Cargando…
Renal imaging at 5 T versus 3 T: a comparison study
BACKGROUND: Recently, a whole-body 5 T MRI scanner was developed to open the door of abdominal imaging at high-field strength. This prospective study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of renal imaging at 5 T and compare the image quality, potential artifacts, and contrast ratios with 3 T. METHODS: F...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Vienna
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9509503/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36153471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01290-9 |
_version_ | 1784797237320089600 |
---|---|
author | Zheng, Liyun Yang, Chun Sheng, Ruofan Dai, Yongming Zeng, Mengsu |
author_facet | Zheng, Liyun Yang, Chun Sheng, Ruofan Dai, Yongming Zeng, Mengsu |
author_sort | Zheng, Liyun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recently, a whole-body 5 T MRI scanner was developed to open the door of abdominal imaging at high-field strength. This prospective study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of renal imaging at 5 T and compare the image quality, potential artifacts, and contrast ratios with 3 T. METHODS: Forty healthy volunteers underwent MRI examination both at 3 T and 5 T. MRI sequences included T1-weighted gradient-echo (GRE), T2-weighted fast spin echo, diffusion-weighted imaging, and multi-echo GRE T2* mapping. Image quality and presence of artifacts were assessed for all sequences using four-point scales. For anatomical imaging, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast ratio (CR) of abdomen organ tissues were calculated. Besides, for functional imaging, the contrast-to-noise ratio of cortex/medulla was calculated. Wilcoxon signed rank-sum test was used to compare the visual evaluation scores and quantitative measurements between 3 and 5 T images. RESULTS: Compared to 3 T examination, T1-weighted sequence at 5 T showed significantly better image quality with higher conspicuity of the renal veins and arteries, and comparable artifacts. Image quality was comparable between both field strengths on T2-weighted images, whereas a significantly higher level of artifacts was observed at 5 T. Besides, 5 T MRI contributed to higher SNR and CR for abdomen organ tissues. For functional imaging, 5 T MRI showed improved corticomedullar discrimination. There was no significant difference between apparent diffusion coefficient of renal at 3 T and 5 T, while 5 T MRI resulted in significantly shorter T2* values in both cortex and medulla. CONCLUSIONS: 5 T MRI provides anatomical and functional images of the kidney with sufficient image quality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9509503 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Vienna |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95095032022-10-20 Renal imaging at 5 T versus 3 T: a comparison study Zheng, Liyun Yang, Chun Sheng, Ruofan Dai, Yongming Zeng, Mengsu Insights Imaging Original Article BACKGROUND: Recently, a whole-body 5 T MRI scanner was developed to open the door of abdominal imaging at high-field strength. This prospective study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of renal imaging at 5 T and compare the image quality, potential artifacts, and contrast ratios with 3 T. METHODS: Forty healthy volunteers underwent MRI examination both at 3 T and 5 T. MRI sequences included T1-weighted gradient-echo (GRE), T2-weighted fast spin echo, diffusion-weighted imaging, and multi-echo GRE T2* mapping. Image quality and presence of artifacts were assessed for all sequences using four-point scales. For anatomical imaging, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast ratio (CR) of abdomen organ tissues were calculated. Besides, for functional imaging, the contrast-to-noise ratio of cortex/medulla was calculated. Wilcoxon signed rank-sum test was used to compare the visual evaluation scores and quantitative measurements between 3 and 5 T images. RESULTS: Compared to 3 T examination, T1-weighted sequence at 5 T showed significantly better image quality with higher conspicuity of the renal veins and arteries, and comparable artifacts. Image quality was comparable between both field strengths on T2-weighted images, whereas a significantly higher level of artifacts was observed at 5 T. Besides, 5 T MRI contributed to higher SNR and CR for abdomen organ tissues. For functional imaging, 5 T MRI showed improved corticomedullar discrimination. There was no significant difference between apparent diffusion coefficient of renal at 3 T and 5 T, while 5 T MRI resulted in significantly shorter T2* values in both cortex and medulla. CONCLUSIONS: 5 T MRI provides anatomical and functional images of the kidney with sufficient image quality. Springer Vienna 2022-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9509503/ /pubmed/36153471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01290-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Zheng, Liyun Yang, Chun Sheng, Ruofan Dai, Yongming Zeng, Mengsu Renal imaging at 5 T versus 3 T: a comparison study |
title | Renal imaging at 5 T versus 3 T: a comparison study |
title_full | Renal imaging at 5 T versus 3 T: a comparison study |
title_fullStr | Renal imaging at 5 T versus 3 T: a comparison study |
title_full_unstemmed | Renal imaging at 5 T versus 3 T: a comparison study |
title_short | Renal imaging at 5 T versus 3 T: a comparison study |
title_sort | renal imaging at 5 t versus 3 t: a comparison study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9509503/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36153471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01290-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhengliyun renalimagingat5tversus3tacomparisonstudy AT yangchun renalimagingat5tversus3tacomparisonstudy AT shengruofan renalimagingat5tversus3tacomparisonstudy AT daiyongming renalimagingat5tversus3tacomparisonstudy AT zengmengsu renalimagingat5tversus3tacomparisonstudy |