Cargando…
Prevalence of pathogenic germline variants in the circulating tumor DNA testing
BACKGROUND: Somatic and germline variants are not distinguishable by circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing without analyzing non-tumor samples. Although confirmatory germline testing is clinically relevant, the criteria for selecting presumed germline variants have not been established in ctDNA test...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Nature Singapore
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9510107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35870019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10147-022-02220-x |
_version_ | 1784797380115169280 |
---|---|
author | Yamamoto, Yoshihiro Fukuyama, Keita Kanai, Masashi Kondo, Tomohiro Yoshioka, Masahiro Kou, Tadayuki Quy, Pham Nguyen Kimura-Tsuchiya, Reiko Yamada, Takahiro Matsumoto, Shigemi Kosugi, Shinji Muto, Manabu |
author_facet | Yamamoto, Yoshihiro Fukuyama, Keita Kanai, Masashi Kondo, Tomohiro Yoshioka, Masahiro Kou, Tadayuki Quy, Pham Nguyen Kimura-Tsuchiya, Reiko Yamada, Takahiro Matsumoto, Shigemi Kosugi, Shinji Muto, Manabu |
author_sort | Yamamoto, Yoshihiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Somatic and germline variants are not distinguishable by circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing without analyzing non-tumor samples. Although confirmatory germline testing is clinically relevant, the criteria for selecting presumed germline variants have not been established in ctDNA testing. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of pathogenic germline variants in clinical ctDNA testing through their variant allele fractions (VAFs). METHODS: A total of consecutive 106 patients with advanced solid tumors who underwent ctDNA testing (Guardant360(®)) between January 2018 and March 2020 were eligible for this study. To verify the origin of pathogenic variants reported in ctDNA testing, germline sequencing was performed using peripheral blood DNA samples archived in the Clinical Bioresource Center in Kyoto University Hospital (Kyoto, Japan) under clinical research settings. RESULTS: Among 223 pathogenic variants reported in ctDNA testing, the median VAF was 0.9% (0.02–81.8%), and 88 variants with ≥ 1% VAFs were analyzed in germline sequencing. Among 25 variants with ≥ 30% VAFs, seven were found in peripheral blood DNA (BRCA2: n = 6, JAK2: n = 1). In contrast, among the 63 variants with VAFs ranging from 1 to < 30%, only one variant was found in peripheral blood DNA (TP53: n = 1). Eventually, this variant with 15.6% VAF was defined to be an acquired variant, because its allelic distribution did not completely link to those of neighboring germline polymorphisms. CONCLUSION: Our current study demonstrated that VAFs values are helpful for selecting presumed germline variants in clinical ctDNA testing. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10147-022-02220-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9510107 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Nature Singapore |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95101072022-09-27 Prevalence of pathogenic germline variants in the circulating tumor DNA testing Yamamoto, Yoshihiro Fukuyama, Keita Kanai, Masashi Kondo, Tomohiro Yoshioka, Masahiro Kou, Tadayuki Quy, Pham Nguyen Kimura-Tsuchiya, Reiko Yamada, Takahiro Matsumoto, Shigemi Kosugi, Shinji Muto, Manabu Int J Clin Oncol Original Article BACKGROUND: Somatic and germline variants are not distinguishable by circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing without analyzing non-tumor samples. Although confirmatory germline testing is clinically relevant, the criteria for selecting presumed germline variants have not been established in ctDNA testing. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of pathogenic germline variants in clinical ctDNA testing through their variant allele fractions (VAFs). METHODS: A total of consecutive 106 patients with advanced solid tumors who underwent ctDNA testing (Guardant360(®)) between January 2018 and March 2020 were eligible for this study. To verify the origin of pathogenic variants reported in ctDNA testing, germline sequencing was performed using peripheral blood DNA samples archived in the Clinical Bioresource Center in Kyoto University Hospital (Kyoto, Japan) under clinical research settings. RESULTS: Among 223 pathogenic variants reported in ctDNA testing, the median VAF was 0.9% (0.02–81.8%), and 88 variants with ≥ 1% VAFs were analyzed in germline sequencing. Among 25 variants with ≥ 30% VAFs, seven were found in peripheral blood DNA (BRCA2: n = 6, JAK2: n = 1). In contrast, among the 63 variants with VAFs ranging from 1 to < 30%, only one variant was found in peripheral blood DNA (TP53: n = 1). Eventually, this variant with 15.6% VAF was defined to be an acquired variant, because its allelic distribution did not completely link to those of neighboring germline polymorphisms. CONCLUSION: Our current study demonstrated that VAFs values are helpful for selecting presumed germline variants in clinical ctDNA testing. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10147-022-02220-x. Springer Nature Singapore 2022-07-23 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9510107/ /pubmed/35870019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10147-022-02220-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Yamamoto, Yoshihiro Fukuyama, Keita Kanai, Masashi Kondo, Tomohiro Yoshioka, Masahiro Kou, Tadayuki Quy, Pham Nguyen Kimura-Tsuchiya, Reiko Yamada, Takahiro Matsumoto, Shigemi Kosugi, Shinji Muto, Manabu Prevalence of pathogenic germline variants in the circulating tumor DNA testing |
title | Prevalence of pathogenic germline variants in the circulating tumor DNA testing |
title_full | Prevalence of pathogenic germline variants in the circulating tumor DNA testing |
title_fullStr | Prevalence of pathogenic germline variants in the circulating tumor DNA testing |
title_full_unstemmed | Prevalence of pathogenic germline variants in the circulating tumor DNA testing |
title_short | Prevalence of pathogenic germline variants in the circulating tumor DNA testing |
title_sort | prevalence of pathogenic germline variants in the circulating tumor dna testing |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9510107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35870019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10147-022-02220-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yamamotoyoshihiro prevalenceofpathogenicgermlinevariantsinthecirculatingtumordnatesting AT fukuyamakeita prevalenceofpathogenicgermlinevariantsinthecirculatingtumordnatesting AT kanaimasashi prevalenceofpathogenicgermlinevariantsinthecirculatingtumordnatesting AT kondotomohiro prevalenceofpathogenicgermlinevariantsinthecirculatingtumordnatesting AT yoshiokamasahiro prevalenceofpathogenicgermlinevariantsinthecirculatingtumordnatesting AT koutadayuki prevalenceofpathogenicgermlinevariantsinthecirculatingtumordnatesting AT quyphamnguyen prevalenceofpathogenicgermlinevariantsinthecirculatingtumordnatesting AT kimuratsuchiyareiko prevalenceofpathogenicgermlinevariantsinthecirculatingtumordnatesting AT yamadatakahiro prevalenceofpathogenicgermlinevariantsinthecirculatingtumordnatesting AT matsumotoshigemi prevalenceofpathogenicgermlinevariantsinthecirculatingtumordnatesting AT kosugishinji prevalenceofpathogenicgermlinevariantsinthecirculatingtumordnatesting AT mutomanabu prevalenceofpathogenicgermlinevariantsinthecirculatingtumordnatesting |