Cargando…

Antifouling coatings can reduce algal growth while preserving coral settlement

In the early stages after larval settlement, coral spat can be rapidly overgrown and outcompeted by algae, reducing overall survival for coral reef replenishment and supply for restoration programs. Here we investigated three antifouling (AF) coatings for their ability to inhibit algal fouling on co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roepke, Lisa K., Brefeld, David, Soltmann, Ulrich, Randall, Carly J., Negri, Andrew P., Kunzmann, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9509345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36153418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19997-6
_version_ 1784797219521560576
author Roepke, Lisa K.
Brefeld, David
Soltmann, Ulrich
Randall, Carly J.
Negri, Andrew P.
Kunzmann, Andreas
author_facet Roepke, Lisa K.
Brefeld, David
Soltmann, Ulrich
Randall, Carly J.
Negri, Andrew P.
Kunzmann, Andreas
author_sort Roepke, Lisa K.
collection PubMed
description In the early stages after larval settlement, coral spat can be rapidly overgrown and outcompeted by algae, reducing overall survival for coral reef replenishment and supply for restoration programs. Here we investigated three antifouling (AF) coatings for their ability to inhibit algal fouling on coral settlement plugs, a commonly-used restoration substrate. Plugs were either fully or partially coated with the AF coatings and incubated in mesocosm systems with partial recirculation for 37 days to track fouling succession. In addition, settlement of Acropora tenuis larvae was measured to determine whether AF coatings were a settlement deterrent. Uncoated control plugs became heavily fouled, yielding only 4–8% bare substrate on upper surfaces after 37 days. During this period, an encapsulated dichlorooctylisothiazolinone (DCOIT)-coating was most effective in reducing fouling, yielding 61–63% bare substrate. Antiadhesive and cerium dioxide (CeO(2−x)) nanoparticle (NP) coatings were less effective, yielding 11–17% and 2% bare substrate, respectively. Average settlement of A. tenuis larvae on the three types of AF-coated plugs did not statistically differ from settlement on uncoated controls. However, settlement on the NP-coating was generally the highest and was significantly higher than settlement found on the antiadhesive- and DCOIT-coating. Furthermore, on plugs only partially-covered with AF coatings, larval settlement on coated NP- areas was significantly higher than settlement on coated antiadhesive- and DCOIT-areas. These results demonstrate that AF coatings can reduce fouling intensity on biologically-relevant timescales while preserving robust levels of coral settlement. This represents an important step towards reducing fine-scale competition with benthic fouling organisms in coral breeding and propagation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9509345
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95093452022-09-26 Antifouling coatings can reduce algal growth while preserving coral settlement Roepke, Lisa K. Brefeld, David Soltmann, Ulrich Randall, Carly J. Negri, Andrew P. Kunzmann, Andreas Sci Rep Article In the early stages after larval settlement, coral spat can be rapidly overgrown and outcompeted by algae, reducing overall survival for coral reef replenishment and supply for restoration programs. Here we investigated three antifouling (AF) coatings for their ability to inhibit algal fouling on coral settlement plugs, a commonly-used restoration substrate. Plugs were either fully or partially coated with the AF coatings and incubated in mesocosm systems with partial recirculation for 37 days to track fouling succession. In addition, settlement of Acropora tenuis larvae was measured to determine whether AF coatings were a settlement deterrent. Uncoated control plugs became heavily fouled, yielding only 4–8% bare substrate on upper surfaces after 37 days. During this period, an encapsulated dichlorooctylisothiazolinone (DCOIT)-coating was most effective in reducing fouling, yielding 61–63% bare substrate. Antiadhesive and cerium dioxide (CeO(2−x)) nanoparticle (NP) coatings were less effective, yielding 11–17% and 2% bare substrate, respectively. Average settlement of A. tenuis larvae on the three types of AF-coated plugs did not statistically differ from settlement on uncoated controls. However, settlement on the NP-coating was generally the highest and was significantly higher than settlement found on the antiadhesive- and DCOIT-coating. Furthermore, on plugs only partially-covered with AF coatings, larval settlement on coated NP- areas was significantly higher than settlement on coated antiadhesive- and DCOIT-areas. These results demonstrate that AF coatings can reduce fouling intensity on biologically-relevant timescales while preserving robust levels of coral settlement. This represents an important step towards reducing fine-scale competition with benthic fouling organisms in coral breeding and propagation. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9509345/ /pubmed/36153418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19997-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Roepke, Lisa K.
Brefeld, David
Soltmann, Ulrich
Randall, Carly J.
Negri, Andrew P.
Kunzmann, Andreas
Antifouling coatings can reduce algal growth while preserving coral settlement
title Antifouling coatings can reduce algal growth while preserving coral settlement
title_full Antifouling coatings can reduce algal growth while preserving coral settlement
title_fullStr Antifouling coatings can reduce algal growth while preserving coral settlement
title_full_unstemmed Antifouling coatings can reduce algal growth while preserving coral settlement
title_short Antifouling coatings can reduce algal growth while preserving coral settlement
title_sort antifouling coatings can reduce algal growth while preserving coral settlement
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9509345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36153418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19997-6
work_keys_str_mv AT roepkelisak antifoulingcoatingscanreducealgalgrowthwhilepreservingcoralsettlement
AT brefelddavid antifoulingcoatingscanreducealgalgrowthwhilepreservingcoralsettlement
AT soltmannulrich antifoulingcoatingscanreducealgalgrowthwhilepreservingcoralsettlement
AT randallcarlyj antifoulingcoatingscanreducealgalgrowthwhilepreservingcoralsettlement
AT negriandrewp antifoulingcoatingscanreducealgalgrowthwhilepreservingcoralsettlement
AT kunzmannandreas antifoulingcoatingscanreducealgalgrowthwhilepreservingcoralsettlement