Cargando…

The Hybrid Facelift

In facelift surgery, many surgeons tend to choose one superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) technique over another. SMAS plication augments tissue using folding, which is very useful in deflated faces. In heavy faces, SMAS-ectomy and, to an arguably further extent, full SMAS undermining and e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Althubaiti, Ghazi A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9509156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36168608
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004503
_version_ 1784797173063352320
author Althubaiti, Ghazi A.
author_facet Althubaiti, Ghazi A.
author_sort Althubaiti, Ghazi A.
collection PubMed
description In facelift surgery, many surgeons tend to choose one superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) technique over another. SMAS plication augments tissue using folding, which is very useful in deflated faces. In heavy faces, SMAS-ectomy and, to an arguably further extent, full SMAS undermining and excision can reduce volume and avoid the excessive fullness that may follow plication. Not all patients present with uniform deflation or uniform fullness of the face. Some will present with a mixed picture, fullness in one area such as the cheek with deflation in another (eg, over the angle of the mandible). In those patients, plication alone may lead to undesired fullness, typically overaugmenting cheeks or angle of the mandible. SMAS elevation and excision may avoid overaugmentation (arguably better than simple SMAS-ectomy), but it is technically more demanding and consumes longer operative time. An alternative approach is suggested in this article. For those patients with “mixed” pictures, we suggest a hybrid of existing SMAS techniques, in which for each side of the face, the face is divided into upper (cheek) and lower (jawline and neck) areas. Deflated areas are addressed with plication. Full areas are addressed with SMAS undermining and excision. Although this kind of surgical approach might be practiced by some surgeons, it has not been described well in the literature. In a series of 495 facelifts, the author found this “hybrid facelift” technique useful in 61 cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9509156
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95091562022-09-26 The Hybrid Facelift Althubaiti, Ghazi A. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Cosmetic In facelift surgery, many surgeons tend to choose one superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) technique over another. SMAS plication augments tissue using folding, which is very useful in deflated faces. In heavy faces, SMAS-ectomy and, to an arguably further extent, full SMAS undermining and excision can reduce volume and avoid the excessive fullness that may follow plication. Not all patients present with uniform deflation or uniform fullness of the face. Some will present with a mixed picture, fullness in one area such as the cheek with deflation in another (eg, over the angle of the mandible). In those patients, plication alone may lead to undesired fullness, typically overaugmenting cheeks or angle of the mandible. SMAS elevation and excision may avoid overaugmentation (arguably better than simple SMAS-ectomy), but it is technically more demanding and consumes longer operative time. An alternative approach is suggested in this article. For those patients with “mixed” pictures, we suggest a hybrid of existing SMAS techniques, in which for each side of the face, the face is divided into upper (cheek) and lower (jawline and neck) areas. Deflated areas are addressed with plication. Full areas are addressed with SMAS undermining and excision. Although this kind of surgical approach might be practiced by some surgeons, it has not been described well in the literature. In a series of 495 facelifts, the author found this “hybrid facelift” technique useful in 61 cases. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9509156/ /pubmed/36168608 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004503 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Cosmetic
Althubaiti, Ghazi A.
The Hybrid Facelift
title The Hybrid Facelift
title_full The Hybrid Facelift
title_fullStr The Hybrid Facelift
title_full_unstemmed The Hybrid Facelift
title_short The Hybrid Facelift
title_sort hybrid facelift
topic Cosmetic
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9509156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36168608
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004503
work_keys_str_mv AT althubaitighazia thehybridfacelift
AT althubaitighazia hybridfacelift