Cargando…

Assessment of COVID-19 related preventive measures in medical students across a lower-middle-income country: A cross-sectional study from Pakistan

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to identify the effect of having COVID-19 positive close contact on practices and evaluate practices regarding COVID-19 prevention among medical students and the differences among clinical and preclinical students. STUDY DESIGN: The cross-sectional study included medical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmad, Shoaib, Hassan, Sheza, Farooq, Umar, Ahmad, Shkaib, Ehsan, Sumera, Ali, Daniyal Mansoor, Essar, Mohammad Yasir, Khan, Hamza Farooq, Hashim, Hashim Talib
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9509292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36186491
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104757
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: This study aims to identify the effect of having COVID-19 positive close contact on practices and evaluate practices regarding COVID-19 prevention among medical students and the differences among clinical and preclinical students. STUDY DESIGN: The cross-sectional study included medical students from the Micro-fest++ event held on 30th May 2020. METHODS: Participants filled a questionnaire of 15 questions regarding COVID preventive measures practices having satisfactory reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.715) and validity. The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (IBM SPSS) 26.0 was used for data analysis. Out of 1342 medical students, the majority were female (N = 881, 65.6%). Greater proportion (47%) of students had good practices (>85.7%) (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Having COVID-19 positive relatives resulted in higher positive responses for practices with 11.86 ± 1.94 (out of 14) compared to 11.78 ± 2.38 for the COVID-19 negative group. Clinical year students compared to preclinical students responded positively to all questions, except one, and had a better score of 11.90 ± 2.28 (out of 14) compared to 11.61 ± 2.37 (p < 0.05). A significant difference was noted for “Information on preventive measures” (p < 0.01), “Avoiding crowds and staying home” (p < 0.05), “Social distancing (maintain 3 feet)" (p < 0.01), and “Practices of disinfection after going outside” (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, medical students showed good practices, but a lack of knowledge in certain areas requires addressing infection during clinical rotations. A greater proportion of clinical students and those having a COVID-19 positive relative showed better adherence to practices.