Cargando…
Alberta Rating Index for Apps: Study of Reliability and Validity
Background. The number of mobile health applications is rapidly increasing, yet no reliable tool exists for occupational therapists and their clients to rate the quality of these apps. Purpose. To develop the Alberta Rating Index for Apps (ARIA). Methods. Through a sequential design in three phases,...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9511245/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35294312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00084174221085451 |
_version_ | 1784797621085274112 |
---|---|
author | Azad-Khaneghah, Peyman Roduta Roberts, Mary Liu, Lili |
author_facet | Azad-Khaneghah, Peyman Roduta Roberts, Mary Liu, Lili |
author_sort | Azad-Khaneghah, Peyman |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. The number of mobile health applications is rapidly increasing, yet no reliable tool exists for occupational therapists and their clients to rate the quality of these apps. Purpose. To develop the Alberta Rating Index for Apps (ARIA). Methods. Through a sequential design in three phases, we developed a rating index for mobile health applications and examined its reliability and validity with 10 participants. Findings. The coefficients of reliability were 0.95 for occupational therapists, 0.60 for older adults, and 0.88 for adults with a mental health condition. ARIA's correlation with another scale used in app review studies, U-MARS, was low to moderate. Implications. ARIA showed a high inter-rater reliability in two of the three user groups. ARIA is comprehensive and includes criteria not captured by U-MARS, such as privacy and security. Further studies are warranted with diverse raters and health apps. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9511245 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95112452022-09-27 Alberta Rating Index for Apps: Study of Reliability and Validity Azad-Khaneghah, Peyman Roduta Roberts, Mary Liu, Lili Can J Occup Ther Original Articles / Articles originaux Background. The number of mobile health applications is rapidly increasing, yet no reliable tool exists for occupational therapists and their clients to rate the quality of these apps. Purpose. To develop the Alberta Rating Index for Apps (ARIA). Methods. Through a sequential design in three phases, we developed a rating index for mobile health applications and examined its reliability and validity with 10 participants. Findings. The coefficients of reliability were 0.95 for occupational therapists, 0.60 for older adults, and 0.88 for adults with a mental health condition. ARIA's correlation with another scale used in app review studies, U-MARS, was low to moderate. Implications. ARIA showed a high inter-rater reliability in two of the three user groups. ARIA is comprehensive and includes criteria not captured by U-MARS, such as privacy and security. Further studies are warranted with diverse raters and health apps. SAGE Publications 2022-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9511245/ /pubmed/35294312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00084174221085451 Text en © CAOT 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles / Articles originaux Azad-Khaneghah, Peyman Roduta Roberts, Mary Liu, Lili Alberta Rating Index for Apps: Study of Reliability and Validity |
title | Alberta Rating Index for Apps: Study of Reliability and Validity |
title_full | Alberta Rating Index for Apps: Study of Reliability and Validity |
title_fullStr | Alberta Rating Index for Apps: Study of Reliability and Validity |
title_full_unstemmed | Alberta Rating Index for Apps: Study of Reliability and Validity |
title_short | Alberta Rating Index for Apps: Study of Reliability and Validity |
title_sort | alberta rating index for apps: study of reliability and validity |
topic | Original Articles / Articles originaux |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9511245/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35294312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00084174221085451 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT azadkhaneghahpeyman albertaratingindexforappsstudyofreliabilityandvalidity AT rodutarobertsmary albertaratingindexforappsstudyofreliabilityandvalidity AT liulili albertaratingindexforappsstudyofreliabilityandvalidity |