Cargando…
The methodologies to assess the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions during COVID-19: a systematic review
Non-pharmaceutical interventions, such as school closures and stay-at-home orders, have been implemented around the world to control the spread of SARS-CoV-2. Their effectiveness in improving health-related outcomes has been the subject of numerous empirical studies. However, these studies show fair...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9510554/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36152133 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10654-022-00908-y |
_version_ | 1784797460899561472 |
---|---|
author | Banholzer, Nicolas Lison, Adrian Özcelik, Dennis Stadler, Tanja Feuerriegel, Stefan Vach, Werner |
author_facet | Banholzer, Nicolas Lison, Adrian Özcelik, Dennis Stadler, Tanja Feuerriegel, Stefan Vach, Werner |
author_sort | Banholzer, Nicolas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Non-pharmaceutical interventions, such as school closures and stay-at-home orders, have been implemented around the world to control the spread of SARS-CoV-2. Their effectiveness in improving health-related outcomes has been the subject of numerous empirical studies. However, these studies show fairly large variation among methodologies in use, reflecting the absence of an established methodological framework. On the one hand, variation in methodologies may be desirable to assess the robustness of results; on the other hand, a lack of common standards can impede comparability among studies. To establish a comprehensive overview over the methodologies in use, we conducted a systematic review of studies assessing the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions between January 1, 2020 and January 12, 2021 (n = 248). We identified substantial variation in methodologies with respect to study setting, outcome, intervention, methodological approach, and effectiveness assessment. On this basis, we point to shortcomings of existing studies and make recommendations for the design of future studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10654-022-00908-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9510554 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95105542022-09-26 The methodologies to assess the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions during COVID-19: a systematic review Banholzer, Nicolas Lison, Adrian Özcelik, Dennis Stadler, Tanja Feuerriegel, Stefan Vach, Werner Eur J Epidemiol Review Non-pharmaceutical interventions, such as school closures and stay-at-home orders, have been implemented around the world to control the spread of SARS-CoV-2. Their effectiveness in improving health-related outcomes has been the subject of numerous empirical studies. However, these studies show fairly large variation among methodologies in use, reflecting the absence of an established methodological framework. On the one hand, variation in methodologies may be desirable to assess the robustness of results; on the other hand, a lack of common standards can impede comparability among studies. To establish a comprehensive overview over the methodologies in use, we conducted a systematic review of studies assessing the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions between January 1, 2020 and January 12, 2021 (n = 248). We identified substantial variation in methodologies with respect to study setting, outcome, intervention, methodological approach, and effectiveness assessment. On this basis, we point to shortcomings of existing studies and make recommendations for the design of future studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10654-022-00908-y. Springer Netherlands 2022-09-24 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9510554/ /pubmed/36152133 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10654-022-00908-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Banholzer, Nicolas Lison, Adrian Özcelik, Dennis Stadler, Tanja Feuerriegel, Stefan Vach, Werner The methodologies to assess the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions during COVID-19: a systematic review |
title | The methodologies to assess the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions during COVID-19: a systematic review |
title_full | The methodologies to assess the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions during COVID-19: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | The methodologies to assess the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions during COVID-19: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | The methodologies to assess the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions during COVID-19: a systematic review |
title_short | The methodologies to assess the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions during COVID-19: a systematic review |
title_sort | methodologies to assess the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions during covid-19: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9510554/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36152133 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10654-022-00908-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT banholzernicolas themethodologiestoassesstheeffectivenessofnonpharmaceuticalinterventionsduringcovid19asystematicreview AT lisonadrian themethodologiestoassesstheeffectivenessofnonpharmaceuticalinterventionsduringcovid19asystematicreview AT ozcelikdennis themethodologiestoassesstheeffectivenessofnonpharmaceuticalinterventionsduringcovid19asystematicreview AT stadlertanja themethodologiestoassesstheeffectivenessofnonpharmaceuticalinterventionsduringcovid19asystematicreview AT feuerriegelstefan themethodologiestoassesstheeffectivenessofnonpharmaceuticalinterventionsduringcovid19asystematicreview AT vachwerner themethodologiestoassesstheeffectivenessofnonpharmaceuticalinterventionsduringcovid19asystematicreview AT banholzernicolas methodologiestoassesstheeffectivenessofnonpharmaceuticalinterventionsduringcovid19asystematicreview AT lisonadrian methodologiestoassesstheeffectivenessofnonpharmaceuticalinterventionsduringcovid19asystematicreview AT ozcelikdennis methodologiestoassesstheeffectivenessofnonpharmaceuticalinterventionsduringcovid19asystematicreview AT stadlertanja methodologiestoassesstheeffectivenessofnonpharmaceuticalinterventionsduringcovid19asystematicreview AT feuerriegelstefan methodologiestoassesstheeffectivenessofnonpharmaceuticalinterventionsduringcovid19asystematicreview AT vachwerner methodologiestoassesstheeffectivenessofnonpharmaceuticalinterventionsduringcovid19asystematicreview |