Cargando…
Impact of emergency physician-performed ultrasound for the evaluation of patients with acute abdominal pain, prospective randomized dual Centre study: study protocol for a diagnostic trial
BACKGROUND: Abdominal pain is frequent in patients consulting in emergency departments. The aim of this study is to determine the diagnosis efficacy of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in patients consulting in the ED for acute abdominal pain by comparing the rate of exact diagnostic between the two...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9509618/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36153600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06755-2 |
_version_ | 1784797266457919488 |
---|---|
author | Brau, François Martin, Stéphanie Le Bastard, Quentin Ricaud, Patricia Legrand, Arnaud Montassier, Emmanuel Le Conte, Philippe |
author_facet | Brau, François Martin, Stéphanie Le Bastard, Quentin Ricaud, Patricia Legrand, Arnaud Montassier, Emmanuel Le Conte, Philippe |
author_sort | Brau, François |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Abdominal pain is frequent in patients consulting in emergency departments. The aim of this study is to determine the diagnosis efficacy of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in patients consulting in the ED for acute abdominal pain by comparing the rate of exact diagnostic between the two arms (with or without POCUS), according to the index diagnostic established by an adjudication committee. METHODS: It is a randomized, controlled, open and interventional study in two emergency departments. The included patients will be adults admitted for acute abdominal pain. Exclusion criteria will be a documented end-of-life, an immediate need of life-support therapy and pregnant or breast-feeding women. Patients will be randomized in intervention (POCUS) or control groups. POCUS will only be performed by trained physicians and will be added to the diagnosis procedure in the intervention group. In the control group, the diagnosis will be established after clinical examination and reception of biological analysis results. In the interventional group, the diagnosis will be established after a clinical exam, biological analysis reception and POCUS. An adjudication committee will review all data from case report forms and will determine the index diagnosis which will be used for the analysis. The primary endpoint will be the comparison of the rate of exact diagnostic between the two arms according to the adjudication committee diagnostic. Secondary endpoints will be the comparison between the two groups for diagnostic delay, duration of ED stay, diagnostic performances for non-specific abdominal pain and hospitalization rate. The primary endpoint will be compared between the two groups using a mixed model taking into account the recruiting centre. Delays will be compared by a mixed linear generalized model. Diagnostic performances will be estimated with their 95% confidence intervals. For a correct diagnostic rate of 57% in the control group and 74% in the intervention group with a 0.05 alpha risk and a 80% power, 244 patients will be required. DISCUSSION: POCUS diagnostic abilities have been mainly demonstrated in monocentric studies but the level of evidence of its diagnostic efficacy remains controversial in particular in Europe. The aim of this study is to address this question with a rigorous methodology. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04912206. Registered on June 3, 2021. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9509618 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95096182022-09-26 Impact of emergency physician-performed ultrasound for the evaluation of patients with acute abdominal pain, prospective randomized dual Centre study: study protocol for a diagnostic trial Brau, François Martin, Stéphanie Le Bastard, Quentin Ricaud, Patricia Legrand, Arnaud Montassier, Emmanuel Le Conte, Philippe Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Abdominal pain is frequent in patients consulting in emergency departments. The aim of this study is to determine the diagnosis efficacy of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in patients consulting in the ED for acute abdominal pain by comparing the rate of exact diagnostic between the two arms (with or without POCUS), according to the index diagnostic established by an adjudication committee. METHODS: It is a randomized, controlled, open and interventional study in two emergency departments. The included patients will be adults admitted for acute abdominal pain. Exclusion criteria will be a documented end-of-life, an immediate need of life-support therapy and pregnant or breast-feeding women. Patients will be randomized in intervention (POCUS) or control groups. POCUS will only be performed by trained physicians and will be added to the diagnosis procedure in the intervention group. In the control group, the diagnosis will be established after clinical examination and reception of biological analysis results. In the interventional group, the diagnosis will be established after a clinical exam, biological analysis reception and POCUS. An adjudication committee will review all data from case report forms and will determine the index diagnosis which will be used for the analysis. The primary endpoint will be the comparison of the rate of exact diagnostic between the two arms according to the adjudication committee diagnostic. Secondary endpoints will be the comparison between the two groups for diagnostic delay, duration of ED stay, diagnostic performances for non-specific abdominal pain and hospitalization rate. The primary endpoint will be compared between the two groups using a mixed model taking into account the recruiting centre. Delays will be compared by a mixed linear generalized model. Diagnostic performances will be estimated with their 95% confidence intervals. For a correct diagnostic rate of 57% in the control group and 74% in the intervention group with a 0.05 alpha risk and a 80% power, 244 patients will be required. DISCUSSION: POCUS diagnostic abilities have been mainly demonstrated in monocentric studies but the level of evidence of its diagnostic efficacy remains controversial in particular in Europe. The aim of this study is to address this question with a rigorous methodology. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04912206. Registered on June 3, 2021. BioMed Central 2022-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9509618/ /pubmed/36153600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06755-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Brau, François Martin, Stéphanie Le Bastard, Quentin Ricaud, Patricia Legrand, Arnaud Montassier, Emmanuel Le Conte, Philippe Impact of emergency physician-performed ultrasound for the evaluation of patients with acute abdominal pain, prospective randomized dual Centre study: study protocol for a diagnostic trial |
title | Impact of emergency physician-performed ultrasound for the evaluation of patients with acute abdominal pain, prospective randomized dual Centre study: study protocol for a diagnostic trial |
title_full | Impact of emergency physician-performed ultrasound for the evaluation of patients with acute abdominal pain, prospective randomized dual Centre study: study protocol for a diagnostic trial |
title_fullStr | Impact of emergency physician-performed ultrasound for the evaluation of patients with acute abdominal pain, prospective randomized dual Centre study: study protocol for a diagnostic trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of emergency physician-performed ultrasound for the evaluation of patients with acute abdominal pain, prospective randomized dual Centre study: study protocol for a diagnostic trial |
title_short | Impact of emergency physician-performed ultrasound for the evaluation of patients with acute abdominal pain, prospective randomized dual Centre study: study protocol for a diagnostic trial |
title_sort | impact of emergency physician-performed ultrasound for the evaluation of patients with acute abdominal pain, prospective randomized dual centre study: study protocol for a diagnostic trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9509618/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36153600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06755-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT braufrancois impactofemergencyphysicianperformedultrasoundfortheevaluationofpatientswithacuteabdominalpainprospectiverandomizeddualcentrestudystudyprotocolforadiagnostictrial AT martinstephanie impactofemergencyphysicianperformedultrasoundfortheevaluationofpatientswithacuteabdominalpainprospectiverandomizeddualcentrestudystudyprotocolforadiagnostictrial AT lebastardquentin impactofemergencyphysicianperformedultrasoundfortheevaluationofpatientswithacuteabdominalpainprospectiverandomizeddualcentrestudystudyprotocolforadiagnostictrial AT ricaudpatricia impactofemergencyphysicianperformedultrasoundfortheevaluationofpatientswithacuteabdominalpainprospectiverandomizeddualcentrestudystudyprotocolforadiagnostictrial AT legrandarnaud impactofemergencyphysicianperformedultrasoundfortheevaluationofpatientswithacuteabdominalpainprospectiverandomizeddualcentrestudystudyprotocolforadiagnostictrial AT montassieremmanuel impactofemergencyphysicianperformedultrasoundfortheevaluationofpatientswithacuteabdominalpainprospectiverandomizeddualcentrestudystudyprotocolforadiagnostictrial AT lecontephilippe impactofemergencyphysicianperformedultrasoundfortheevaluationofpatientswithacuteabdominalpainprospectiverandomizeddualcentrestudystudyprotocolforadiagnostictrial |