Cargando…
The Hybrid Facelift
In facelift surgery, many surgeons tend to choose one superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) technique over another. SMAS plication augments tissue using folding, which is very useful in deflated faces. In heavy faces, SMAS-ectomy and, to an arguably further extent, full SMAS undermining and e...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9509156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36168608 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004503 |
_version_ | 1784797173063352320 |
---|---|
author | Althubaiti, Ghazi A. |
author_facet | Althubaiti, Ghazi A. |
author_sort | Althubaiti, Ghazi A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In facelift surgery, many surgeons tend to choose one superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) technique over another. SMAS plication augments tissue using folding, which is very useful in deflated faces. In heavy faces, SMAS-ectomy and, to an arguably further extent, full SMAS undermining and excision can reduce volume and avoid the excessive fullness that may follow plication. Not all patients present with uniform deflation or uniform fullness of the face. Some will present with a mixed picture, fullness in one area such as the cheek with deflation in another (eg, over the angle of the mandible). In those patients, plication alone may lead to undesired fullness, typically overaugmenting cheeks or angle of the mandible. SMAS elevation and excision may avoid overaugmentation (arguably better than simple SMAS-ectomy), but it is technically more demanding and consumes longer operative time. An alternative approach is suggested in this article. For those patients with “mixed” pictures, we suggest a hybrid of existing SMAS techniques, in which for each side of the face, the face is divided into upper (cheek) and lower (jawline and neck) areas. Deflated areas are addressed with plication. Full areas are addressed with SMAS undermining and excision. Although this kind of surgical approach might be practiced by some surgeons, it has not been described well in the literature. In a series of 495 facelifts, the author found this “hybrid facelift” technique useful in 61 cases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9509156 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95091562022-09-26 The Hybrid Facelift Althubaiti, Ghazi A. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Cosmetic In facelift surgery, many surgeons tend to choose one superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) technique over another. SMAS plication augments tissue using folding, which is very useful in deflated faces. In heavy faces, SMAS-ectomy and, to an arguably further extent, full SMAS undermining and excision can reduce volume and avoid the excessive fullness that may follow plication. Not all patients present with uniform deflation or uniform fullness of the face. Some will present with a mixed picture, fullness in one area such as the cheek with deflation in another (eg, over the angle of the mandible). In those patients, plication alone may lead to undesired fullness, typically overaugmenting cheeks or angle of the mandible. SMAS elevation and excision may avoid overaugmentation (arguably better than simple SMAS-ectomy), but it is technically more demanding and consumes longer operative time. An alternative approach is suggested in this article. For those patients with “mixed” pictures, we suggest a hybrid of existing SMAS techniques, in which for each side of the face, the face is divided into upper (cheek) and lower (jawline and neck) areas. Deflated areas are addressed with plication. Full areas are addressed with SMAS undermining and excision. Although this kind of surgical approach might be practiced by some surgeons, it has not been described well in the literature. In a series of 495 facelifts, the author found this “hybrid facelift” technique useful in 61 cases. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9509156/ /pubmed/36168608 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004503 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Cosmetic Althubaiti, Ghazi A. The Hybrid Facelift |
title | The Hybrid Facelift |
title_full | The Hybrid Facelift |
title_fullStr | The Hybrid Facelift |
title_full_unstemmed | The Hybrid Facelift |
title_short | The Hybrid Facelift |
title_sort | hybrid facelift |
topic | Cosmetic |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9509156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36168608 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004503 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT althubaitighazia thehybridfacelift AT althubaitighazia hybridfacelift |