Cargando…

Recovery Colleges Characterisation and Testing in England (RECOLLECT): rationale and protocol

BACKGROUND: Recovery Colleges are a relatively recent initiative within mental health services. The first opened in 2009 in London and since then numbers have grown. They are based on principles of personal recovery in mental health, co-production between people with lived experience of mental healt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hayes, Daniel, Henderson, Claire, Bakolis, Ioannis, Lawrence, Vanessa, Elliott, Rachel A., Ronaldson, Amy, Richards, Gabrielle, Repper, Julie, Bates, Peter, Brewin, John, Meddings, Sara, Winship, Gary, Bishop, Simon, Emsley, Richard, Elton, Daniel, McNaughton, Rebecca, Whitley, Rob, Smelson, David, Stepanian, Katy, McPhilbin, Merly, Dunnett, Danielle, Hunter-Brown, Holly, Yeo, Caroline, Jebara, Tesnime, Slade, Mike
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9509550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36153488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04253-y
_version_ 1784797248637370368
author Hayes, Daniel
Henderson, Claire
Bakolis, Ioannis
Lawrence, Vanessa
Elliott, Rachel A.
Ronaldson, Amy
Richards, Gabrielle
Repper, Julie
Bates, Peter
Brewin, John
Meddings, Sara
Winship, Gary
Bishop, Simon
Emsley, Richard
Elton, Daniel
McNaughton, Rebecca
Whitley, Rob
Smelson, David
Stepanian, Katy
McPhilbin, Merly
Dunnett, Danielle
Hunter-Brown, Holly
Yeo, Caroline
Jebara, Tesnime
Slade, Mike
author_facet Hayes, Daniel
Henderson, Claire
Bakolis, Ioannis
Lawrence, Vanessa
Elliott, Rachel A.
Ronaldson, Amy
Richards, Gabrielle
Repper, Julie
Bates, Peter
Brewin, John
Meddings, Sara
Winship, Gary
Bishop, Simon
Emsley, Richard
Elton, Daniel
McNaughton, Rebecca
Whitley, Rob
Smelson, David
Stepanian, Katy
McPhilbin, Merly
Dunnett, Danielle
Hunter-Brown, Holly
Yeo, Caroline
Jebara, Tesnime
Slade, Mike
author_sort Hayes, Daniel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recovery Colleges are a relatively recent initiative within mental health services. The first opened in 2009 in London and since then numbers have grown. They are based on principles of personal recovery in mental health, co-production between people with lived experience of mental health problems and professionals, and adult learning. Student eligibility criteria vary, but all serve people who use mental health services, with empirical evidence of benefit. Previously we developed a Recovery College fidelity measure and a preliminary change model identifying the mechanisms of action and outcomes for this group, which we refer to as service user students. The Recovery Colleges Characterisation and Testing (RECOLLECT) study is a five-year (2020–2025) programme of research in England. The aim of RECOLLECT is to determine Recovery Colleges’ effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, and identify organisational influences on fidelity and improvements in mental health outcomes.  METHODS: RECOLLECT comprises i) a national survey of Recovery Colleges, ii) a prospective cohort study to establish the relationship between fidelity, mechanisms of action and psychosocial outcomes, iii) a prospective cohort study to investigate effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, iv) a retrospective cohort study to determine the relationship between Recovery College use and outcomes and mental health service use, and v) organisational case studies to establish the contextual and organisational factors influencing fidelity and outcomes. The programme has been developed with input from individuals who have lived experience of mental health problems. A Lived Experience Advisory Panel will provide input into all stages of the research. DISCUSSION: RECOLLECT will provide the first rigorous evidence on the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of Recovery Colleges in England, to inform their prioritising, commissioning, and running. The validated RECOLLECT multilevel change model will confirm the active components of Recovery Colleges. The fidelity measure and evidence about the fidelity-outcome relationship will provide an empirically-based approach to develop Recovery Colleges, to maximise benefits for students. Findings will be disseminated through the study website (researchintorecovery.com/recollect) and via national and international Recovery College networks to maximise impact, and will shape policy on how Recovery Colleges can help those with mental health problems lead empowered, meaningful and fulfilling lives.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9509550
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95095502022-09-26 Recovery Colleges Characterisation and Testing in England (RECOLLECT): rationale and protocol Hayes, Daniel Henderson, Claire Bakolis, Ioannis Lawrence, Vanessa Elliott, Rachel A. Ronaldson, Amy Richards, Gabrielle Repper, Julie Bates, Peter Brewin, John Meddings, Sara Winship, Gary Bishop, Simon Emsley, Richard Elton, Daniel McNaughton, Rebecca Whitley, Rob Smelson, David Stepanian, Katy McPhilbin, Merly Dunnett, Danielle Hunter-Brown, Holly Yeo, Caroline Jebara, Tesnime Slade, Mike BMC Psychiatry Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Recovery Colleges are a relatively recent initiative within mental health services. The first opened in 2009 in London and since then numbers have grown. They are based on principles of personal recovery in mental health, co-production between people with lived experience of mental health problems and professionals, and adult learning. Student eligibility criteria vary, but all serve people who use mental health services, with empirical evidence of benefit. Previously we developed a Recovery College fidelity measure and a preliminary change model identifying the mechanisms of action and outcomes for this group, which we refer to as service user students. The Recovery Colleges Characterisation and Testing (RECOLLECT) study is a five-year (2020–2025) programme of research in England. The aim of RECOLLECT is to determine Recovery Colleges’ effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, and identify organisational influences on fidelity and improvements in mental health outcomes.  METHODS: RECOLLECT comprises i) a national survey of Recovery Colleges, ii) a prospective cohort study to establish the relationship between fidelity, mechanisms of action and psychosocial outcomes, iii) a prospective cohort study to investigate effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, iv) a retrospective cohort study to determine the relationship between Recovery College use and outcomes and mental health service use, and v) organisational case studies to establish the contextual and organisational factors influencing fidelity and outcomes. The programme has been developed with input from individuals who have lived experience of mental health problems. A Lived Experience Advisory Panel will provide input into all stages of the research. DISCUSSION: RECOLLECT will provide the first rigorous evidence on the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of Recovery Colleges in England, to inform their prioritising, commissioning, and running. The validated RECOLLECT multilevel change model will confirm the active components of Recovery Colleges. The fidelity measure and evidence about the fidelity-outcome relationship will provide an empirically-based approach to develop Recovery Colleges, to maximise benefits for students. Findings will be disseminated through the study website (researchintorecovery.com/recollect) and via national and international Recovery College networks to maximise impact, and will shape policy on how Recovery Colleges can help those with mental health problems lead empowered, meaningful and fulfilling lives. BioMed Central 2022-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9509550/ /pubmed/36153488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04253-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Hayes, Daniel
Henderson, Claire
Bakolis, Ioannis
Lawrence, Vanessa
Elliott, Rachel A.
Ronaldson, Amy
Richards, Gabrielle
Repper, Julie
Bates, Peter
Brewin, John
Meddings, Sara
Winship, Gary
Bishop, Simon
Emsley, Richard
Elton, Daniel
McNaughton, Rebecca
Whitley, Rob
Smelson, David
Stepanian, Katy
McPhilbin, Merly
Dunnett, Danielle
Hunter-Brown, Holly
Yeo, Caroline
Jebara, Tesnime
Slade, Mike
Recovery Colleges Characterisation and Testing in England (RECOLLECT): rationale and protocol
title Recovery Colleges Characterisation and Testing in England (RECOLLECT): rationale and protocol
title_full Recovery Colleges Characterisation and Testing in England (RECOLLECT): rationale and protocol
title_fullStr Recovery Colleges Characterisation and Testing in England (RECOLLECT): rationale and protocol
title_full_unstemmed Recovery Colleges Characterisation and Testing in England (RECOLLECT): rationale and protocol
title_short Recovery Colleges Characterisation and Testing in England (RECOLLECT): rationale and protocol
title_sort recovery colleges characterisation and testing in england (recollect): rationale and protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9509550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36153488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04253-y
work_keys_str_mv AT hayesdaniel recoverycollegescharacterisationandtestinginenglandrecollectrationaleandprotocol
AT hendersonclaire recoverycollegescharacterisationandtestinginenglandrecollectrationaleandprotocol
AT bakolisioannis recoverycollegescharacterisationandtestinginenglandrecollectrationaleandprotocol
AT lawrencevanessa recoverycollegescharacterisationandtestinginenglandrecollectrationaleandprotocol
AT elliottrachela recoverycollegescharacterisationandtestinginenglandrecollectrationaleandprotocol
AT ronaldsonamy recoverycollegescharacterisationandtestinginenglandrecollectrationaleandprotocol
AT richardsgabrielle recoverycollegescharacterisationandtestinginenglandrecollectrationaleandprotocol
AT repperjulie recoverycollegescharacterisationandtestinginenglandrecollectrationaleandprotocol
AT batespeter recoverycollegescharacterisationandtestinginenglandrecollectrationaleandprotocol
AT brewinjohn recoverycollegescharacterisationandtestinginenglandrecollectrationaleandprotocol
AT meddingssara recoverycollegescharacterisationandtestinginenglandrecollectrationaleandprotocol
AT winshipgary recoverycollegescharacterisationandtestinginenglandrecollectrationaleandprotocol
AT bishopsimon recoverycollegescharacterisationandtestinginenglandrecollectrationaleandprotocol
AT emsleyrichard recoverycollegescharacterisationandtestinginenglandrecollectrationaleandprotocol
AT eltondaniel recoverycollegescharacterisationandtestinginenglandrecollectrationaleandprotocol
AT mcnaughtonrebecca recoverycollegescharacterisationandtestinginenglandrecollectrationaleandprotocol
AT whitleyrob recoverycollegescharacterisationandtestinginenglandrecollectrationaleandprotocol
AT smelsondavid recoverycollegescharacterisationandtestinginenglandrecollectrationaleandprotocol
AT stepaniankaty recoverycollegescharacterisationandtestinginenglandrecollectrationaleandprotocol
AT mcphilbinmerly recoverycollegescharacterisationandtestinginenglandrecollectrationaleandprotocol
AT dunnettdanielle recoverycollegescharacterisationandtestinginenglandrecollectrationaleandprotocol
AT hunterbrownholly recoverycollegescharacterisationandtestinginenglandrecollectrationaleandprotocol
AT yeocaroline recoverycollegescharacterisationandtestinginenglandrecollectrationaleandprotocol
AT jebaratesnime recoverycollegescharacterisationandtestinginenglandrecollectrationaleandprotocol
AT slademike recoverycollegescharacterisationandtestinginenglandrecollectrationaleandprotocol