Cargando…

The German Arthroscopy Registry DART: what has happened after 5 years?

PURPOSE: The German Arthroscopy Registry (DART) has been initiated in 2017 with the aim to collect real-life data of patients undergoing knee, shoulder, hip or ankle surgery. The purpose of this study was to present an overview of the current status and the collected data thus far. METHODS: Data ent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hinz, Maximilian, Lutter, Christoph, Mueller-Rath, Ralf, Niemeyer, Philipp, Miltner, Oliver, Tischer, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9510517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36153780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-07152-7
_version_ 1784797453719961600
author Hinz, Maximilian
Lutter, Christoph
Mueller-Rath, Ralf
Niemeyer, Philipp
Miltner, Oliver
Tischer, Thomas
author_facet Hinz, Maximilian
Lutter, Christoph
Mueller-Rath, Ralf
Niemeyer, Philipp
Miltner, Oliver
Tischer, Thomas
author_sort Hinz, Maximilian
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The German Arthroscopy Registry (DART) has been initiated in 2017 with the aim to collect real-life data of patients undergoing knee, shoulder, hip or ankle surgery. The purpose of this study was to present an overview of the current status and the collected data thus far. METHODS: Data entered between 11/2017 and 01/2022 were analyzed. The number of cases (each case is defined as a single operation with or without concomitant procedures) entered for each joint, follow-up rates and trends between different age groups (18–29 years, 30–44 years, 45–64 years,  ≥ 65 years) and across genders, and quality of life improvement (pre- vs. 1 year postoperative EQ visual analogue scale [EQ-VAS]) for frequently performed procedures (medial meniscus repair [MMR] vs. rotator cuff repair [RCR] vs. microfracturing of the talus [MFX-T]) were investigated. RESULTS: Overall, 6651 cases were entered into DART, forming three distinct modules classified by joint (5370 knee, 1053 shoulder and 228 ankle cases). The most commonly entered procedures were: knee: partial medial meniscectomy (n = 2089), chondroplasty (n = 1389), anterior cruicate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autograft (n = 880); shoulder: sub acromial decompression (n = 631), bursectomy (n = 385), RCR (n = 359); ankle: partial synovectomy (n = 117), tibial osteophyte resection (n = 72), loose body removal (n = 48). In the knee and shoulder modules, middle-aged patients were the predominant age group, whereas in the ankle module, the youngest age group was the most frequent one. The two oldest age groups had the highest 1-year follow-up rates across all modules. In the knee and shoulder module, 1-year follow-up rates were higher in female patients, whereas follow-up rates were higher in male patients in the ankle module. From pre- to 1-year postoperative, MFX-T (EQ-VAS: 50.0 [25–75% interquartile range: 31.8–71.5] to 75.0 [54.3–84.3]; ∆ + 25.0) led to a comparably larger improvement in quality of life than did MMR (EQ-VAS: 70.0 [50.0–80.0] to 85.0 [70.0–94.0]; ∆ + 15.0) or RCR (EQ-VAS: 67.0 [50.0–80.0] to 85.0 [70.0–95.0]; ∆ + 18.0). CONCLUSION: DART has been sufficiently established and collects high-quality patient-related data with satisfactory follow-up allowing for a comprehensive analysis of the collected data. The current focus lies on improving patient enrolment and follow-up rates as well as initiating the hip module.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9510517
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95105172022-09-26 The German Arthroscopy Registry DART: what has happened after 5 years? Hinz, Maximilian Lutter, Christoph Mueller-Rath, Ralf Niemeyer, Philipp Miltner, Oliver Tischer, Thomas Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Sports Traumatology PURPOSE: The German Arthroscopy Registry (DART) has been initiated in 2017 with the aim to collect real-life data of patients undergoing knee, shoulder, hip or ankle surgery. The purpose of this study was to present an overview of the current status and the collected data thus far. METHODS: Data entered between 11/2017 and 01/2022 were analyzed. The number of cases (each case is defined as a single operation with or without concomitant procedures) entered for each joint, follow-up rates and trends between different age groups (18–29 years, 30–44 years, 45–64 years,  ≥ 65 years) and across genders, and quality of life improvement (pre- vs. 1 year postoperative EQ visual analogue scale [EQ-VAS]) for frequently performed procedures (medial meniscus repair [MMR] vs. rotator cuff repair [RCR] vs. microfracturing of the talus [MFX-T]) were investigated. RESULTS: Overall, 6651 cases were entered into DART, forming three distinct modules classified by joint (5370 knee, 1053 shoulder and 228 ankle cases). The most commonly entered procedures were: knee: partial medial meniscectomy (n = 2089), chondroplasty (n = 1389), anterior cruicate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autograft (n = 880); shoulder: sub acromial decompression (n = 631), bursectomy (n = 385), RCR (n = 359); ankle: partial synovectomy (n = 117), tibial osteophyte resection (n = 72), loose body removal (n = 48). In the knee and shoulder modules, middle-aged patients were the predominant age group, whereas in the ankle module, the youngest age group was the most frequent one. The two oldest age groups had the highest 1-year follow-up rates across all modules. In the knee and shoulder module, 1-year follow-up rates were higher in female patients, whereas follow-up rates were higher in male patients in the ankle module. From pre- to 1-year postoperative, MFX-T (EQ-VAS: 50.0 [25–75% interquartile range: 31.8–71.5] to 75.0 [54.3–84.3]; ∆ + 25.0) led to a comparably larger improvement in quality of life than did MMR (EQ-VAS: 70.0 [50.0–80.0] to 85.0 [70.0–94.0]; ∆ + 15.0) or RCR (EQ-VAS: 67.0 [50.0–80.0] to 85.0 [70.0–95.0]; ∆ + 18.0). CONCLUSION: DART has been sufficiently established and collects high-quality patient-related data with satisfactory follow-up allowing for a comprehensive analysis of the collected data. The current focus lies on improving patient enrolment and follow-up rates as well as initiating the hip module. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-09-25 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9510517/ /pubmed/36153780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-07152-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Sports Traumatology
Hinz, Maximilian
Lutter, Christoph
Mueller-Rath, Ralf
Niemeyer, Philipp
Miltner, Oliver
Tischer, Thomas
The German Arthroscopy Registry DART: what has happened after 5 years?
title The German Arthroscopy Registry DART: what has happened after 5 years?
title_full The German Arthroscopy Registry DART: what has happened after 5 years?
title_fullStr The German Arthroscopy Registry DART: what has happened after 5 years?
title_full_unstemmed The German Arthroscopy Registry DART: what has happened after 5 years?
title_short The German Arthroscopy Registry DART: what has happened after 5 years?
title_sort german arthroscopy registry dart: what has happened after 5 years?
topic Sports Traumatology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9510517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36153780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-07152-7
work_keys_str_mv AT hinzmaximilian thegermanarthroscopyregistrydartwhathashappenedafter5years
AT lutterchristoph thegermanarthroscopyregistrydartwhathashappenedafter5years
AT muellerrathralf thegermanarthroscopyregistrydartwhathashappenedafter5years
AT niemeyerphilipp thegermanarthroscopyregistrydartwhathashappenedafter5years
AT miltneroliver thegermanarthroscopyregistrydartwhathashappenedafter5years
AT tischerthomas thegermanarthroscopyregistrydartwhathashappenedafter5years
AT hinzmaximilian germanarthroscopyregistrydartwhathashappenedafter5years
AT lutterchristoph germanarthroscopyregistrydartwhathashappenedafter5years
AT muellerrathralf germanarthroscopyregistrydartwhathashappenedafter5years
AT niemeyerphilipp germanarthroscopyregistrydartwhathashappenedafter5years
AT miltneroliver germanarthroscopyregistrydartwhathashappenedafter5years
AT tischerthomas germanarthroscopyregistrydartwhathashappenedafter5years