Cargando…

The impact of seat height on 1-min sit-to-stand test performance in COPD: a randomised crossover trial

STUDY QUESTION: Is there a difference in the number of repetitions in the 1-minute sit-to-stand (1MSTS) test using an individually adapted seat height to 90° knee flexion (1MSTS(IND)), compared with the commonly used standard chair seat height of 46 cm (1MSTS(STD)), in people with COPD? METHODS: We...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zumbrunnen, Valerie, Riegler, Thomas F., Haile, Sarah R., Radtke, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Respiratory Society 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9511143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36171989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00033-2022
_version_ 1784797598995972096
author Zumbrunnen, Valerie
Riegler, Thomas F.
Haile, Sarah R.
Radtke, Thomas
author_facet Zumbrunnen, Valerie
Riegler, Thomas F.
Haile, Sarah R.
Radtke, Thomas
author_sort Zumbrunnen, Valerie
collection PubMed
description STUDY QUESTION: Is there a difference in the number of repetitions in the 1-minute sit-to-stand (1MSTS) test using an individually adapted seat height to 90° knee flexion (1MSTS(IND)), compared with the commonly used standard chair seat height of 46 cm (1MSTS(STD)), in people with COPD? METHODS: We conducted a single-centre, single-blinded, randomised crossover trial in people with COPD between August 2020 and March 2021 at a specialised rehabilitation clinic in Switzerland. After a learning 1MSTS test, all participants performed two 1MSTS tests in random order on consecutive days. Participants were blinded, as they did not receive detailed information on the testing protocols. RESULTS: 49 individuals with COPD (47% female) participated. In a regression model adjusted for sequence period and subject, 1MSTS test performance was lower on 1MSTS(IND) compared to 1MSTS(STD) (−0.78 repetitions, 95% CI −1.47 to −0.11). In a second regression model additionally including the knee angle and an interaction term (1MSTS(IND)×knee angle), the interaction term was significant: 0.18 (95% CI 0.05 to 0.30). The limits of agreement were between −5.5 and 4 repetitions. CONCLUSION: Although we observed a statistically significant difference between 1MSTS(IND) and 1MSTS(STD) on a population level, the difference is negligible. Further studies may be needed to determine whether individual adaptation of seat height is needed for very tall or short people to ensure a valid assessment of 1MSTS test performance in COPD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9511143
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher European Respiratory Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95111432022-09-27 The impact of seat height on 1-min sit-to-stand test performance in COPD: a randomised crossover trial Zumbrunnen, Valerie Riegler, Thomas F. Haile, Sarah R. Radtke, Thomas ERJ Open Res Original Research Articles STUDY QUESTION: Is there a difference in the number of repetitions in the 1-minute sit-to-stand (1MSTS) test using an individually adapted seat height to 90° knee flexion (1MSTS(IND)), compared with the commonly used standard chair seat height of 46 cm (1MSTS(STD)), in people with COPD? METHODS: We conducted a single-centre, single-blinded, randomised crossover trial in people with COPD between August 2020 and March 2021 at a specialised rehabilitation clinic in Switzerland. After a learning 1MSTS test, all participants performed two 1MSTS tests in random order on consecutive days. Participants were blinded, as they did not receive detailed information on the testing protocols. RESULTS: 49 individuals with COPD (47% female) participated. In a regression model adjusted for sequence period and subject, 1MSTS test performance was lower on 1MSTS(IND) compared to 1MSTS(STD) (−0.78 repetitions, 95% CI −1.47 to −0.11). In a second regression model additionally including the knee angle and an interaction term (1MSTS(IND)×knee angle), the interaction term was significant: 0.18 (95% CI 0.05 to 0.30). The limits of agreement were between −5.5 and 4 repetitions. CONCLUSION: Although we observed a statistically significant difference between 1MSTS(IND) and 1MSTS(STD) on a population level, the difference is negligible. Further studies may be needed to determine whether individual adaptation of seat height is needed for very tall or short people to ensure a valid assessment of 1MSTS test performance in COPD. European Respiratory Society 2022-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9511143/ /pubmed/36171989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00033-2022 Text en Copyright ©The authors 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org (mailto:permissions@ersnet.org)
spellingShingle Original Research Articles
Zumbrunnen, Valerie
Riegler, Thomas F.
Haile, Sarah R.
Radtke, Thomas
The impact of seat height on 1-min sit-to-stand test performance in COPD: a randomised crossover trial
title The impact of seat height on 1-min sit-to-stand test performance in COPD: a randomised crossover trial
title_full The impact of seat height on 1-min sit-to-stand test performance in COPD: a randomised crossover trial
title_fullStr The impact of seat height on 1-min sit-to-stand test performance in COPD: a randomised crossover trial
title_full_unstemmed The impact of seat height on 1-min sit-to-stand test performance in COPD: a randomised crossover trial
title_short The impact of seat height on 1-min sit-to-stand test performance in COPD: a randomised crossover trial
title_sort impact of seat height on 1-min sit-to-stand test performance in copd: a randomised crossover trial
topic Original Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9511143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36171989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00033-2022
work_keys_str_mv AT zumbrunnenvalerie theimpactofseatheighton1minsittostandtestperformanceincopdarandomisedcrossovertrial
AT rieglerthomasf theimpactofseatheighton1minsittostandtestperformanceincopdarandomisedcrossovertrial
AT hailesarahr theimpactofseatheighton1minsittostandtestperformanceincopdarandomisedcrossovertrial
AT radtkethomas theimpactofseatheighton1minsittostandtestperformanceincopdarandomisedcrossovertrial
AT zumbrunnenvalerie impactofseatheighton1minsittostandtestperformanceincopdarandomisedcrossovertrial
AT rieglerthomasf impactofseatheighton1minsittostandtestperformanceincopdarandomisedcrossovertrial
AT hailesarahr impactofseatheighton1minsittostandtestperformanceincopdarandomisedcrossovertrial
AT radtkethomas impactofseatheighton1minsittostandtestperformanceincopdarandomisedcrossovertrial