Cargando…

Accuracy of Paris 2016 System for Non-invasive Diagnosis Bladder Malignancy

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology (TPS) is a new method for evaluating urinary cytology designed to reduce unreproducible reports. The aim of this study was to reclassify and compare urinary cytology reports with TPS criteria to determine the frequency of un...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rakhshan, Azadeh, Arvin, Esmat, Alahyari, Sam, Kazeminegad, Behrang, Mollasharifi, Tahmineh, Bagheri, Alireza, Aliakbari, Fereshteh, Hosseini, Seyed Jalil, Soleimani, Mohammad, Ahadi, Mahsa, Jamali, Elena, Moradi, Afshin, Sadeghzadeh, Zahra, Ghiasi, Saleh, Nasiri, Malihe, Allameh, Farzad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iranian Society of Pathology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9508540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36247512
http://dx.doi.org/10.30699/IJP.2022.548036.2833
_version_ 1784797041065459712
author Rakhshan, Azadeh
Arvin, Esmat
Alahyari, Sam
Kazeminegad, Behrang
Mollasharifi, Tahmineh
Bagheri, Alireza
Aliakbari, Fereshteh
Hosseini, Seyed Jalil
Soleimani, Mohammad
Ahadi, Mahsa
Jamali, Elena
Moradi, Afshin
Sadeghzadeh, Zahra
Ghiasi, Saleh
Nasiri, Malihe
Allameh, Farzad
author_facet Rakhshan, Azadeh
Arvin, Esmat
Alahyari, Sam
Kazeminegad, Behrang
Mollasharifi, Tahmineh
Bagheri, Alireza
Aliakbari, Fereshteh
Hosseini, Seyed Jalil
Soleimani, Mohammad
Ahadi, Mahsa
Jamali, Elena
Moradi, Afshin
Sadeghzadeh, Zahra
Ghiasi, Saleh
Nasiri, Malihe
Allameh, Farzad
author_sort Rakhshan, Azadeh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology (TPS) is a new method for evaluating urinary cytology designed to reduce unreproducible reports. The aim of this study was to reclassify and compare urinary cytology reports with TPS criteria to determine the frequency of unreproducible reports compared to the previous system. METHODS: In this study, the laboratory electronic registration system analyzed patients' urine samples taken by voided or washing and brushing methods. The cytological evaluation was performed considering the previous system and TPS by a pathologist. The results of the two systems were compared, and the sensitivity and specificity of TPS were calculated. RESULTS: Urine samples were taken from 876 patients. The mean age of patients was 63.36 ± 12.62. Comparing the routine classification system and TPS, it was observed that the number of atypical reports in the TPS system decreased by 12%, and all of these cases were downgraded to the negative group in the new classification. The sensitivity and specificity of TPS were 29.4% and 95.1%, respectively, if suspected malignancy and positive reports for malignancy were considered. Finally, if positive reports for malignancy were selected, sensitivity and specificity changed to 11.8% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although the TPS system has low sensitivity for the diagnosis of urothelial malignancies, due to its high specificity, it is possible to consider and use this classification for screening patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9508540
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Iranian Society of Pathology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95085402022-10-13 Accuracy of Paris 2016 System for Non-invasive Diagnosis Bladder Malignancy Rakhshan, Azadeh Arvin, Esmat Alahyari, Sam Kazeminegad, Behrang Mollasharifi, Tahmineh Bagheri, Alireza Aliakbari, Fereshteh Hosseini, Seyed Jalil Soleimani, Mohammad Ahadi, Mahsa Jamali, Elena Moradi, Afshin Sadeghzadeh, Zahra Ghiasi, Saleh Nasiri, Malihe Allameh, Farzad Iran J Pathol Original Article BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology (TPS) is a new method for evaluating urinary cytology designed to reduce unreproducible reports. The aim of this study was to reclassify and compare urinary cytology reports with TPS criteria to determine the frequency of unreproducible reports compared to the previous system. METHODS: In this study, the laboratory electronic registration system analyzed patients' urine samples taken by voided or washing and brushing methods. The cytological evaluation was performed considering the previous system and TPS by a pathologist. The results of the two systems were compared, and the sensitivity and specificity of TPS were calculated. RESULTS: Urine samples were taken from 876 patients. The mean age of patients was 63.36 ± 12.62. Comparing the routine classification system and TPS, it was observed that the number of atypical reports in the TPS system decreased by 12%, and all of these cases were downgraded to the negative group in the new classification. The sensitivity and specificity of TPS were 29.4% and 95.1%, respectively, if suspected malignancy and positive reports for malignancy were considered. Finally, if positive reports for malignancy were selected, sensitivity and specificity changed to 11.8% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although the TPS system has low sensitivity for the diagnosis of urothelial malignancies, due to its high specificity, it is possible to consider and use this classification for screening patients. Iranian Society of Pathology 2022 2022-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9508540/ /pubmed/36247512 http://dx.doi.org/10.30699/IJP.2022.548036.2833 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution- 4.0 International License which permits Share, copy and redistribution of the material in any medium or format or adapt, remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Rakhshan, Azadeh
Arvin, Esmat
Alahyari, Sam
Kazeminegad, Behrang
Mollasharifi, Tahmineh
Bagheri, Alireza
Aliakbari, Fereshteh
Hosseini, Seyed Jalil
Soleimani, Mohammad
Ahadi, Mahsa
Jamali, Elena
Moradi, Afshin
Sadeghzadeh, Zahra
Ghiasi, Saleh
Nasiri, Malihe
Allameh, Farzad
Accuracy of Paris 2016 System for Non-invasive Diagnosis Bladder Malignancy
title Accuracy of Paris 2016 System for Non-invasive Diagnosis Bladder Malignancy
title_full Accuracy of Paris 2016 System for Non-invasive Diagnosis Bladder Malignancy
title_fullStr Accuracy of Paris 2016 System for Non-invasive Diagnosis Bladder Malignancy
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of Paris 2016 System for Non-invasive Diagnosis Bladder Malignancy
title_short Accuracy of Paris 2016 System for Non-invasive Diagnosis Bladder Malignancy
title_sort accuracy of paris 2016 system for non-invasive diagnosis bladder malignancy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9508540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36247512
http://dx.doi.org/10.30699/IJP.2022.548036.2833
work_keys_str_mv AT rakhshanazadeh accuracyofparis2016systemfornoninvasivediagnosisbladdermalignancy
AT arvinesmat accuracyofparis2016systemfornoninvasivediagnosisbladdermalignancy
AT alahyarisam accuracyofparis2016systemfornoninvasivediagnosisbladdermalignancy
AT kazeminegadbehrang accuracyofparis2016systemfornoninvasivediagnosisbladdermalignancy
AT mollasharifitahmineh accuracyofparis2016systemfornoninvasivediagnosisbladdermalignancy
AT bagherialireza accuracyofparis2016systemfornoninvasivediagnosisbladdermalignancy
AT aliakbarifereshteh accuracyofparis2016systemfornoninvasivediagnosisbladdermalignancy
AT hosseiniseyedjalil accuracyofparis2016systemfornoninvasivediagnosisbladdermalignancy
AT soleimanimohammad accuracyofparis2016systemfornoninvasivediagnosisbladdermalignancy
AT ahadimahsa accuracyofparis2016systemfornoninvasivediagnosisbladdermalignancy
AT jamalielena accuracyofparis2016systemfornoninvasivediagnosisbladdermalignancy
AT moradiafshin accuracyofparis2016systemfornoninvasivediagnosisbladdermalignancy
AT sadeghzadehzahra accuracyofparis2016systemfornoninvasivediagnosisbladdermalignancy
AT ghiasisaleh accuracyofparis2016systemfornoninvasivediagnosisbladdermalignancy
AT nasirimalihe accuracyofparis2016systemfornoninvasivediagnosisbladdermalignancy
AT allamehfarzad accuracyofparis2016systemfornoninvasivediagnosisbladdermalignancy