Cargando…
Surgical research journals - Under review: An assessment of diversity among editorial boards and outcomes of peer review
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic exposed racism as a public health crisis embedded in structural processes. Editors of surgical research journals pledged their commitment to improve structure and process through increasing diversity in the peer review and editorial process; however, little benchmar...
Autores principales: | White, Erin M., Maduka, Richard C., Ballouz, Dena, Chen, Herbert, Wexner, Steven D., Behrns, Kevin E., Lillemoe, Keith D., LeMaire, Scott A., Smink, Douglas S., Sandhu, Gurjit |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9508661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34625204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.09.027 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Reviewing the review: a qualitative assessment of the peer review process in surgical journals
por: Davis, Catherine H., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Gender diversity of editorial boards and gender differences in the peer review process at six journals of ecology and evolution
por: Fox, Charles W., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Times are changing and so is Surgery
por: Behrns, Kevin E., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journals
por: Gasparyan, Armen Yuri, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Editorial Work and the Peer Review Economy of STS
Journals
por: Kaltenbrunner, Wolfgang, et al.
Publicado: (2021)