Cargando…

Optimal Treatments for NSCLC Patients Harboring Primary or Acquired MET Amplification

Background: In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring MET mutations, MET-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been proven to achieve a good response. However, the relative efficacy of different therapeutics in primary NSCLC patients with MET amplification and the treatment options f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Dantong, Tao, Junyan, Yan, Weihua, Zhu, Jingjuan, Zhou, Hai, Sheng, Yingying, Xue, Chaofan, Li, Hong, Hou, Helei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9511535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36148917
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338221128414
_version_ 1784797661627416576
author Sun, Dantong
Tao, Junyan
Yan, Weihua
Zhu, Jingjuan
Zhou, Hai
Sheng, Yingying
Xue, Chaofan
Li, Hong
Hou, Helei
author_facet Sun, Dantong
Tao, Junyan
Yan, Weihua
Zhu, Jingjuan
Zhou, Hai
Sheng, Yingying
Xue, Chaofan
Li, Hong
Hou, Helei
author_sort Sun, Dantong
collection PubMed
description Background: In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring MET mutations, MET-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been proven to achieve a good response. However, the relative efficacy of different therapeutics in primary NSCLC patients with MET amplification and the treatment options for patients harboring acquired MET amplification after the failure of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-TKIs remain unclear. Methods: In total, 33 patients harboring primary MET amplification and 9 patients harboring acquired MET alterations identified by next-generation sequencing were enrolled. A retrospective analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy of different therapeutics. In addition, studies reporting various treatments for patients harboring MET alterations were included in the meta-analysis. Results: In our cohort of patients harboring primary MET amplification, crizotinib displayed better efficacy than immunotherapy and chemotherapy, as demonstrated both in first-line (P = .0378) and second-line treatment regimens (P = .0181). The disease control rates for crizotinib, immunotherapy, and chemotherapy were 81.8%, 72.7%, and 63.6%, respectively. In particular, the median progression-free survival (PFS) time after immunotherapy in patients harboring MET amplification and high programed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (>50%) was only 77.5 days. The meta-analysis revealed that the median PFS times after crizotinib and immunotherapy were 4.57 and 2.94 months, respectively. In patients harboring acquired MET amplification, chemotherapy plus bevacizumab had superior efficacy (310.0 days vs 73.5 days, P = .0360) compared with MET-TKIs ± EGFR-TKIs. Conclusions: Immunotherapy showed a low response in patients harboring MET alterations, even those with concurrent high PD-L1 expression. MET-TKIs might be an optional treatment with worth-expecting efficacy. However, chemotherapy plus bevacizumab could benefit the subpopulation of patients harboring acquired MET amplification after the failure of EGFR-TKIs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9511535
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95115352022-09-27 Optimal Treatments for NSCLC Patients Harboring Primary or Acquired MET Amplification Sun, Dantong Tao, Junyan Yan, Weihua Zhu, Jingjuan Zhou, Hai Sheng, Yingying Xue, Chaofan Li, Hong Hou, Helei Technol Cancer Res Treat Original Article Background: In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring MET mutations, MET-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been proven to achieve a good response. However, the relative efficacy of different therapeutics in primary NSCLC patients with MET amplification and the treatment options for patients harboring acquired MET amplification after the failure of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-TKIs remain unclear. Methods: In total, 33 patients harboring primary MET amplification and 9 patients harboring acquired MET alterations identified by next-generation sequencing were enrolled. A retrospective analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy of different therapeutics. In addition, studies reporting various treatments for patients harboring MET alterations were included in the meta-analysis. Results: In our cohort of patients harboring primary MET amplification, crizotinib displayed better efficacy than immunotherapy and chemotherapy, as demonstrated both in first-line (P = .0378) and second-line treatment regimens (P = .0181). The disease control rates for crizotinib, immunotherapy, and chemotherapy were 81.8%, 72.7%, and 63.6%, respectively. In particular, the median progression-free survival (PFS) time after immunotherapy in patients harboring MET amplification and high programed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (>50%) was only 77.5 days. The meta-analysis revealed that the median PFS times after crizotinib and immunotherapy were 4.57 and 2.94 months, respectively. In patients harboring acquired MET amplification, chemotherapy plus bevacizumab had superior efficacy (310.0 days vs 73.5 days, P = .0360) compared with MET-TKIs ± EGFR-TKIs. Conclusions: Immunotherapy showed a low response in patients harboring MET alterations, even those with concurrent high PD-L1 expression. MET-TKIs might be an optional treatment with worth-expecting efficacy. However, chemotherapy plus bevacizumab could benefit the subpopulation of patients harboring acquired MET amplification after the failure of EGFR-TKIs. SAGE Publications 2022-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9511535/ /pubmed/36148917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338221128414 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Sun, Dantong
Tao, Junyan
Yan, Weihua
Zhu, Jingjuan
Zhou, Hai
Sheng, Yingying
Xue, Chaofan
Li, Hong
Hou, Helei
Optimal Treatments for NSCLC Patients Harboring Primary or Acquired MET Amplification
title Optimal Treatments for NSCLC Patients Harboring Primary or Acquired MET Amplification
title_full Optimal Treatments for NSCLC Patients Harboring Primary or Acquired MET Amplification
title_fullStr Optimal Treatments for NSCLC Patients Harboring Primary or Acquired MET Amplification
title_full_unstemmed Optimal Treatments for NSCLC Patients Harboring Primary or Acquired MET Amplification
title_short Optimal Treatments for NSCLC Patients Harboring Primary or Acquired MET Amplification
title_sort optimal treatments for nsclc patients harboring primary or acquired met amplification
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9511535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36148917
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338221128414
work_keys_str_mv AT sundantong optimaltreatmentsfornsclcpatientsharboringprimaryoracquiredmetamplification
AT taojunyan optimaltreatmentsfornsclcpatientsharboringprimaryoracquiredmetamplification
AT yanweihua optimaltreatmentsfornsclcpatientsharboringprimaryoracquiredmetamplification
AT zhujingjuan optimaltreatmentsfornsclcpatientsharboringprimaryoracquiredmetamplification
AT zhouhai optimaltreatmentsfornsclcpatientsharboringprimaryoracquiredmetamplification
AT shengyingying optimaltreatmentsfornsclcpatientsharboringprimaryoracquiredmetamplification
AT xuechaofan optimaltreatmentsfornsclcpatientsharboringprimaryoracquiredmetamplification
AT lihong optimaltreatmentsfornsclcpatientsharboringprimaryoracquiredmetamplification
AT houhelei optimaltreatmentsfornsclcpatientsharboringprimaryoracquiredmetamplification