Cargando…

Comparing three wearable accelerometers to measure early activity after cardiac surgery

OBJECTIVE: Wearable activity monitors can provide detailed data on activity after cardiac surgery and discriminate a patient's risk for hospital-based outcomes. However, comparative data for different monitoring approaches, as well as predictive ability over clinical characteristics, are lackin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brown, Charles H., Yanek, Lisa, Healy, Ryan, Tsay, Tiffany, Di, Junrui, Goeddel, Lee, Young, Daniel, Zipunnikov, Vadim, Schrack, Jennifer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9510817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36172447
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjon.2022.05.011
_version_ 1784797524727431168
author Brown, Charles H.
Yanek, Lisa
Healy, Ryan
Tsay, Tiffany
Di, Junrui
Goeddel, Lee
Young, Daniel
Zipunnikov, Vadim
Schrack, Jennifer
author_facet Brown, Charles H.
Yanek, Lisa
Healy, Ryan
Tsay, Tiffany
Di, Junrui
Goeddel, Lee
Young, Daniel
Zipunnikov, Vadim
Schrack, Jennifer
author_sort Brown, Charles H.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Wearable activity monitors can provide detailed data on activity after cardiac surgery and discriminate a patient's risk for hospital-based outcomes. However, comparative data for different monitoring approaches, as well as predictive ability over clinical characteristics, are lacking. In addition, data on specific thresholds of activity are needed. The objective of this study was to compare 3 wearable activity monitors and 1 observational mobility scale in discriminating risk for 3 hospital-based outcomes, and to establish clinically relevant step thresholds. METHODS: Cardiac surgery patients were enrolled between June 2016 and August 2017 in a cohort study. Postoperative activity was measured by 3 accelerometry monitors (StepWatch Ambulation Monitor, Fitbit Charge HR, and ActiGraph GT9X) and 1 nurse-based observation scale. Monitors represent a spectrum of characteristics, including wear location (ankle/wrist), output (activity counts/steps), consumer accessibility, and cost. Primary outcomes were duration of hospitalization >7 days, discharge to a nonhome location, and 30-day readmission. RESULTS: Data were available from 193 patients (median age 67 years [interquartile range, 58-72]). All postoperative day 2 activity metrics (ie, from StepWatch, Fitbit, ActiGraph, and the observation scale) were independently associated with prolonged hospitalization and discharge to a nonhome location. Only steps as measured by StepWatch was independently associated with 30-day readmission. Overall, StepWatch provided the greatest discrimination (C-statistics 0.71-0.76 for all outcomes). Step thresholds between 250 and 500 steps/day identified between 74% and 96% of patients with any primary outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Data from wearable accelerometers provide additive value in early postoperative risk-stratification for hospital-based outcomes. These results both support and provide guidance for activity-monitoring programs after cardiac surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9510817
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95108172022-09-27 Comparing three wearable accelerometers to measure early activity after cardiac surgery Brown, Charles H. Yanek, Lisa Healy, Ryan Tsay, Tiffany Di, Junrui Goeddel, Lee Young, Daniel Zipunnikov, Vadim Schrack, Jennifer JTCVS Open Adult: Perioperative Management OBJECTIVE: Wearable activity monitors can provide detailed data on activity after cardiac surgery and discriminate a patient's risk for hospital-based outcomes. However, comparative data for different monitoring approaches, as well as predictive ability over clinical characteristics, are lacking. In addition, data on specific thresholds of activity are needed. The objective of this study was to compare 3 wearable activity monitors and 1 observational mobility scale in discriminating risk for 3 hospital-based outcomes, and to establish clinically relevant step thresholds. METHODS: Cardiac surgery patients were enrolled between June 2016 and August 2017 in a cohort study. Postoperative activity was measured by 3 accelerometry monitors (StepWatch Ambulation Monitor, Fitbit Charge HR, and ActiGraph GT9X) and 1 nurse-based observation scale. Monitors represent a spectrum of characteristics, including wear location (ankle/wrist), output (activity counts/steps), consumer accessibility, and cost. Primary outcomes were duration of hospitalization >7 days, discharge to a nonhome location, and 30-day readmission. RESULTS: Data were available from 193 patients (median age 67 years [interquartile range, 58-72]). All postoperative day 2 activity metrics (ie, from StepWatch, Fitbit, ActiGraph, and the observation scale) were independently associated with prolonged hospitalization and discharge to a nonhome location. Only steps as measured by StepWatch was independently associated with 30-day readmission. Overall, StepWatch provided the greatest discrimination (C-statistics 0.71-0.76 for all outcomes). Step thresholds between 250 and 500 steps/day identified between 74% and 96% of patients with any primary outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Data from wearable accelerometers provide additive value in early postoperative risk-stratification for hospital-based outcomes. These results both support and provide guidance for activity-monitoring programs after cardiac surgery. Elsevier 2022-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9510817/ /pubmed/36172447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjon.2022.05.011 Text en © 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Adult: Perioperative Management
Brown, Charles H.
Yanek, Lisa
Healy, Ryan
Tsay, Tiffany
Di, Junrui
Goeddel, Lee
Young, Daniel
Zipunnikov, Vadim
Schrack, Jennifer
Comparing three wearable accelerometers to measure early activity after cardiac surgery
title Comparing three wearable accelerometers to measure early activity after cardiac surgery
title_full Comparing three wearable accelerometers to measure early activity after cardiac surgery
title_fullStr Comparing three wearable accelerometers to measure early activity after cardiac surgery
title_full_unstemmed Comparing three wearable accelerometers to measure early activity after cardiac surgery
title_short Comparing three wearable accelerometers to measure early activity after cardiac surgery
title_sort comparing three wearable accelerometers to measure early activity after cardiac surgery
topic Adult: Perioperative Management
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9510817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36172447
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjon.2022.05.011
work_keys_str_mv AT browncharlesh comparingthreewearableaccelerometerstomeasureearlyactivityaftercardiacsurgery
AT yaneklisa comparingthreewearableaccelerometerstomeasureearlyactivityaftercardiacsurgery
AT healyryan comparingthreewearableaccelerometerstomeasureearlyactivityaftercardiacsurgery
AT tsaytiffany comparingthreewearableaccelerometerstomeasureearlyactivityaftercardiacsurgery
AT dijunrui comparingthreewearableaccelerometerstomeasureearlyactivityaftercardiacsurgery
AT goeddellee comparingthreewearableaccelerometerstomeasureearlyactivityaftercardiacsurgery
AT youngdaniel comparingthreewearableaccelerometerstomeasureearlyactivityaftercardiacsurgery
AT zipunnikovvadim comparingthreewearableaccelerometerstomeasureearlyactivityaftercardiacsurgery
AT schrackjennifer comparingthreewearableaccelerometerstomeasureearlyactivityaftercardiacsurgery
AT comparingthreewearableaccelerometerstomeasureearlyactivityaftercardiacsurgery