Cargando…

Evaluation efficacy and safety of epidural analgesia in second-trimester induced labor: A single-center, prospective, non-randomized, controlled study

Second-trimester induced labor in pregnant women was often more likely to suffer from psychological and physiological double pain. However, the analgesic management received less attention, and the optimal analgesic mode for second-trimester induced labor had not been determined. Our objective was t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zeng, Yong, Jiang, Tao, Zheng, Ya-Hong, He, Wen-Rong, Wang, Xiao-Wen, Wei, Hua, Wang, Li, Liu, Zu-Rong, Zhang, Xu-Feng, Yi, Cunjian, Chen, Ke-Ming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9509083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36197253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000030767
_version_ 1784797157048451072
author Zeng, Yong
Jiang, Tao
Zheng, Ya-Hong
He, Wen-Rong
Wang, Xiao-Wen
Wei, Hua
Wang, Li
Liu, Zu-Rong
Zhang, Xu-Feng
Yi, Cunjian
Chen, Ke-Ming
author_facet Zeng, Yong
Jiang, Tao
Zheng, Ya-Hong
He, Wen-Rong
Wang, Xiao-Wen
Wei, Hua
Wang, Li
Liu, Zu-Rong
Zhang, Xu-Feng
Yi, Cunjian
Chen, Ke-Ming
author_sort Zeng, Yong
collection PubMed
description Second-trimester induced labor in pregnant women was often more likely to suffer from psychological and physiological double pain. However, the analgesic management received less attention, and the optimal analgesic mode for second-trimester induced labor had not been determined. Our objective was to evaluate the feasible of epidural analgesia (EA) in second-trimester induced labor. METHODS: From January 2020 to December 2021, Primipara who planned to undergo second-trimester induced labor in the First Affiliated Hospital of Yangtze University were collected. The method of labor induction was oral mifepristone + amniotic cavity injection of Ethacridine Lactate. Based on whether or not patients received epidural analgesia, which were divided into EA group (30 cases) and non-EA (NEA) group (30 cases). The primary outcome were visual analog scale (VAS) score of pain and result of follow-up, the secondary outcomes included relative clinical parameter and labor duration. RESULTS: Vaginal induction of labor was successful in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference in VAS of pain between the two groups before analgesia (P > .05), but the VAS of pain in the EA group was significantly lower than the NEA group (P < .05) after analgesia or at delivery. The following outcomes showed no statistical difference between two groups: labor duration, postpartum hemorrhage, hemorrhage ≥ 500 mL, intrapartum injury, second days hemoglobin, C-reactive protein, antibiotic therapy days, hospitalizations days, and placenta residue (P > .05). The median hospitalization costs of EA group was 4697.5 yuan, and NEA group was 3673 yuan, the difference was statistically significant (P < .001). No adverse events related to EA occurred during hospitalization, only 3 patients showed mild lumbago and back pain after follow-up to three months postpartum, which was significantly relieved after proper rest. CONCLUSION: EA can significantly reduce the pain of parturients, which may be effective and safe in the second-trimester induced labor.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9509083
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95090832022-09-26 Evaluation efficacy and safety of epidural analgesia in second-trimester induced labor: A single-center, prospective, non-randomized, controlled study Zeng, Yong Jiang, Tao Zheng, Ya-Hong He, Wen-Rong Wang, Xiao-Wen Wei, Hua Wang, Li Liu, Zu-Rong Zhang, Xu-Feng Yi, Cunjian Chen, Ke-Ming Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article Second-trimester induced labor in pregnant women was often more likely to suffer from psychological and physiological double pain. However, the analgesic management received less attention, and the optimal analgesic mode for second-trimester induced labor had not been determined. Our objective was to evaluate the feasible of epidural analgesia (EA) in second-trimester induced labor. METHODS: From January 2020 to December 2021, Primipara who planned to undergo second-trimester induced labor in the First Affiliated Hospital of Yangtze University were collected. The method of labor induction was oral mifepristone + amniotic cavity injection of Ethacridine Lactate. Based on whether or not patients received epidural analgesia, which were divided into EA group (30 cases) and non-EA (NEA) group (30 cases). The primary outcome were visual analog scale (VAS) score of pain and result of follow-up, the secondary outcomes included relative clinical parameter and labor duration. RESULTS: Vaginal induction of labor was successful in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference in VAS of pain between the two groups before analgesia (P > .05), but the VAS of pain in the EA group was significantly lower than the NEA group (P < .05) after analgesia or at delivery. The following outcomes showed no statistical difference between two groups: labor duration, postpartum hemorrhage, hemorrhage ≥ 500 mL, intrapartum injury, second days hemoglobin, C-reactive protein, antibiotic therapy days, hospitalizations days, and placenta residue (P > .05). The median hospitalization costs of EA group was 4697.5 yuan, and NEA group was 3673 yuan, the difference was statistically significant (P < .001). No adverse events related to EA occurred during hospitalization, only 3 patients showed mild lumbago and back pain after follow-up to three months postpartum, which was significantly relieved after proper rest. CONCLUSION: EA can significantly reduce the pain of parturients, which may be effective and safe in the second-trimester induced labor. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9509083/ /pubmed/36197253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000030767 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zeng, Yong
Jiang, Tao
Zheng, Ya-Hong
He, Wen-Rong
Wang, Xiao-Wen
Wei, Hua
Wang, Li
Liu, Zu-Rong
Zhang, Xu-Feng
Yi, Cunjian
Chen, Ke-Ming
Evaluation efficacy and safety of epidural analgesia in second-trimester induced labor: A single-center, prospective, non-randomized, controlled study
title Evaluation efficacy and safety of epidural analgesia in second-trimester induced labor: A single-center, prospective, non-randomized, controlled study
title_full Evaluation efficacy and safety of epidural analgesia in second-trimester induced labor: A single-center, prospective, non-randomized, controlled study
title_fullStr Evaluation efficacy and safety of epidural analgesia in second-trimester induced labor: A single-center, prospective, non-randomized, controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation efficacy and safety of epidural analgesia in second-trimester induced labor: A single-center, prospective, non-randomized, controlled study
title_short Evaluation efficacy and safety of epidural analgesia in second-trimester induced labor: A single-center, prospective, non-randomized, controlled study
title_sort evaluation efficacy and safety of epidural analgesia in second-trimester induced labor: a single-center, prospective, non-randomized, controlled study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9509083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36197253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000030767
work_keys_str_mv AT zengyong evaluationefficacyandsafetyofepiduralanalgesiainsecondtrimesterinducedlaborasinglecenterprospectivenonrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT jiangtao evaluationefficacyandsafetyofepiduralanalgesiainsecondtrimesterinducedlaborasinglecenterprospectivenonrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT zhengyahong evaluationefficacyandsafetyofepiduralanalgesiainsecondtrimesterinducedlaborasinglecenterprospectivenonrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT hewenrong evaluationefficacyandsafetyofepiduralanalgesiainsecondtrimesterinducedlaborasinglecenterprospectivenonrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT wangxiaowen evaluationefficacyandsafetyofepiduralanalgesiainsecondtrimesterinducedlaborasinglecenterprospectivenonrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT weihua evaluationefficacyandsafetyofepiduralanalgesiainsecondtrimesterinducedlaborasinglecenterprospectivenonrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT wangli evaluationefficacyandsafetyofepiduralanalgesiainsecondtrimesterinducedlaborasinglecenterprospectivenonrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT liuzurong evaluationefficacyandsafetyofepiduralanalgesiainsecondtrimesterinducedlaborasinglecenterprospectivenonrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT zhangxufeng evaluationefficacyandsafetyofepiduralanalgesiainsecondtrimesterinducedlaborasinglecenterprospectivenonrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT yicunjian evaluationefficacyandsafetyofepiduralanalgesiainsecondtrimesterinducedlaborasinglecenterprospectivenonrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT chenkeming evaluationefficacyandsafetyofepiduralanalgesiainsecondtrimesterinducedlaborasinglecenterprospectivenonrandomizedcontrolledstudy