Cargando…
Validity of the frame subtraction method in dynamic postural stability
BACKGROUND: The movement of targeted subjects can be calculated using the frame subtraction method. However, the validity of this evaluation method of dynamic postural stability has not been clarified yet. This study aimed to verify the validity of the evaluation method for jump landing using the fr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9511721/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36163189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-022-00570-7 |
_version_ | 1784797700327211008 |
---|---|
author | Ota, Megumi Tateuchi, Hiroshige Hashiguchi, Takaya Fujiwara, Karen Sasaki, Ayano Okumura, Kiseki Ichihashi, Noriaki |
author_facet | Ota, Megumi Tateuchi, Hiroshige Hashiguchi, Takaya Fujiwara, Karen Sasaki, Ayano Okumura, Kiseki Ichihashi, Noriaki |
author_sort | Ota, Megumi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The movement of targeted subjects can be calculated using the frame subtraction method. However, the validity of this evaluation method of dynamic postural stability has not been clarified yet. This study aimed to verify the validity of the evaluation method for jump landing using the frame subtraction score based on the ground reaction force (GRF). METHODS: Twenty subjects performed single-leg jump landing, and their dynamic postural stability index (DPSI), medial‒lateral stability index (MLSI), anterior‒posterior stability index, and vertical stability index (VSI) were calculated from the GRF. Simultaneously, motion images were captured using digital video cameras in the sagittal and frontal planes. After the motion images were analyzed using the frame subtraction method, the frame subtraction scores in the frontal, sagittal, and combined planes were calculated. To confirm its validity, the relationship between the frame subtraction scores and GRF parameters was investigated using Pearson's correlation analysis. RESULTS: The frame subtraction scores in the frontal and combined planes were significantly correlated with the DPSI, MLSI, and VSI (r = 0.46–0.75, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Therefore, the frame subtraction method could be applied to the evaluation of dynamic postural stability. Markerless systems are deemed useful in clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9511721 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95117212022-09-27 Validity of the frame subtraction method in dynamic postural stability Ota, Megumi Tateuchi, Hiroshige Hashiguchi, Takaya Fujiwara, Karen Sasaki, Ayano Okumura, Kiseki Ichihashi, Noriaki BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: The movement of targeted subjects can be calculated using the frame subtraction method. However, the validity of this evaluation method of dynamic postural stability has not been clarified yet. This study aimed to verify the validity of the evaluation method for jump landing using the frame subtraction score based on the ground reaction force (GRF). METHODS: Twenty subjects performed single-leg jump landing, and their dynamic postural stability index (DPSI), medial‒lateral stability index (MLSI), anterior‒posterior stability index, and vertical stability index (VSI) were calculated from the GRF. Simultaneously, motion images were captured using digital video cameras in the sagittal and frontal planes. After the motion images were analyzed using the frame subtraction method, the frame subtraction scores in the frontal, sagittal, and combined planes were calculated. To confirm its validity, the relationship between the frame subtraction scores and GRF parameters was investigated using Pearson's correlation analysis. RESULTS: The frame subtraction scores in the frontal and combined planes were significantly correlated with the DPSI, MLSI, and VSI (r = 0.46–0.75, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Therefore, the frame subtraction method could be applied to the evaluation of dynamic postural stability. Markerless systems are deemed useful in clinical practice. BioMed Central 2022-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9511721/ /pubmed/36163189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-022-00570-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Ota, Megumi Tateuchi, Hiroshige Hashiguchi, Takaya Fujiwara, Karen Sasaki, Ayano Okumura, Kiseki Ichihashi, Noriaki Validity of the frame subtraction method in dynamic postural stability |
title | Validity of the frame subtraction method in dynamic postural stability |
title_full | Validity of the frame subtraction method in dynamic postural stability |
title_fullStr | Validity of the frame subtraction method in dynamic postural stability |
title_full_unstemmed | Validity of the frame subtraction method in dynamic postural stability |
title_short | Validity of the frame subtraction method in dynamic postural stability |
title_sort | validity of the frame subtraction method in dynamic postural stability |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9511721/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36163189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-022-00570-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT otamegumi validityoftheframesubtractionmethodindynamicposturalstability AT tateuchihiroshige validityoftheframesubtractionmethodindynamicposturalstability AT hashiguchitakaya validityoftheframesubtractionmethodindynamicposturalstability AT fujiwarakaren validityoftheframesubtractionmethodindynamicposturalstability AT sasakiayano validityoftheframesubtractionmethodindynamicposturalstability AT okumurakiseki validityoftheframesubtractionmethodindynamicposturalstability AT ichihashinoriaki validityoftheframesubtractionmethodindynamicposturalstability |