Cargando…
Using a dark logic model to explore adverse effects in audit and feedback: a qualitative study of gaming in colonoscopy
BACKGROUND: Audit and feedback (A&F) interventions improve patient care but may result in unintended consequences. To evaluate plausible harms and maximise benefits, theorisation using logic models can be useful. We aimed to explore the adverse effects of colonoscopy A&F using a feedback int...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9510430/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34893545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013588 |
_version_ | 1784797438975934464 |
---|---|
author | Catlow, Jamie Bhardwaj-Gosling, Rashmi Sharp, Linda Rutter, Matthew David Sniehotta, Falko F |
author_facet | Catlow, Jamie Bhardwaj-Gosling, Rashmi Sharp, Linda Rutter, Matthew David Sniehotta, Falko F |
author_sort | Catlow, Jamie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Audit and feedback (A&F) interventions improve patient care but may result in unintended consequences. To evaluate plausible harms and maximise benefits, theorisation using logic models can be useful. We aimed to explore the adverse effects of colonoscopy A&F using a feedback intervention theory (FIT) dark logic model before the National Endoscopy Database Automated Performance Reports to Improve Quality Outcomes Trial study. METHODS: We undertook a qualitative study exploring A&F practices in colonoscopy. Interviews were undertaken with endoscopists from six English National Health Service endoscopy centres, purposively sampled for professional background and experience. A thematic framework analysis was performed, mapping paradoxical effects and harms using FIT and the theory of planned behaviour. RESULTS: Data saturation was achieved on the 19th participant, with participants from nursing, surgical and medical backgrounds and a median of 7 years’ experience. When performance was below aspirational targets participants were falsely reassured by social comparisons. Participants described confidence as a requirement for colonoscopy. Negative feedback without a plan to improve risked reducing confidence and impeding performance (cognitive interference). Unmet targets increased anxiety and prompted participants to question messages’ motives and consider gaming. Participants described inaccurate documentation of subjective measures, including patient comfort, to achieve targets perceived as important. Participants described causing harm from persevering to complete procedures despite patient discomfort and removing insignificant polyps to improve detection rates without benefiting the patient. CONCLUSION: Our dark logic model highlighted that A&F interventions may create both desired and adverse effects. Without a priori theorisation evaluations may disregard potential harms. In colonoscopy, improved patient experience measures may reduce harm. To address cognitive interference the motivation of feedback to support improvement should always be clear, with plans targeting specific behaviours and offering face-to-face support for confidence. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN11126923. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9510430 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95104302022-09-27 Using a dark logic model to explore adverse effects in audit and feedback: a qualitative study of gaming in colonoscopy Catlow, Jamie Bhardwaj-Gosling, Rashmi Sharp, Linda Rutter, Matthew David Sniehotta, Falko F BMJ Qual Saf Original Research BACKGROUND: Audit and feedback (A&F) interventions improve patient care but may result in unintended consequences. To evaluate plausible harms and maximise benefits, theorisation using logic models can be useful. We aimed to explore the adverse effects of colonoscopy A&F using a feedback intervention theory (FIT) dark logic model before the National Endoscopy Database Automated Performance Reports to Improve Quality Outcomes Trial study. METHODS: We undertook a qualitative study exploring A&F practices in colonoscopy. Interviews were undertaken with endoscopists from six English National Health Service endoscopy centres, purposively sampled for professional background and experience. A thematic framework analysis was performed, mapping paradoxical effects and harms using FIT and the theory of planned behaviour. RESULTS: Data saturation was achieved on the 19th participant, with participants from nursing, surgical and medical backgrounds and a median of 7 years’ experience. When performance was below aspirational targets participants were falsely reassured by social comparisons. Participants described confidence as a requirement for colonoscopy. Negative feedback without a plan to improve risked reducing confidence and impeding performance (cognitive interference). Unmet targets increased anxiety and prompted participants to question messages’ motives and consider gaming. Participants described inaccurate documentation of subjective measures, including patient comfort, to achieve targets perceived as important. Participants described causing harm from persevering to complete procedures despite patient discomfort and removing insignificant polyps to improve detection rates without benefiting the patient. CONCLUSION: Our dark logic model highlighted that A&F interventions may create both desired and adverse effects. Without a priori theorisation evaluations may disregard potential harms. In colonoscopy, improved patient experience measures may reduce harm. To address cognitive interference the motivation of feedback to support improvement should always be clear, with plans targeting specific behaviours and offering face-to-face support for confidence. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN11126923. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-10 2021-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9510430/ /pubmed/34893545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013588 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Catlow, Jamie Bhardwaj-Gosling, Rashmi Sharp, Linda Rutter, Matthew David Sniehotta, Falko F Using a dark logic model to explore adverse effects in audit and feedback: a qualitative study of gaming in colonoscopy |
title | Using a dark logic model to explore adverse effects in audit and feedback: a qualitative study of gaming in colonoscopy |
title_full | Using a dark logic model to explore adverse effects in audit and feedback: a qualitative study of gaming in colonoscopy |
title_fullStr | Using a dark logic model to explore adverse effects in audit and feedback: a qualitative study of gaming in colonoscopy |
title_full_unstemmed | Using a dark logic model to explore adverse effects in audit and feedback: a qualitative study of gaming in colonoscopy |
title_short | Using a dark logic model to explore adverse effects in audit and feedback: a qualitative study of gaming in colonoscopy |
title_sort | using a dark logic model to explore adverse effects in audit and feedback: a qualitative study of gaming in colonoscopy |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9510430/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34893545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013588 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT catlowjamie usingadarklogicmodeltoexploreadverseeffectsinauditandfeedbackaqualitativestudyofgamingincolonoscopy AT bhardwajgoslingrashmi usingadarklogicmodeltoexploreadverseeffectsinauditandfeedbackaqualitativestudyofgamingincolonoscopy AT sharplinda usingadarklogicmodeltoexploreadverseeffectsinauditandfeedbackaqualitativestudyofgamingincolonoscopy AT ruttermatthewdavid usingadarklogicmodeltoexploreadverseeffectsinauditandfeedbackaqualitativestudyofgamingincolonoscopy AT sniehottafalkof usingadarklogicmodeltoexploreadverseeffectsinauditandfeedbackaqualitativestudyofgamingincolonoscopy |