Cargando…

Implementation of continuous temperature monitoring during perioperative care: a feasibility study

BACKGROUND: Continuous body temperature monitoring during perioperative care is enabled by using a non-invasive “zero-heat-flux” (ZHF) device. However, rigorous evaluation of whether continuous monitoring capability improves process of care and patient outcomes is lacking. This study assessed the fe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Munday, Judy, Sturgess, David, Oishi, Sabrina, Bendeich, Jess, Kearney, Allison, Douglas, Clint
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9509652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36153550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-022-00341-w
_version_ 1784797275306852352
author Munday, Judy
Sturgess, David
Oishi, Sabrina
Bendeich, Jess
Kearney, Allison
Douglas, Clint
author_facet Munday, Judy
Sturgess, David
Oishi, Sabrina
Bendeich, Jess
Kearney, Allison
Douglas, Clint
author_sort Munday, Judy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Continuous body temperature monitoring during perioperative care is enabled by using a non-invasive “zero-heat-flux” (ZHF) device. However, rigorous evaluation of whether continuous monitoring capability improves process of care and patient outcomes is lacking. This study assessed the feasibility of a large-scale trial on the impact of continuous ZHF monitoring on perioperative temperature management practices and hypothermia prevention. METHODS: A feasibility study was conducted at a tertiary hospital. Participants included patients undergoing elective surgery under neuraxial or general anesthesia, and perioperative nurses and anesthetists caring for patient participants. Eighty-two patients pre and post introduction of the ZHF device were enrolled. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment and retention, protocol adherence, missing data or device failure, and staff evaluation of intervention feasibility and acceptability. Process of care outcomes included temperature monitoring practices, warming interventions and perioperative hypothermia. RESULTS: There were no adverse events related to the device and feasibility of recruitment was high (60%). Treatment adherence varied across the perioperative pathway (43 to 93%) and missing data due to electronic transfer issues were identified. Provision of ZHF monitoring had most impact on monitoring practices in the Post Anesthetic Care Unit; the impact on intraoperative monitoring practices was minimal. CONCLUSIONS: Enhancements to the design of the ZHF device, particularly for improved data retention and transfer, would be beneficial prior to a large-scale evaluation of whether continuous temperature monitoring will improve patient outcomes. Implementation research designs are needed for future work to improve the complex area of temperature monitoring during surgery.  TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospective registration prior to patient enrolment was obtained from the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) on 16(th) April 2021 (Registration number: ACTRN12621000438853).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9509652
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95096522022-09-26 Implementation of continuous temperature monitoring during perioperative care: a feasibility study Munday, Judy Sturgess, David Oishi, Sabrina Bendeich, Jess Kearney, Allison Douglas, Clint Patient Saf Surg Research BACKGROUND: Continuous body temperature monitoring during perioperative care is enabled by using a non-invasive “zero-heat-flux” (ZHF) device. However, rigorous evaluation of whether continuous monitoring capability improves process of care and patient outcomes is lacking. This study assessed the feasibility of a large-scale trial on the impact of continuous ZHF monitoring on perioperative temperature management practices and hypothermia prevention. METHODS: A feasibility study was conducted at a tertiary hospital. Participants included patients undergoing elective surgery under neuraxial or general anesthesia, and perioperative nurses and anesthetists caring for patient participants. Eighty-two patients pre and post introduction of the ZHF device were enrolled. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment and retention, protocol adherence, missing data or device failure, and staff evaluation of intervention feasibility and acceptability. Process of care outcomes included temperature monitoring practices, warming interventions and perioperative hypothermia. RESULTS: There were no adverse events related to the device and feasibility of recruitment was high (60%). Treatment adherence varied across the perioperative pathway (43 to 93%) and missing data due to electronic transfer issues were identified. Provision of ZHF monitoring had most impact on monitoring practices in the Post Anesthetic Care Unit; the impact on intraoperative monitoring practices was minimal. CONCLUSIONS: Enhancements to the design of the ZHF device, particularly for improved data retention and transfer, would be beneficial prior to a large-scale evaluation of whether continuous temperature monitoring will improve patient outcomes. Implementation research designs are needed for future work to improve the complex area of temperature monitoring during surgery.  TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospective registration prior to patient enrolment was obtained from the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) on 16(th) April 2021 (Registration number: ACTRN12621000438853). BioMed Central 2022-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9509652/ /pubmed/36153550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-022-00341-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Munday, Judy
Sturgess, David
Oishi, Sabrina
Bendeich, Jess
Kearney, Allison
Douglas, Clint
Implementation of continuous temperature monitoring during perioperative care: a feasibility study
title Implementation of continuous temperature monitoring during perioperative care: a feasibility study
title_full Implementation of continuous temperature monitoring during perioperative care: a feasibility study
title_fullStr Implementation of continuous temperature monitoring during perioperative care: a feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of continuous temperature monitoring during perioperative care: a feasibility study
title_short Implementation of continuous temperature monitoring during perioperative care: a feasibility study
title_sort implementation of continuous temperature monitoring during perioperative care: a feasibility study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9509652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36153550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-022-00341-w
work_keys_str_mv AT mundayjudy implementationofcontinuoustemperaturemonitoringduringperioperativecareafeasibilitystudy
AT sturgessdavid implementationofcontinuoustemperaturemonitoringduringperioperativecareafeasibilitystudy
AT oishisabrina implementationofcontinuoustemperaturemonitoringduringperioperativecareafeasibilitystudy
AT bendeichjess implementationofcontinuoustemperaturemonitoringduringperioperativecareafeasibilitystudy
AT kearneyallison implementationofcontinuoustemperaturemonitoringduringperioperativecareafeasibilitystudy
AT douglasclint implementationofcontinuoustemperaturemonitoringduringperioperativecareafeasibilitystudy