Cargando…
Multicenter retrospective evaluation of transmural migration of subcutaneous ureteral bypass devices within the digestive tract in cats
BACKGROUND: Placement of a subcutaneous ureteral bypass (SUB) device is an effective method to relieve all causes of ureteral obstruction in cats. Complications involving migration within the gastrointestinal tract have been seldomly described. OBJECTIVES: To characterize transmural migration of SUB...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9511080/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35976072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.16511 |
_version_ | 1784797584350511104 |
---|---|
author | Véran, Emilie Vachon, Catherine Byron, Julie Howard, James Berent, Allyson Weisse, Chick Javard, Romain Spencer, Ashley Gradilla, Sarah Palm, Carrie Culp, William Cléroux, Andréanne Dunn, Marilyn |
author_facet | Véran, Emilie Vachon, Catherine Byron, Julie Howard, James Berent, Allyson Weisse, Chick Javard, Romain Spencer, Ashley Gradilla, Sarah Palm, Carrie Culp, William Cléroux, Andréanne Dunn, Marilyn |
author_sort | Véran, Emilie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Placement of a subcutaneous ureteral bypass (SUB) device is an effective method to relieve all causes of ureteral obstruction in cats. Complications involving migration within the gastrointestinal tract have been seldomly described. OBJECTIVES: To characterize transmural migration of SUB devices within the digestive tract in cats. ANIMALS: Eleven migrated SUB catheters identified in 8 cats between 2017 and 2021. METHODS: Retrospective review of medical records of cats with a SUB device in which migration into the gastrointestinal tract was identified. RESULTS: The median time from SUB device placement to implant migration was 928 days (201‐2298 days). Seven cats had obstruction of the SUB device and a positive urine culture at diagnosis. The migration was identified by ultrasound in 6/11, pre‐operative contrast radiography in 2/2, and only at time of surgery in 3 SUB devices. All cats underwent surgical correction. Four nephrostomy and 7 cystotomy catheters migrated. Migration occurred into the duodenum (3/11), jejunum (7/11), and colon (1/11). SUB devices were removed in 7 cats and replaced in 2 cats, with 1 cat diagnosed with 2 migration events. Gastrointestinal resection and anastomosis were performed in 7/8 cats and an enterotomy in 2 cats. Six cats survived to discharge. The median follow‐up time after migration diagnosis was 365 days (range, 0‐1114 days) and 2 cats are still alive. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Although a rare complication, migration of SUB device should be considered in cats with SUB device obstruction and a positive urine culture. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9511080 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95110802022-09-30 Multicenter retrospective evaluation of transmural migration of subcutaneous ureteral bypass devices within the digestive tract in cats Véran, Emilie Vachon, Catherine Byron, Julie Howard, James Berent, Allyson Weisse, Chick Javard, Romain Spencer, Ashley Gradilla, Sarah Palm, Carrie Culp, William Cléroux, Andréanne Dunn, Marilyn J Vet Intern Med SMALL ANIMAL BACKGROUND: Placement of a subcutaneous ureteral bypass (SUB) device is an effective method to relieve all causes of ureteral obstruction in cats. Complications involving migration within the gastrointestinal tract have been seldomly described. OBJECTIVES: To characterize transmural migration of SUB devices within the digestive tract in cats. ANIMALS: Eleven migrated SUB catheters identified in 8 cats between 2017 and 2021. METHODS: Retrospective review of medical records of cats with a SUB device in which migration into the gastrointestinal tract was identified. RESULTS: The median time from SUB device placement to implant migration was 928 days (201‐2298 days). Seven cats had obstruction of the SUB device and a positive urine culture at diagnosis. The migration was identified by ultrasound in 6/11, pre‐operative contrast radiography in 2/2, and only at time of surgery in 3 SUB devices. All cats underwent surgical correction. Four nephrostomy and 7 cystotomy catheters migrated. Migration occurred into the duodenum (3/11), jejunum (7/11), and colon (1/11). SUB devices were removed in 7 cats and replaced in 2 cats, with 1 cat diagnosed with 2 migration events. Gastrointestinal resection and anastomosis were performed in 7/8 cats and an enterotomy in 2 cats. Six cats survived to discharge. The median follow‐up time after migration diagnosis was 365 days (range, 0‐1114 days) and 2 cats are still alive. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Although a rare complication, migration of SUB device should be considered in cats with SUB device obstruction and a positive urine culture. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-08-17 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9511080/ /pubmed/35976072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.16511 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | SMALL ANIMAL Véran, Emilie Vachon, Catherine Byron, Julie Howard, James Berent, Allyson Weisse, Chick Javard, Romain Spencer, Ashley Gradilla, Sarah Palm, Carrie Culp, William Cléroux, Andréanne Dunn, Marilyn Multicenter retrospective evaluation of transmural migration of subcutaneous ureteral bypass devices within the digestive tract in cats |
title | Multicenter retrospective evaluation of transmural migration of subcutaneous ureteral bypass devices within the digestive tract in cats |
title_full | Multicenter retrospective evaluation of transmural migration of subcutaneous ureteral bypass devices within the digestive tract in cats |
title_fullStr | Multicenter retrospective evaluation of transmural migration of subcutaneous ureteral bypass devices within the digestive tract in cats |
title_full_unstemmed | Multicenter retrospective evaluation of transmural migration of subcutaneous ureteral bypass devices within the digestive tract in cats |
title_short | Multicenter retrospective evaluation of transmural migration of subcutaneous ureteral bypass devices within the digestive tract in cats |
title_sort | multicenter retrospective evaluation of transmural migration of subcutaneous ureteral bypass devices within the digestive tract in cats |
topic | SMALL ANIMAL |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9511080/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35976072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.16511 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT veranemilie multicenterretrospectiveevaluationoftransmuralmigrationofsubcutaneousureteralbypassdeviceswithinthedigestivetractincats AT vachoncatherine multicenterretrospectiveevaluationoftransmuralmigrationofsubcutaneousureteralbypassdeviceswithinthedigestivetractincats AT byronjulie multicenterretrospectiveevaluationoftransmuralmigrationofsubcutaneousureteralbypassdeviceswithinthedigestivetractincats AT howardjames multicenterretrospectiveevaluationoftransmuralmigrationofsubcutaneousureteralbypassdeviceswithinthedigestivetractincats AT berentallyson multicenterretrospectiveevaluationoftransmuralmigrationofsubcutaneousureteralbypassdeviceswithinthedigestivetractincats AT weissechick multicenterretrospectiveevaluationoftransmuralmigrationofsubcutaneousureteralbypassdeviceswithinthedigestivetractincats AT javardromain multicenterretrospectiveevaluationoftransmuralmigrationofsubcutaneousureteralbypassdeviceswithinthedigestivetractincats AT spencerashley multicenterretrospectiveevaluationoftransmuralmigrationofsubcutaneousureteralbypassdeviceswithinthedigestivetractincats AT gradillasarah multicenterretrospectiveevaluationoftransmuralmigrationofsubcutaneousureteralbypassdeviceswithinthedigestivetractincats AT palmcarrie multicenterretrospectiveevaluationoftransmuralmigrationofsubcutaneousureteralbypassdeviceswithinthedigestivetractincats AT culpwilliam multicenterretrospectiveevaluationoftransmuralmigrationofsubcutaneousureteralbypassdeviceswithinthedigestivetractincats AT clerouxandreanne multicenterretrospectiveevaluationoftransmuralmigrationofsubcutaneousureteralbypassdeviceswithinthedigestivetractincats AT dunnmarilyn multicenterretrospectiveevaluationoftransmuralmigrationofsubcutaneousureteralbypassdeviceswithinthedigestivetractincats |