Cargando…
Prospective sampling bias in COVID-19 recruitment methods: experimental evidence from a national randomized survey testing recruitment materials
BACKGROUND: In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, social science research has required recruiting many prospective participants. Many researchers have explicitly taken advantage of widespread public interest in COVID-19 to advertise their studies. Leveraging this interest, however, risks creating...
Autores principales: | Kennedy, Eric B., Charifson, Mia, Jehn, Megan, Jensen, Eric A., Vikse, Jenna |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9510455/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36162985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01726-2 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Bias Mitigation in Cardiothoracic Recruitment
por: Erkmen, Cherie Parungo, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Sample selection, recruitment and participation rates in health examination surveys in Europe – experience from seven national surveys
por: Mindell, Jennifer S., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Comparison of study samples recruited with virtual versus traditional recruitment methods
por: Moseson, Heidi, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
The impact of non-response bias due to sampling in public health studies: A comparison of voluntary versus mandatory recruitment in a Dutch national survey on adolescent health
por: Cheung, Kei Long, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Recruitment via social media: advantages and potential biases
por: Benedict, Catherine, et al.
Publicado: (2019)