Cargando…
The economics of adaptations to evidence-based practices
BACKGROUND: Evidence-based practices (EBPs) are frequently adapted in response to the dynamic contexts in which they are implemented. Adaptation is defined as the degree to which an EBP is altered to fit the setting or to improve fit to local context and can be planned or unplanned. Although adaptat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9509646/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36153575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00345-8 |
_version_ | 1784797273869254656 |
---|---|
author | Salloum, Ramzi G. Wagner, Todd H. Midboe, Amanda M. Daniels, Sarah I. Quanbeck, Andrew Chambers, David A. |
author_facet | Salloum, Ramzi G. Wagner, Todd H. Midboe, Amanda M. Daniels, Sarah I. Quanbeck, Andrew Chambers, David A. |
author_sort | Salloum, Ramzi G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Evidence-based practices (EBPs) are frequently adapted in response to the dynamic contexts in which they are implemented. Adaptation is defined as the degree to which an EBP is altered to fit the setting or to improve fit to local context and can be planned or unplanned. Although adaptations are common and necessary to maximizing the marginal impact of EBPs, little attention has been given to the economic consequences and how adaptations affect marginal costs. DISCUSSION: In assessing the economic consequences of adaptation, one should consider its impact on core components, the planned adaptive periphery, and the unplanned adaptive periphery. Guided by implementation science frameworks, we examine how various economic evaluation approaches accommodate the influence of adaptations and discuss the pros and cons of these approaches. Using the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based interventions (FRAME), mixed methods can elucidate the economic reasons driving the adaptations. Micro-costing approaches are applied in research that integrates the adaptation of EBPs at the planning stage using innovative, adaptive study designs. In contrast, evaluation of unplanned adaptation is subject to confounding and requires sensitivity analysis to address unobservable measures and other uncertainties. A case study is presented using the RE-AIM framework to illustrate the costing of adaptations. In addition to empirical approaches to evaluating adaptation, simulation modeling approaches can be used to overcome limited follow-up in implementation studies. CONCLUSIONS: As implementation science evolves to improve our understanding of the mechanisms and implications of adaptations, it is increasingly important to understand the economic implications of such adaptations, in addition to their impact on clinical effectiveness. Therefore, explicit consideration is warranted of how costs can be evaluated as outcomes of adaptations to the delivery of EBPs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9509646 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95096462022-09-26 The economics of adaptations to evidence-based practices Salloum, Ramzi G. Wagner, Todd H. Midboe, Amanda M. Daniels, Sarah I. Quanbeck, Andrew Chambers, David A. Implement Sci Commun Debate BACKGROUND: Evidence-based practices (EBPs) are frequently adapted in response to the dynamic contexts in which they are implemented. Adaptation is defined as the degree to which an EBP is altered to fit the setting or to improve fit to local context and can be planned or unplanned. Although adaptations are common and necessary to maximizing the marginal impact of EBPs, little attention has been given to the economic consequences and how adaptations affect marginal costs. DISCUSSION: In assessing the economic consequences of adaptation, one should consider its impact on core components, the planned adaptive periphery, and the unplanned adaptive periphery. Guided by implementation science frameworks, we examine how various economic evaluation approaches accommodate the influence of adaptations and discuss the pros and cons of these approaches. Using the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based interventions (FRAME), mixed methods can elucidate the economic reasons driving the adaptations. Micro-costing approaches are applied in research that integrates the adaptation of EBPs at the planning stage using innovative, adaptive study designs. In contrast, evaluation of unplanned adaptation is subject to confounding and requires sensitivity analysis to address unobservable measures and other uncertainties. A case study is presented using the RE-AIM framework to illustrate the costing of adaptations. In addition to empirical approaches to evaluating adaptation, simulation modeling approaches can be used to overcome limited follow-up in implementation studies. CONCLUSIONS: As implementation science evolves to improve our understanding of the mechanisms and implications of adaptations, it is increasingly important to understand the economic implications of such adaptations, in addition to their impact on clinical effectiveness. Therefore, explicit consideration is warranted of how costs can be evaluated as outcomes of adaptations to the delivery of EBPs. BioMed Central 2022-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9509646/ /pubmed/36153575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00345-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Debate Salloum, Ramzi G. Wagner, Todd H. Midboe, Amanda M. Daniels, Sarah I. Quanbeck, Andrew Chambers, David A. The economics of adaptations to evidence-based practices |
title | The economics of adaptations to evidence-based practices |
title_full | The economics of adaptations to evidence-based practices |
title_fullStr | The economics of adaptations to evidence-based practices |
title_full_unstemmed | The economics of adaptations to evidence-based practices |
title_short | The economics of adaptations to evidence-based practices |
title_sort | economics of adaptations to evidence-based practices |
topic | Debate |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9509646/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36153575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00345-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT salloumramzig theeconomicsofadaptationstoevidencebasedpractices AT wagnertoddh theeconomicsofadaptationstoevidencebasedpractices AT midboeamandam theeconomicsofadaptationstoevidencebasedpractices AT danielssarahi theeconomicsofadaptationstoevidencebasedpractices AT quanbeckandrew theeconomicsofadaptationstoevidencebasedpractices AT chambersdavida theeconomicsofadaptationstoevidencebasedpractices AT salloumramzig economicsofadaptationstoevidencebasedpractices AT wagnertoddh economicsofadaptationstoevidencebasedpractices AT midboeamandam economicsofadaptationstoevidencebasedpractices AT danielssarahi economicsofadaptationstoevidencebasedpractices AT quanbeckandrew economicsofadaptationstoevidencebasedpractices AT chambersdavida economicsofadaptationstoevidencebasedpractices |