen constructinginternalauditqualityevaluationindexevidencefromlistedcompaniesinjiangsuprovincechina
AT yushengkong constructinginternalauditqualityevaluationindexevidencefromlistedcompaniesinjiangsuprovincechina
AT ntarmahalberthenry constructinginternalauditqualityevaluationindexevidencefromlistedcompaniesinjiangsuprovincechina
AT tichen constructinginternalauditqualityevaluationindexevidencefromlistedcompaniesinjiangsuprovincechina