Cargando…
Double-strand break toxicity is chromatin context independent
Cells respond to double-strand breaks (DSBs) by activating DNA damage response pathways, including cell cycle arrest. We have previously shown that a single double-strand break generated via CRISPR/Cas9 is sufficient to delay cell cycle progression and compromise cell viability. However, we also fou...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9508844/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36107780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac758 |
_version_ | 1784797107398377472 |
---|---|
author | Friskes, Anoek Koob, Lisa Krenning, Lenno Severson, Tesa M Koeleman, Emma S Vergara, Xabier Schubert, Michael van den Berg, Jeroen Evers, Bastiaan Manjón, Anna G Joosten, Stacey Kim, Yongsoo Zwart, Wilbert Medema, René H |
author_facet | Friskes, Anoek Koob, Lisa Krenning, Lenno Severson, Tesa M Koeleman, Emma S Vergara, Xabier Schubert, Michael van den Berg, Jeroen Evers, Bastiaan Manjón, Anna G Joosten, Stacey Kim, Yongsoo Zwart, Wilbert Medema, René H |
author_sort | Friskes, Anoek |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cells respond to double-strand breaks (DSBs) by activating DNA damage response pathways, including cell cycle arrest. We have previously shown that a single double-strand break generated via CRISPR/Cas9 is sufficient to delay cell cycle progression and compromise cell viability. However, we also found that the cellular response to DSBs can vary, independent of the number of lesions. This implies that not all DSBs are equally toxic, and raises the question if the location of a single double-strand break could influence its toxicity. To systematically investigate if DSB-location is a determinant of toxicity we performed a CRISPR/Cas9 screen targeting 6237 single sites in the human genome. Next, we developed a data-driven framework to design CRISPR/Cas9 sgRNA (crRNA) pools targeting specific chromatin features. The chromatin context was defined using ChromHMM states, Lamin-B1 DAM-iD, DNAseI hypersensitivity, and RNA-sequencing data. We computationally designed 6 distinct crRNA pools, each containing 10 crRNAs targeting the same chromatin state. We show that the toxicity of a DSB is highly similar across the different ChromHMM states. Rather, we find that the major determinants of toxicity of a sgRNA are cutting efficiency and off-target effects. Thus, chromatin features have little to no effect on the toxicity of a single CRISPR/Cas9-induced DSB. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9508844 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95088442022-09-26 Double-strand break toxicity is chromatin context independent Friskes, Anoek Koob, Lisa Krenning, Lenno Severson, Tesa M Koeleman, Emma S Vergara, Xabier Schubert, Michael van den Berg, Jeroen Evers, Bastiaan Manjón, Anna G Joosten, Stacey Kim, Yongsoo Zwart, Wilbert Medema, René H Nucleic Acids Res Genome Integrity, Repair and Replication Cells respond to double-strand breaks (DSBs) by activating DNA damage response pathways, including cell cycle arrest. We have previously shown that a single double-strand break generated via CRISPR/Cas9 is sufficient to delay cell cycle progression and compromise cell viability. However, we also found that the cellular response to DSBs can vary, independent of the number of lesions. This implies that not all DSBs are equally toxic, and raises the question if the location of a single double-strand break could influence its toxicity. To systematically investigate if DSB-location is a determinant of toxicity we performed a CRISPR/Cas9 screen targeting 6237 single sites in the human genome. Next, we developed a data-driven framework to design CRISPR/Cas9 sgRNA (crRNA) pools targeting specific chromatin features. The chromatin context was defined using ChromHMM states, Lamin-B1 DAM-iD, DNAseI hypersensitivity, and RNA-sequencing data. We computationally designed 6 distinct crRNA pools, each containing 10 crRNAs targeting the same chromatin state. We show that the toxicity of a DSB is highly similar across the different ChromHMM states. Rather, we find that the major determinants of toxicity of a sgRNA are cutting efficiency and off-target effects. Thus, chromatin features have little to no effect on the toxicity of a single CRISPR/Cas9-induced DSB. Oxford University Press 2022-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9508844/ /pubmed/36107780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac758 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Genome Integrity, Repair and Replication Friskes, Anoek Koob, Lisa Krenning, Lenno Severson, Tesa M Koeleman, Emma S Vergara, Xabier Schubert, Michael van den Berg, Jeroen Evers, Bastiaan Manjón, Anna G Joosten, Stacey Kim, Yongsoo Zwart, Wilbert Medema, René H Double-strand break toxicity is chromatin context independent |
title | Double-strand break toxicity is chromatin context independent |
title_full | Double-strand break toxicity is chromatin context independent |
title_fullStr | Double-strand break toxicity is chromatin context independent |
title_full_unstemmed | Double-strand break toxicity is chromatin context independent |
title_short | Double-strand break toxicity is chromatin context independent |
title_sort | double-strand break toxicity is chromatin context independent |
topic | Genome Integrity, Repair and Replication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9508844/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36107780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac758 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT friskesanoek doublestrandbreaktoxicityischromatincontextindependent AT kooblisa doublestrandbreaktoxicityischromatincontextindependent AT krenninglenno doublestrandbreaktoxicityischromatincontextindependent AT seversontesam doublestrandbreaktoxicityischromatincontextindependent AT koelemanemmas doublestrandbreaktoxicityischromatincontextindependent AT vergaraxabier doublestrandbreaktoxicityischromatincontextindependent AT schubertmichael doublestrandbreaktoxicityischromatincontextindependent AT vandenbergjeroen doublestrandbreaktoxicityischromatincontextindependent AT eversbastiaan doublestrandbreaktoxicityischromatincontextindependent AT manjonannag doublestrandbreaktoxicityischromatincontextindependent AT joostenstacey doublestrandbreaktoxicityischromatincontextindependent AT kimyongsoo doublestrandbreaktoxicityischromatincontextindependent AT zwartwilbert doublestrandbreaktoxicityischromatincontextindependent AT medemareneh doublestrandbreaktoxicityischromatincontextindependent |