Cargando…
Disparities in Care Access to Liver-Directed Therapy Among Medicare Beneficiaries with Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis
BACKGROUND: Liver-directed therapies (LDT) are important components of the multidisciplinary care of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM) that contribute to improved long-term outcomes. Factors associated with receipt of LDT are poorly understood. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients &...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9510323/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36149611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12513-0 |
_version_ | 1784797418053697536 |
---|---|
author | Aquina, Christopher T. Brown, Zachary J. Beane, Joal D. Ejaz, Aslam Cloyd, Jordan M. Tsung, Allan Adam, Mohamed O. Pawlik, Timothy M. Kim, Alex C. |
author_facet | Aquina, Christopher T. Brown, Zachary J. Beane, Joal D. Ejaz, Aslam Cloyd, Jordan M. Tsung, Allan Adam, Mohamed O. Pawlik, Timothy M. Kim, Alex C. |
author_sort | Aquina, Christopher T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Liver-directed therapies (LDT) are important components of the multidisciplinary care of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM) that contribute to improved long-term outcomes. Factors associated with receipt of LDT are poorly understood. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients > 65 years old diagnosed with CRCLM were identified within the Medicare Standard Analytic File (2013–2017). Patients with extrahepatic metastatic disease were excluded. Mixed-effects analyses were used to assess patient factors associated with the primary outcome of LDT, defined as hepatectomy, ablation, and/or hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC), as well as the secondary outcome of hepatectomy. RESULTS: Among 23,484 patients with isolated CRCLM, only 2004 (8.5%) received LDT, although resectability status could not be determined for the entire cohort. Among patients who received LDT, 61.7% underwent hepatectomy alone, 28.1% received ablation alone, 8.5% underwent hepatectomy and ablation, and 1.8% received HAIC either alone (0.8%) or in combination with hepatectomy and/or ablation (0.9%). Patient factors independently associated with lower odds of LDT included older age, female sex, Black race, greater comorbidity burden, higher social vulnerability index, primary rectal cancer, synchronous liver metastasis, and further distance from a high-volume liver surgery center (p < 0.05). Results were similar for receipt of hepatectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the well-accepted role of LDT for CRCLM, only a small proportion of Medicare beneficiaries with CRCLM receive LDT. Increasing access to specialized centers with expertise in LDT, particularly for Black patients, female patients, and those with higher levels of social vulnerability or long travel distances, may improve outcomes for patients with CRCLM. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9510323 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95103232022-09-26 Disparities in Care Access to Liver-Directed Therapy Among Medicare Beneficiaries with Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis Aquina, Christopher T. Brown, Zachary J. Beane, Joal D. Ejaz, Aslam Cloyd, Jordan M. Tsung, Allan Adam, Mohamed O. Pawlik, Timothy M. Kim, Alex C. Ann Surg Oncol Hepatobiliary Tumors BACKGROUND: Liver-directed therapies (LDT) are important components of the multidisciplinary care of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM) that contribute to improved long-term outcomes. Factors associated with receipt of LDT are poorly understood. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients > 65 years old diagnosed with CRCLM were identified within the Medicare Standard Analytic File (2013–2017). Patients with extrahepatic metastatic disease were excluded. Mixed-effects analyses were used to assess patient factors associated with the primary outcome of LDT, defined as hepatectomy, ablation, and/or hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC), as well as the secondary outcome of hepatectomy. RESULTS: Among 23,484 patients with isolated CRCLM, only 2004 (8.5%) received LDT, although resectability status could not be determined for the entire cohort. Among patients who received LDT, 61.7% underwent hepatectomy alone, 28.1% received ablation alone, 8.5% underwent hepatectomy and ablation, and 1.8% received HAIC either alone (0.8%) or in combination with hepatectomy and/or ablation (0.9%). Patient factors independently associated with lower odds of LDT included older age, female sex, Black race, greater comorbidity burden, higher social vulnerability index, primary rectal cancer, synchronous liver metastasis, and further distance from a high-volume liver surgery center (p < 0.05). Results were similar for receipt of hepatectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the well-accepted role of LDT for CRCLM, only a small proportion of Medicare beneficiaries with CRCLM receive LDT. Increasing access to specialized centers with expertise in LDT, particularly for Black patients, female patients, and those with higher levels of social vulnerability or long travel distances, may improve outcomes for patients with CRCLM. Springer International Publishing 2022-09-23 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9510323/ /pubmed/36149611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12513-0 Text en © Society of Surgical Oncology 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Hepatobiliary Tumors Aquina, Christopher T. Brown, Zachary J. Beane, Joal D. Ejaz, Aslam Cloyd, Jordan M. Tsung, Allan Adam, Mohamed O. Pawlik, Timothy M. Kim, Alex C. Disparities in Care Access to Liver-Directed Therapy Among Medicare Beneficiaries with Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis |
title | Disparities in Care Access to Liver-Directed Therapy Among Medicare Beneficiaries with Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis |
title_full | Disparities in Care Access to Liver-Directed Therapy Among Medicare Beneficiaries with Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis |
title_fullStr | Disparities in Care Access to Liver-Directed Therapy Among Medicare Beneficiaries with Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis |
title_full_unstemmed | Disparities in Care Access to Liver-Directed Therapy Among Medicare Beneficiaries with Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis |
title_short | Disparities in Care Access to Liver-Directed Therapy Among Medicare Beneficiaries with Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis |
title_sort | disparities in care access to liver-directed therapy among medicare beneficiaries with colorectal cancer liver metastasis |
topic | Hepatobiliary Tumors |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9510323/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36149611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12513-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aquinachristophert disparitiesincareaccesstoliverdirectedtherapyamongmedicarebeneficiarieswithcolorectalcancerlivermetastasis AT brownzacharyj disparitiesincareaccesstoliverdirectedtherapyamongmedicarebeneficiarieswithcolorectalcancerlivermetastasis AT beanejoald disparitiesincareaccesstoliverdirectedtherapyamongmedicarebeneficiarieswithcolorectalcancerlivermetastasis AT ejazaslam disparitiesincareaccesstoliverdirectedtherapyamongmedicarebeneficiarieswithcolorectalcancerlivermetastasis AT cloydjordanm disparitiesincareaccesstoliverdirectedtherapyamongmedicarebeneficiarieswithcolorectalcancerlivermetastasis AT tsungallan disparitiesincareaccesstoliverdirectedtherapyamongmedicarebeneficiarieswithcolorectalcancerlivermetastasis AT adammohamedo disparitiesincareaccesstoliverdirectedtherapyamongmedicarebeneficiarieswithcolorectalcancerlivermetastasis AT pawliktimothym disparitiesincareaccesstoliverdirectedtherapyamongmedicarebeneficiarieswithcolorectalcancerlivermetastasis AT kimalexc disparitiesincareaccesstoliverdirectedtherapyamongmedicarebeneficiarieswithcolorectalcancerlivermetastasis |