Cargando…

Faster Insulin Aspart for Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion: Is It Worth It?

Introduction Faster insulin aspart (fASP) is the new formulation of insulin aspart (ASP) with a left-shifted pharmacokinetic profile, allowing better control of early postprandial hyperglycemia and a reduction in the risk of late post-meal hypoglycemia. However, it can be associated with more freque...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rosinha, Patrícia, Teixeira, Sofia, Vilaverde, Joana, Cardoso, Maria Helena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9509526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36176818
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.28422
_version_ 1784797242827210752
author Rosinha, Patrícia
Teixeira, Sofia
Vilaverde, Joana
Cardoso, Maria Helena
author_facet Rosinha, Patrícia
Teixeira, Sofia
Vilaverde, Joana
Cardoso, Maria Helena
author_sort Rosinha, Patrícia
collection PubMed
description Introduction Faster insulin aspart (fASP) is the new formulation of insulin aspart (ASP) with a left-shifted pharmacokinetic profile, allowing better control of early postprandial hyperglycemia and a reduction in the risk of late post-meal hypoglycemia. However, it can be associated with more frequent infusion set changes. The purpose of this study is to evaluate efficacy and safety one, three, and six months after starting fASP in continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) systems. Methods This is a retrospective study that included adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus, users of CSII ≥3 months, who started fASP. Exclusion criteria included less than one month of follow-up after the intervention, concomitant initiation of pharmacological therapy, pre-conception period, and non-use of continuous glucose monitoring. Results A total of 77 individuals were included, of which 52 (67.5%) were female, aged 39.87 ± 13.10 years, with a mean time under CSII of 7.30 ± 3.58 years and a median follow-up time after transition to fASP of six months. There was a trend to a global glycemic control improvement at six months after starting fASP: numeric increase in time in range (56.40 ± 12.62% vs 60.15 ± 13.53%, p=0.148), reduction in time above range (37.76 ± 13.05% vs 34.67 ± 14.94%, p=0.557), time below range (6.00 (5.00)% vs 4.50 (5.25)%, p=0.122), and mean glucose (174.29 ± 25.14 mg/dL vs 167.00 ± 25.30 mg/dL, p=0.207). There was a reduction in body mass index (BMI) at six months after switching to fASP (25.08 (4.59) kg/m(2 )vs 24.45 (3.05) kg/m(2), p=0.010), despite the absence of a significant variation in total daily insulin. Adverse event and discontinuation rates were 7.8% and 6.5%, respectively, with no documented episodes of diabetic ketoacidosis or severe hypoglycemia. Conclusions fASP proved to be a safe and effective therapeutic option in CSII systems associated with a significant BMI reduction, aspects that might justify its preference.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9509526
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95095262022-09-28 Faster Insulin Aspart for Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion: Is It Worth It? Rosinha, Patrícia Teixeira, Sofia Vilaverde, Joana Cardoso, Maria Helena Cureus Endocrinology/Diabetes/Metabolism Introduction Faster insulin aspart (fASP) is the new formulation of insulin aspart (ASP) with a left-shifted pharmacokinetic profile, allowing better control of early postprandial hyperglycemia and a reduction in the risk of late post-meal hypoglycemia. However, it can be associated with more frequent infusion set changes. The purpose of this study is to evaluate efficacy and safety one, three, and six months after starting fASP in continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) systems. Methods This is a retrospective study that included adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus, users of CSII ≥3 months, who started fASP. Exclusion criteria included less than one month of follow-up after the intervention, concomitant initiation of pharmacological therapy, pre-conception period, and non-use of continuous glucose monitoring. Results A total of 77 individuals were included, of which 52 (67.5%) were female, aged 39.87 ± 13.10 years, with a mean time under CSII of 7.30 ± 3.58 years and a median follow-up time after transition to fASP of six months. There was a trend to a global glycemic control improvement at six months after starting fASP: numeric increase in time in range (56.40 ± 12.62% vs 60.15 ± 13.53%, p=0.148), reduction in time above range (37.76 ± 13.05% vs 34.67 ± 14.94%, p=0.557), time below range (6.00 (5.00)% vs 4.50 (5.25)%, p=0.122), and mean glucose (174.29 ± 25.14 mg/dL vs 167.00 ± 25.30 mg/dL, p=0.207). There was a reduction in body mass index (BMI) at six months after switching to fASP (25.08 (4.59) kg/m(2 )vs 24.45 (3.05) kg/m(2), p=0.010), despite the absence of a significant variation in total daily insulin. Adverse event and discontinuation rates were 7.8% and 6.5%, respectively, with no documented episodes of diabetic ketoacidosis or severe hypoglycemia. Conclusions fASP proved to be a safe and effective therapeutic option in CSII systems associated with a significant BMI reduction, aspects that might justify its preference. Cureus 2022-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9509526/ /pubmed/36176818 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.28422 Text en Copyright © 2022, Rosinha et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Endocrinology/Diabetes/Metabolism
Rosinha, Patrícia
Teixeira, Sofia
Vilaverde, Joana
Cardoso, Maria Helena
Faster Insulin Aspart for Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion: Is It Worth It?
title Faster Insulin Aspart for Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion: Is It Worth It?
title_full Faster Insulin Aspart for Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion: Is It Worth It?
title_fullStr Faster Insulin Aspart for Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion: Is It Worth It?
title_full_unstemmed Faster Insulin Aspart for Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion: Is It Worth It?
title_short Faster Insulin Aspart for Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion: Is It Worth It?
title_sort faster insulin aspart for continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion: is it worth it?
topic Endocrinology/Diabetes/Metabolism
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9509526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36176818
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.28422
work_keys_str_mv AT rosinhapatricia fasterinsulinaspartforcontinuoussubcutaneousinsulininfusionisitworthit
AT teixeirasofia fasterinsulinaspartforcontinuoussubcutaneousinsulininfusionisitworthit
AT vilaverdejoana fasterinsulinaspartforcontinuoussubcutaneousinsulininfusionisitworthit
AT cardosomariahelena fasterinsulinaspartforcontinuoussubcutaneousinsulininfusionisitworthit