Cargando…

Comparison of intravitreal ranibizumab monotherapy vs. ranibizumab combined with dexamethasone implant for macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and the injection number of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) monotherapy vs. intravitreal ranibizumab plus dexamethasone (IVR + DEX) implants for macular edema (ME) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO). METHODS: This prospective, control trial comprised 96 eyes of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liang, Xuemei, Shen, Baiyun, Ou, Zuguo, An, Hongmei, Li, Li
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9510371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36172537
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.930508
_version_ 1784797427222446080
author Liang, Xuemei
Shen, Baiyun
Ou, Zuguo
An, Hongmei
Li, Li
author_facet Liang, Xuemei
Shen, Baiyun
Ou, Zuguo
An, Hongmei
Li, Li
author_sort Liang, Xuemei
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and the injection number of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) monotherapy vs. intravitreal ranibizumab plus dexamethasone (IVR + DEX) implants for macular edema (ME) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO). METHODS: This prospective, control trial comprised 96 eyes of 96 patients with ME due to non-ischemic RVO divided into two groups. The IVR monotherapy group consisted of 61 patients (29 with CRVO and 32 with BRVO) treated with ranibizumab with three consecutive loading doses at a monthly + pro re nata (three + PRN) regimen. The IVR + DEX implant group consisted of 35 patients (19 with CRVO and 16 with BRVO) treated with intravitreal ranibizumab plus DEX implant. All eyes underwent best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, log MAR), central foveal thickness (CFT), and intraocular pressure (IOP). In case of recurrence, each group received initial medication. RESULTS: At the 12-month visit, the mean log MAR BCVA that was improved from baseline was 0.23 with the IVR group and 0.30 with the IVR + DEX group. CFT decreased on average by 420 ± 292 μm with the IVR group and 393 ± 259 μm with the IVR + DEX implant group. No significant differences were detected in BCVA improvement and CFT reduction between the two groups (p > 0.05). The mean number of injections was 5.4 in the IVR group and 3.9 in the IVR + DEX implant group (p < 0.001). The mean reinjection interval for patients with the IVR + DEX implant was 131.2 ± 8.9 days (range: 98–150). The incidence of high IOP and cataract progression were significantly higher in the IVR + DEX implant group than in the IVR group (both p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In RVO-ME, the IVR + DEX implant did not have synergistic efficacy, providing further improvement in BCVA and a reduction in CFT. However, the IVR + DEX implant still had an advantage in reducing the number of injections and prolonging the time between injections.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9510371
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95103712022-09-27 Comparison of intravitreal ranibizumab monotherapy vs. ranibizumab combined with dexamethasone implant for macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion Liang, Xuemei Shen, Baiyun Ou, Zuguo An, Hongmei Li, Li Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and the injection number of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) monotherapy vs. intravitreal ranibizumab plus dexamethasone (IVR + DEX) implants for macular edema (ME) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO). METHODS: This prospective, control trial comprised 96 eyes of 96 patients with ME due to non-ischemic RVO divided into two groups. The IVR monotherapy group consisted of 61 patients (29 with CRVO and 32 with BRVO) treated with ranibizumab with three consecutive loading doses at a monthly + pro re nata (three + PRN) regimen. The IVR + DEX implant group consisted of 35 patients (19 with CRVO and 16 with BRVO) treated with intravitreal ranibizumab plus DEX implant. All eyes underwent best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, log MAR), central foveal thickness (CFT), and intraocular pressure (IOP). In case of recurrence, each group received initial medication. RESULTS: At the 12-month visit, the mean log MAR BCVA that was improved from baseline was 0.23 with the IVR group and 0.30 with the IVR + DEX group. CFT decreased on average by 420 ± 292 μm with the IVR group and 393 ± 259 μm with the IVR + DEX implant group. No significant differences were detected in BCVA improvement and CFT reduction between the two groups (p > 0.05). The mean number of injections was 5.4 in the IVR group and 3.9 in the IVR + DEX implant group (p < 0.001). The mean reinjection interval for patients with the IVR + DEX implant was 131.2 ± 8.9 days (range: 98–150). The incidence of high IOP and cataract progression were significantly higher in the IVR + DEX implant group than in the IVR group (both p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In RVO-ME, the IVR + DEX implant did not have synergistic efficacy, providing further improvement in BCVA and a reduction in CFT. However, the IVR + DEX implant still had an advantage in reducing the number of injections and prolonging the time between injections. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9510371/ /pubmed/36172537 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.930508 Text en Copyright © 2022 Liang, Shen, Ou, An and Li. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Liang, Xuemei
Shen, Baiyun
Ou, Zuguo
An, Hongmei
Li, Li
Comparison of intravitreal ranibizumab monotherapy vs. ranibizumab combined with dexamethasone implant for macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion
title Comparison of intravitreal ranibizumab monotherapy vs. ranibizumab combined with dexamethasone implant for macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion
title_full Comparison of intravitreal ranibizumab monotherapy vs. ranibizumab combined with dexamethasone implant for macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion
title_fullStr Comparison of intravitreal ranibizumab monotherapy vs. ranibizumab combined with dexamethasone implant for macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of intravitreal ranibizumab monotherapy vs. ranibizumab combined with dexamethasone implant for macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion
title_short Comparison of intravitreal ranibizumab monotherapy vs. ranibizumab combined with dexamethasone implant for macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion
title_sort comparison of intravitreal ranibizumab monotherapy vs. ranibizumab combined with dexamethasone implant for macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9510371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36172537
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.930508
work_keys_str_mv AT liangxuemei comparisonofintravitrealranibizumabmonotherapyvsranibizumabcombinedwithdexamethasoneimplantformacularedemasecondarytoretinalveinocclusion
AT shenbaiyun comparisonofintravitrealranibizumabmonotherapyvsranibizumabcombinedwithdexamethasoneimplantformacularedemasecondarytoretinalveinocclusion
AT ouzuguo comparisonofintravitrealranibizumabmonotherapyvsranibizumabcombinedwithdexamethasoneimplantformacularedemasecondarytoretinalveinocclusion
AT anhongmei comparisonofintravitrealranibizumabmonotherapyvsranibizumabcombinedwithdexamethasoneimplantformacularedemasecondarytoretinalveinocclusion
AT lili comparisonofintravitrealranibizumabmonotherapyvsranibizumabcombinedwithdexamethasoneimplantformacularedemasecondarytoretinalveinocclusion