Cargando…
Accuracy of Paris 2016 System for Non-invasive Diagnosis Bladder Malignancy
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology (TPS) is a new method for evaluating urinary cytology designed to reduce unreproducible reports. The aim of this study was to reclassify and compare urinary cytology reports with TPS criteria to determine the frequency of un...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Iranian Society of Pathology
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9508540/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36247512 http://dx.doi.org/10.30699/IJP.2022.548036.2833 |
_version_ | 1784797041065459712 |
---|---|
author | Rakhshan, Azadeh Arvin, Esmat Alahyari, Sam Kazeminegad, Behrang Mollasharifi, Tahmineh Bagheri, Alireza Aliakbari, Fereshteh Hosseini, Seyed Jalil Soleimani, Mohammad Ahadi, Mahsa Jamali, Elena Moradi, Afshin Sadeghzadeh, Zahra Ghiasi, Saleh Nasiri, Malihe Allameh, Farzad |
author_facet | Rakhshan, Azadeh Arvin, Esmat Alahyari, Sam Kazeminegad, Behrang Mollasharifi, Tahmineh Bagheri, Alireza Aliakbari, Fereshteh Hosseini, Seyed Jalil Soleimani, Mohammad Ahadi, Mahsa Jamali, Elena Moradi, Afshin Sadeghzadeh, Zahra Ghiasi, Saleh Nasiri, Malihe Allameh, Farzad |
author_sort | Rakhshan, Azadeh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology (TPS) is a new method for evaluating urinary cytology designed to reduce unreproducible reports. The aim of this study was to reclassify and compare urinary cytology reports with TPS criteria to determine the frequency of unreproducible reports compared to the previous system. METHODS: In this study, the laboratory electronic registration system analyzed patients' urine samples taken by voided or washing and brushing methods. The cytological evaluation was performed considering the previous system and TPS by a pathologist. The results of the two systems were compared, and the sensitivity and specificity of TPS were calculated. RESULTS: Urine samples were taken from 876 patients. The mean age of patients was 63.36 ± 12.62. Comparing the routine classification system and TPS, it was observed that the number of atypical reports in the TPS system decreased by 12%, and all of these cases were downgraded to the negative group in the new classification. The sensitivity and specificity of TPS were 29.4% and 95.1%, respectively, if suspected malignancy and positive reports for malignancy were considered. Finally, if positive reports for malignancy were selected, sensitivity and specificity changed to 11.8% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although the TPS system has low sensitivity for the diagnosis of urothelial malignancies, due to its high specificity, it is possible to consider and use this classification for screening patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9508540 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Iranian Society of Pathology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95085402022-10-13 Accuracy of Paris 2016 System for Non-invasive Diagnosis Bladder Malignancy Rakhshan, Azadeh Arvin, Esmat Alahyari, Sam Kazeminegad, Behrang Mollasharifi, Tahmineh Bagheri, Alireza Aliakbari, Fereshteh Hosseini, Seyed Jalil Soleimani, Mohammad Ahadi, Mahsa Jamali, Elena Moradi, Afshin Sadeghzadeh, Zahra Ghiasi, Saleh Nasiri, Malihe Allameh, Farzad Iran J Pathol Original Article BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology (TPS) is a new method for evaluating urinary cytology designed to reduce unreproducible reports. The aim of this study was to reclassify and compare urinary cytology reports with TPS criteria to determine the frequency of unreproducible reports compared to the previous system. METHODS: In this study, the laboratory electronic registration system analyzed patients' urine samples taken by voided or washing and brushing methods. The cytological evaluation was performed considering the previous system and TPS by a pathologist. The results of the two systems were compared, and the sensitivity and specificity of TPS were calculated. RESULTS: Urine samples were taken from 876 patients. The mean age of patients was 63.36 ± 12.62. Comparing the routine classification system and TPS, it was observed that the number of atypical reports in the TPS system decreased by 12%, and all of these cases were downgraded to the negative group in the new classification. The sensitivity and specificity of TPS were 29.4% and 95.1%, respectively, if suspected malignancy and positive reports for malignancy were considered. Finally, if positive reports for malignancy were selected, sensitivity and specificity changed to 11.8% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although the TPS system has low sensitivity for the diagnosis of urothelial malignancies, due to its high specificity, it is possible to consider and use this classification for screening patients. Iranian Society of Pathology 2022 2022-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9508540/ /pubmed/36247512 http://dx.doi.org/10.30699/IJP.2022.548036.2833 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution- 4.0 International License which permits Share, copy and redistribution of the material in any medium or format or adapt, remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Article Rakhshan, Azadeh Arvin, Esmat Alahyari, Sam Kazeminegad, Behrang Mollasharifi, Tahmineh Bagheri, Alireza Aliakbari, Fereshteh Hosseini, Seyed Jalil Soleimani, Mohammad Ahadi, Mahsa Jamali, Elena Moradi, Afshin Sadeghzadeh, Zahra Ghiasi, Saleh Nasiri, Malihe Allameh, Farzad Accuracy of Paris 2016 System for Non-invasive Diagnosis Bladder Malignancy |
title | Accuracy of Paris 2016 System for Non-invasive Diagnosis Bladder Malignancy |
title_full | Accuracy of Paris 2016 System for Non-invasive Diagnosis Bladder Malignancy |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of Paris 2016 System for Non-invasive Diagnosis Bladder Malignancy |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of Paris 2016 System for Non-invasive Diagnosis Bladder Malignancy |
title_short | Accuracy of Paris 2016 System for Non-invasive Diagnosis Bladder Malignancy |
title_sort | accuracy of paris 2016 system for non-invasive diagnosis bladder malignancy |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9508540/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36247512 http://dx.doi.org/10.30699/IJP.2022.548036.2833 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rakhshanazadeh accuracyofparis2016systemfornoninvasivediagnosisbladdermalignancy AT arvinesmat accuracyofparis2016systemfornoninvasivediagnosisbladdermalignancy AT alahyarisam accuracyofparis2016systemfornoninvasivediagnosisbladdermalignancy AT kazeminegadbehrang accuracyofparis2016systemfornoninvasivediagnosisbladdermalignancy AT mollasharifitahmineh accuracyofparis2016systemfornoninvasivediagnosisbladdermalignancy AT bagherialireza accuracyofparis2016systemfornoninvasivediagnosisbladdermalignancy AT aliakbarifereshteh accuracyofparis2016systemfornoninvasivediagnosisbladdermalignancy AT hosseiniseyedjalil accuracyofparis2016systemfornoninvasivediagnosisbladdermalignancy AT soleimanimohammad accuracyofparis2016systemfornoninvasivediagnosisbladdermalignancy AT ahadimahsa accuracyofparis2016systemfornoninvasivediagnosisbladdermalignancy AT jamalielena accuracyofparis2016systemfornoninvasivediagnosisbladdermalignancy AT moradiafshin accuracyofparis2016systemfornoninvasivediagnosisbladdermalignancy AT sadeghzadehzahra accuracyofparis2016systemfornoninvasivediagnosisbladdermalignancy AT ghiasisaleh accuracyofparis2016systemfornoninvasivediagnosisbladdermalignancy AT nasirimalihe accuracyofparis2016systemfornoninvasivediagnosisbladdermalignancy AT allamehfarzad accuracyofparis2016systemfornoninvasivediagnosisbladdermalignancy |