Cargando…
P456 Defungi: direct mycological examination of microscopic fungi images
POSTER SESSION 3, SEPTEMBER 23, 2022, 12:30 PM - 1:30 PM: OBJECTIVE: To classify five fungi types using two different deep learning approaches and three different convolutional neural network models, VGG16, Inception V3, and ResNet50. METHOD: A mycological laboratory in Colombia donated the images...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9509849/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mmy/myac072.P456 |
_version_ | 1784797319465533440 |
---|---|
author | Álvarez, María Alejandra Vanegas Sopó, Leticia Sopo, Camilo Javier Pineda Hajati, Farshid Gheisari, Soheil |
author_facet | Álvarez, María Alejandra Vanegas Sopó, Leticia Sopo, Camilo Javier Pineda Hajati, Farshid Gheisari, Soheil |
author_sort | Álvarez, María Alejandra Vanegas |
collection | PubMed |
description | POSTER SESSION 3, SEPTEMBER 23, 2022, 12:30 PM - 1:30 PM: OBJECTIVE: To classify five fungi types using two different deep learning approaches and three different convolutional neural network models, VGG16, Inception V3, and ResNet50. METHOD: A mycological laboratory in Colombia donated the images used for the development of this research work. They were manually labeled into five classes and curated with subject matter expert assistance. The images were later cropped and modified with automated coding routines to produce the final dataset. RESULTS: We present experimental results classifying five types of fungi using two different deep learning approaches and three different convolutional neural network models, VGG16, Inception V3, and ResNet50. The first approach benchmarks the classification performance for the models trained from scratch, while the second approach benchmarks the classification performance using pre-trained models based on the ImageNet dataset. Using k-fold cross-validation testing on the 5-class dataset, the best performing model trained from scratch was Inception V3, reporting 73.2% accuracy. Likewise, the best performing model using transfer learning was VGG16, with 85.04% accuracy. CONCLUSION: The statistics provided by the two approaches create an initial benchmark to encourage future research work to improve classification performance. Furthermore, the dataset built is published on Kaggle and GitHub to encourage future research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9509849 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95098492022-09-26 P456 Defungi: direct mycological examination of microscopic fungi images Álvarez, María Alejandra Vanegas Sopó, Leticia Sopo, Camilo Javier Pineda Hajati, Farshid Gheisari, Soheil Med Mycol Oral Presentations POSTER SESSION 3, SEPTEMBER 23, 2022, 12:30 PM - 1:30 PM: OBJECTIVE: To classify five fungi types using two different deep learning approaches and three different convolutional neural network models, VGG16, Inception V3, and ResNet50. METHOD: A mycological laboratory in Colombia donated the images used for the development of this research work. They were manually labeled into five classes and curated with subject matter expert assistance. The images were later cropped and modified with automated coding routines to produce the final dataset. RESULTS: We present experimental results classifying five types of fungi using two different deep learning approaches and three different convolutional neural network models, VGG16, Inception V3, and ResNet50. The first approach benchmarks the classification performance for the models trained from scratch, while the second approach benchmarks the classification performance using pre-trained models based on the ImageNet dataset. Using k-fold cross-validation testing on the 5-class dataset, the best performing model trained from scratch was Inception V3, reporting 73.2% accuracy. Likewise, the best performing model using transfer learning was VGG16, with 85.04% accuracy. CONCLUSION: The statistics provided by the two approaches create an initial benchmark to encourage future research work to improve classification performance. Furthermore, the dataset built is published on Kaggle and GitHub to encourage future research. Oxford University Press 2022-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9509849/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mmy/myac072.P456 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The International Society for Human and Animal Mycology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Oral Presentations Álvarez, María Alejandra Vanegas Sopó, Leticia Sopo, Camilo Javier Pineda Hajati, Farshid Gheisari, Soheil P456 Defungi: direct mycological examination of microscopic fungi images |
title | P456 Defungi: direct mycological examination of microscopic fungi images |
title_full | P456 Defungi: direct mycological examination of microscopic fungi images |
title_fullStr | P456 Defungi: direct mycological examination of microscopic fungi images |
title_full_unstemmed | P456 Defungi: direct mycological examination of microscopic fungi images |
title_short | P456 Defungi: direct mycological examination of microscopic fungi images |
title_sort | p456 defungi: direct mycological examination of microscopic fungi images |
topic | Oral Presentations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9509849/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mmy/myac072.P456 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alvarezmariaalejandravanegas p456defungidirectmycologicalexaminationofmicroscopicfungiimages AT sopoleticia p456defungidirectmycologicalexaminationofmicroscopicfungiimages AT sopocamilojavierpineda p456defungidirectmycologicalexaminationofmicroscopicfungiimages AT hajatifarshid p456defungidirectmycologicalexaminationofmicroscopicfungiimages AT gheisarisoheil p456defungidirectmycologicalexaminationofmicroscopicfungiimages |