Cargando…

Impact of emergency physician-performed ultrasound for the evaluation of patients with acute abdominal pain, prospective randomized dual Centre study: study protocol for a diagnostic trial

BACKGROUND: Abdominal pain is frequent in patients consulting in emergency departments. The aim of this study is to determine the diagnosis efficacy of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in patients consulting in the ED for acute abdominal pain by comparing the rate of exact diagnostic between the two...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brau, François, Martin, Stéphanie, Le Bastard, Quentin, Ricaud, Patricia, Legrand, Arnaud, Montassier, Emmanuel, Le Conte, Philippe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9509618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36153600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06755-2
_version_ 1784797266457919488
author Brau, François
Martin, Stéphanie
Le Bastard, Quentin
Ricaud, Patricia
Legrand, Arnaud
Montassier, Emmanuel
Le Conte, Philippe
author_facet Brau, François
Martin, Stéphanie
Le Bastard, Quentin
Ricaud, Patricia
Legrand, Arnaud
Montassier, Emmanuel
Le Conte, Philippe
author_sort Brau, François
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Abdominal pain is frequent in patients consulting in emergency departments. The aim of this study is to determine the diagnosis efficacy of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in patients consulting in the ED for acute abdominal pain by comparing the rate of exact diagnostic between the two arms (with or without POCUS), according to the index diagnostic established by an adjudication committee. METHODS: It is a randomized, controlled, open and interventional study in two emergency departments. The included patients will be adults admitted for acute abdominal pain. Exclusion criteria will be a documented end-of-life, an immediate need of life-support therapy and pregnant or breast-feeding women. Patients will be randomized in intervention (POCUS) or control groups. POCUS will only be performed by trained physicians and will be added to the diagnosis procedure in the intervention group. In the control group, the diagnosis will be established after clinical examination and reception of biological analysis results. In the interventional group, the diagnosis will be established after a clinical exam, biological analysis reception and POCUS. An adjudication committee will review all data from case report forms and will determine the index diagnosis which will be used for the analysis. The primary endpoint will be the comparison of the rate of exact diagnostic between the two arms according to the adjudication committee diagnostic. Secondary endpoints will be the comparison between the two groups for diagnostic delay, duration of ED stay, diagnostic performances for non-specific abdominal pain and hospitalization rate. The primary endpoint will be compared between the two groups using a mixed model taking into account the recruiting centre. Delays will be compared by a mixed linear generalized model. Diagnostic performances will be estimated with their 95% confidence intervals. For a correct diagnostic rate of 57% in the control group and 74% in the intervention group with a 0.05 alpha risk and a 80% power, 244 patients will be required. DISCUSSION: POCUS diagnostic abilities have been mainly demonstrated in monocentric studies but the level of evidence of its diagnostic efficacy remains controversial in particular in Europe. The aim of this study is to address this question with a rigorous methodology. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04912206. Registered on June 3, 2021.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9509618
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95096182022-09-26 Impact of emergency physician-performed ultrasound for the evaluation of patients with acute abdominal pain, prospective randomized dual Centre study: study protocol for a diagnostic trial Brau, François Martin, Stéphanie Le Bastard, Quentin Ricaud, Patricia Legrand, Arnaud Montassier, Emmanuel Le Conte, Philippe Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Abdominal pain is frequent in patients consulting in emergency departments. The aim of this study is to determine the diagnosis efficacy of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in patients consulting in the ED for acute abdominal pain by comparing the rate of exact diagnostic between the two arms (with or without POCUS), according to the index diagnostic established by an adjudication committee. METHODS: It is a randomized, controlled, open and interventional study in two emergency departments. The included patients will be adults admitted for acute abdominal pain. Exclusion criteria will be a documented end-of-life, an immediate need of life-support therapy and pregnant or breast-feeding women. Patients will be randomized in intervention (POCUS) or control groups. POCUS will only be performed by trained physicians and will be added to the diagnosis procedure in the intervention group. In the control group, the diagnosis will be established after clinical examination and reception of biological analysis results. In the interventional group, the diagnosis will be established after a clinical exam, biological analysis reception and POCUS. An adjudication committee will review all data from case report forms and will determine the index diagnosis which will be used for the analysis. The primary endpoint will be the comparison of the rate of exact diagnostic between the two arms according to the adjudication committee diagnostic. Secondary endpoints will be the comparison between the two groups for diagnostic delay, duration of ED stay, diagnostic performances for non-specific abdominal pain and hospitalization rate. The primary endpoint will be compared between the two groups using a mixed model taking into account the recruiting centre. Delays will be compared by a mixed linear generalized model. Diagnostic performances will be estimated with their 95% confidence intervals. For a correct diagnostic rate of 57% in the control group and 74% in the intervention group with a 0.05 alpha risk and a 80% power, 244 patients will be required. DISCUSSION: POCUS diagnostic abilities have been mainly demonstrated in monocentric studies but the level of evidence of its diagnostic efficacy remains controversial in particular in Europe. The aim of this study is to address this question with a rigorous methodology. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04912206. Registered on June 3, 2021. BioMed Central 2022-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9509618/ /pubmed/36153600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06755-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Brau, François
Martin, Stéphanie
Le Bastard, Quentin
Ricaud, Patricia
Legrand, Arnaud
Montassier, Emmanuel
Le Conte, Philippe
Impact of emergency physician-performed ultrasound for the evaluation of patients with acute abdominal pain, prospective randomized dual Centre study: study protocol for a diagnostic trial
title Impact of emergency physician-performed ultrasound for the evaluation of patients with acute abdominal pain, prospective randomized dual Centre study: study protocol for a diagnostic trial
title_full Impact of emergency physician-performed ultrasound for the evaluation of patients with acute abdominal pain, prospective randomized dual Centre study: study protocol for a diagnostic trial
title_fullStr Impact of emergency physician-performed ultrasound for the evaluation of patients with acute abdominal pain, prospective randomized dual Centre study: study protocol for a diagnostic trial
title_full_unstemmed Impact of emergency physician-performed ultrasound for the evaluation of patients with acute abdominal pain, prospective randomized dual Centre study: study protocol for a diagnostic trial
title_short Impact of emergency physician-performed ultrasound for the evaluation of patients with acute abdominal pain, prospective randomized dual Centre study: study protocol for a diagnostic trial
title_sort impact of emergency physician-performed ultrasound for the evaluation of patients with acute abdominal pain, prospective randomized dual centre study: study protocol for a diagnostic trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9509618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36153600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06755-2
work_keys_str_mv AT braufrancois impactofemergencyphysicianperformedultrasoundfortheevaluationofpatientswithacuteabdominalpainprospectiverandomizeddualcentrestudystudyprotocolforadiagnostictrial
AT martinstephanie impactofemergencyphysicianperformedultrasoundfortheevaluationofpatientswithacuteabdominalpainprospectiverandomizeddualcentrestudystudyprotocolforadiagnostictrial
AT lebastardquentin impactofemergencyphysicianperformedultrasoundfortheevaluationofpatientswithacuteabdominalpainprospectiverandomizeddualcentrestudystudyprotocolforadiagnostictrial
AT ricaudpatricia impactofemergencyphysicianperformedultrasoundfortheevaluationofpatientswithacuteabdominalpainprospectiverandomizeddualcentrestudystudyprotocolforadiagnostictrial
AT legrandarnaud impactofemergencyphysicianperformedultrasoundfortheevaluationofpatientswithacuteabdominalpainprospectiverandomizeddualcentrestudystudyprotocolforadiagnostictrial
AT montassieremmanuel impactofemergencyphysicianperformedultrasoundfortheevaluationofpatientswithacuteabdominalpainprospectiverandomizeddualcentrestudystudyprotocolforadiagnostictrial
AT lecontephilippe impactofemergencyphysicianperformedultrasoundfortheevaluationofpatientswithacuteabdominalpainprospectiverandomizeddualcentrestudystudyprotocolforadiagnostictrial