Cargando…

Renal imaging at 5 T versus 3 T: a comparison study

BACKGROUND: Recently, a whole-body 5 T MRI scanner was developed to open the door of abdominal imaging at high-field strength. This prospective study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of renal imaging at 5 T and compare the image quality, potential artifacts, and contrast ratios with 3 T. METHODS: F...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Liyun, Yang, Chun, Sheng, Ruofan, Dai, Yongming, Zeng, Mengsu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9509503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36153471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01290-9
_version_ 1784797237320089600
author Zheng, Liyun
Yang, Chun
Sheng, Ruofan
Dai, Yongming
Zeng, Mengsu
author_facet Zheng, Liyun
Yang, Chun
Sheng, Ruofan
Dai, Yongming
Zeng, Mengsu
author_sort Zheng, Liyun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recently, a whole-body 5 T MRI scanner was developed to open the door of abdominal imaging at high-field strength. This prospective study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of renal imaging at 5 T and compare the image quality, potential artifacts, and contrast ratios with 3 T. METHODS: Forty healthy volunteers underwent MRI examination both at 3 T and 5 T. MRI sequences included T1-weighted gradient-echo (GRE), T2-weighted fast spin echo, diffusion-weighted imaging, and multi-echo GRE T2* mapping. Image quality and presence of artifacts were assessed for all sequences using four-point scales. For anatomical imaging, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast ratio (CR) of abdomen organ tissues were calculated. Besides, for functional imaging, the contrast-to-noise ratio of cortex/medulla was calculated. Wilcoxon signed rank-sum test was used to compare the visual evaluation scores and quantitative measurements between 3 and 5 T images. RESULTS: Compared to 3 T examination, T1-weighted sequence at 5 T showed significantly better image quality with higher conspicuity of the renal veins and arteries, and comparable artifacts. Image quality was comparable between both field strengths on T2-weighted images, whereas a significantly higher level of artifacts was observed at 5 T. Besides, 5 T MRI contributed to higher SNR and CR for abdomen organ tissues. For functional imaging, 5 T MRI showed improved corticomedullar discrimination. There was no significant difference between apparent diffusion coefficient of renal at 3 T and 5 T, while 5 T MRI resulted in significantly shorter T2* values in both cortex and medulla. CONCLUSIONS: 5 T MRI provides anatomical and functional images of the kidney with sufficient image quality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9509503
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95095032022-10-20 Renal imaging at 5 T versus 3 T: a comparison study Zheng, Liyun Yang, Chun Sheng, Ruofan Dai, Yongming Zeng, Mengsu Insights Imaging Original Article BACKGROUND: Recently, a whole-body 5 T MRI scanner was developed to open the door of abdominal imaging at high-field strength. This prospective study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of renal imaging at 5 T and compare the image quality, potential artifacts, and contrast ratios with 3 T. METHODS: Forty healthy volunteers underwent MRI examination both at 3 T and 5 T. MRI sequences included T1-weighted gradient-echo (GRE), T2-weighted fast spin echo, diffusion-weighted imaging, and multi-echo GRE T2* mapping. Image quality and presence of artifacts were assessed for all sequences using four-point scales. For anatomical imaging, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast ratio (CR) of abdomen organ tissues were calculated. Besides, for functional imaging, the contrast-to-noise ratio of cortex/medulla was calculated. Wilcoxon signed rank-sum test was used to compare the visual evaluation scores and quantitative measurements between 3 and 5 T images. RESULTS: Compared to 3 T examination, T1-weighted sequence at 5 T showed significantly better image quality with higher conspicuity of the renal veins and arteries, and comparable artifacts. Image quality was comparable between both field strengths on T2-weighted images, whereas a significantly higher level of artifacts was observed at 5 T. Besides, 5 T MRI contributed to higher SNR and CR for abdomen organ tissues. For functional imaging, 5 T MRI showed improved corticomedullar discrimination. There was no significant difference between apparent diffusion coefficient of renal at 3 T and 5 T, while 5 T MRI resulted in significantly shorter T2* values in both cortex and medulla. CONCLUSIONS: 5 T MRI provides anatomical and functional images of the kidney with sufficient image quality. Springer Vienna 2022-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9509503/ /pubmed/36153471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01290-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Zheng, Liyun
Yang, Chun
Sheng, Ruofan
Dai, Yongming
Zeng, Mengsu
Renal imaging at 5 T versus 3 T: a comparison study
title Renal imaging at 5 T versus 3 T: a comparison study
title_full Renal imaging at 5 T versus 3 T: a comparison study
title_fullStr Renal imaging at 5 T versus 3 T: a comparison study
title_full_unstemmed Renal imaging at 5 T versus 3 T: a comparison study
title_short Renal imaging at 5 T versus 3 T: a comparison study
title_sort renal imaging at 5 t versus 3 t: a comparison study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9509503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36153471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01290-9
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengliyun renalimagingat5tversus3tacomparisonstudy
AT yangchun renalimagingat5tversus3tacomparisonstudy
AT shengruofan renalimagingat5tversus3tacomparisonstudy
AT daiyongming renalimagingat5tversus3tacomparisonstudy
AT zengmengsu renalimagingat5tversus3tacomparisonstudy