Cargando…

The economics of adaptations to evidence-based practices

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based practices (EBPs) are frequently adapted in response to the dynamic contexts in which they are implemented. Adaptation is defined as the degree to which an EBP is altered to fit the setting or to improve fit to local context and can be planned or unplanned. Although adaptat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salloum, Ramzi G., Wagner, Todd H., Midboe, Amanda M., Daniels, Sarah I., Quanbeck, Andrew, Chambers, David A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9509646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36153575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00345-8
_version_ 1784797273869254656
author Salloum, Ramzi G.
Wagner, Todd H.
Midboe, Amanda M.
Daniels, Sarah I.
Quanbeck, Andrew
Chambers, David A.
author_facet Salloum, Ramzi G.
Wagner, Todd H.
Midboe, Amanda M.
Daniels, Sarah I.
Quanbeck, Andrew
Chambers, David A.
author_sort Salloum, Ramzi G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evidence-based practices (EBPs) are frequently adapted in response to the dynamic contexts in which they are implemented. Adaptation is defined as the degree to which an EBP is altered to fit the setting or to improve fit to local context and can be planned or unplanned. Although adaptations are common and necessary to maximizing the marginal impact of EBPs, little attention has been given to the economic consequences and how adaptations affect marginal costs. DISCUSSION: In assessing the economic consequences of adaptation, one should consider its impact on core components, the planned adaptive periphery, and the unplanned adaptive periphery. Guided by implementation science frameworks, we examine how various economic evaluation approaches accommodate the influence of adaptations and discuss the pros and cons of these approaches. Using the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based interventions (FRAME), mixed methods can elucidate the economic reasons driving the adaptations. Micro-costing approaches are applied in research that integrates the adaptation of EBPs at the planning stage using innovative, adaptive study designs. In contrast, evaluation of unplanned adaptation is subject to confounding and requires sensitivity analysis to address unobservable measures and other uncertainties. A case study is presented using the RE-AIM framework to illustrate the costing of adaptations. In addition to empirical approaches to evaluating adaptation, simulation modeling approaches can be used to overcome limited follow-up in implementation studies. CONCLUSIONS: As implementation science evolves to improve our understanding of the mechanisms and implications of adaptations, it is increasingly important to understand the economic implications of such adaptations, in addition to their impact on clinical effectiveness. Therefore, explicit consideration is warranted of how costs can be evaluated as outcomes of adaptations to the delivery of EBPs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9509646
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95096462022-09-26 The economics of adaptations to evidence-based practices Salloum, Ramzi G. Wagner, Todd H. Midboe, Amanda M. Daniels, Sarah I. Quanbeck, Andrew Chambers, David A. Implement Sci Commun Debate BACKGROUND: Evidence-based practices (EBPs) are frequently adapted in response to the dynamic contexts in which they are implemented. Adaptation is defined as the degree to which an EBP is altered to fit the setting or to improve fit to local context and can be planned or unplanned. Although adaptations are common and necessary to maximizing the marginal impact of EBPs, little attention has been given to the economic consequences and how adaptations affect marginal costs. DISCUSSION: In assessing the economic consequences of adaptation, one should consider its impact on core components, the planned adaptive periphery, and the unplanned adaptive periphery. Guided by implementation science frameworks, we examine how various economic evaluation approaches accommodate the influence of adaptations and discuss the pros and cons of these approaches. Using the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based interventions (FRAME), mixed methods can elucidate the economic reasons driving the adaptations. Micro-costing approaches are applied in research that integrates the adaptation of EBPs at the planning stage using innovative, adaptive study designs. In contrast, evaluation of unplanned adaptation is subject to confounding and requires sensitivity analysis to address unobservable measures and other uncertainties. A case study is presented using the RE-AIM framework to illustrate the costing of adaptations. In addition to empirical approaches to evaluating adaptation, simulation modeling approaches can be used to overcome limited follow-up in implementation studies. CONCLUSIONS: As implementation science evolves to improve our understanding of the mechanisms and implications of adaptations, it is increasingly important to understand the economic implications of such adaptations, in addition to their impact on clinical effectiveness. Therefore, explicit consideration is warranted of how costs can be evaluated as outcomes of adaptations to the delivery of EBPs. BioMed Central 2022-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9509646/ /pubmed/36153575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00345-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Debate
Salloum, Ramzi G.
Wagner, Todd H.
Midboe, Amanda M.
Daniels, Sarah I.
Quanbeck, Andrew
Chambers, David A.
The economics of adaptations to evidence-based practices
title The economics of adaptations to evidence-based practices
title_full The economics of adaptations to evidence-based practices
title_fullStr The economics of adaptations to evidence-based practices
title_full_unstemmed The economics of adaptations to evidence-based practices
title_short The economics of adaptations to evidence-based practices
title_sort economics of adaptations to evidence-based practices
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9509646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36153575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00345-8
work_keys_str_mv AT salloumramzig theeconomicsofadaptationstoevidencebasedpractices
AT wagnertoddh theeconomicsofadaptationstoevidencebasedpractices
AT midboeamandam theeconomicsofadaptationstoevidencebasedpractices
AT danielssarahi theeconomicsofadaptationstoevidencebasedpractices
AT quanbeckandrew theeconomicsofadaptationstoevidencebasedpractices
AT chambersdavida theeconomicsofadaptationstoevidencebasedpractices
AT salloumramzig economicsofadaptationstoevidencebasedpractices
AT wagnertoddh economicsofadaptationstoevidencebasedpractices
AT midboeamandam economicsofadaptationstoevidencebasedpractices
AT danielssarahi economicsofadaptationstoevidencebasedpractices
AT quanbeckandrew economicsofadaptationstoevidencebasedpractices
AT chambersdavida economicsofadaptationstoevidencebasedpractices