Cargando…

A cost-effectiveness analysis of capecitabine maintenance therapy versus routine follow-up for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer patients after standard treatment from a perspective of Chinese society

BACKGROUND: Capecitabine maintenance therapy is safe and efficacious for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients, but the cost-effectiveness of its long-term use has not been investigated. Here, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of capecitabine maintenance therapy, compared with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Ji-Bin, Lin, Zhuo-Chen, Wong, Martin C. S., Wang, Harry H. X., Li, Mengmeng, Li, Su
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9511760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36156186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02516-9
_version_ 1784797708446334976
author Li, Ji-Bin
Lin, Zhuo-Chen
Wong, Martin C. S.
Wang, Harry H. X.
Li, Mengmeng
Li, Su
author_facet Li, Ji-Bin
Lin, Zhuo-Chen
Wong, Martin C. S.
Wang, Harry H. X.
Li, Mengmeng
Li, Su
author_sort Li, Ji-Bin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Capecitabine maintenance therapy is safe and efficacious for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients, but the cost-effectiveness of its long-term use has not been investigated. Here, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of capecitabine maintenance therapy, compared with routine follow-up, in early-stage TNBC patients after standard treatment from a perspective of Chinese society. METHODS: A three-state Markov model based on the data from the SYSUCC-001 trial was constructed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of capecitabine maintenance therapy in a month cycle over a period of 30-year time horizon. A 5% annual discount rate was set for all costs and benefits. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to explore the model uncertainties. The main outcomes include quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), and the number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one additional event. RESULTS: Compared with routine follow-up, 1-year capecitabine maintenance therapy yielded an additional 1.29 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) at an additional cost of $3391.70, with an ICER of $2630.53 (95% CI: $1159.81–$5090.12) per QALY gained. The ICER was considerably lower than the recommended willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold (i.e., $28,130.00 per QALY). The results were sensitive to the discount rate, drug cost, and treatment cost after relapse. Further, the NNT to prevent one additional relapse case was 29.2 (95% CI: 13.2–196.6), 16.7 (95% CI: 8.4–111.6), and 12.0 (95% CI: 5.7–82.6) at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: One-year capecitabine maintenance therapy for early-stage TNBC after standard treatment, compared with routine follow-up, was found to be highly cost-effective with promising clinical benefits and acceptable increased costs. Real-world studies are warranted to validate our findings in the future. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12916-022-02516-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9511760
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95117602022-09-27 A cost-effectiveness analysis of capecitabine maintenance therapy versus routine follow-up for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer patients after standard treatment from a perspective of Chinese society Li, Ji-Bin Lin, Zhuo-Chen Wong, Martin C. S. Wang, Harry H. X. Li, Mengmeng Li, Su BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Capecitabine maintenance therapy is safe and efficacious for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients, but the cost-effectiveness of its long-term use has not been investigated. Here, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of capecitabine maintenance therapy, compared with routine follow-up, in early-stage TNBC patients after standard treatment from a perspective of Chinese society. METHODS: A three-state Markov model based on the data from the SYSUCC-001 trial was constructed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of capecitabine maintenance therapy in a month cycle over a period of 30-year time horizon. A 5% annual discount rate was set for all costs and benefits. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to explore the model uncertainties. The main outcomes include quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), and the number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one additional event. RESULTS: Compared with routine follow-up, 1-year capecitabine maintenance therapy yielded an additional 1.29 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) at an additional cost of $3391.70, with an ICER of $2630.53 (95% CI: $1159.81–$5090.12) per QALY gained. The ICER was considerably lower than the recommended willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold (i.e., $28,130.00 per QALY). The results were sensitive to the discount rate, drug cost, and treatment cost after relapse. Further, the NNT to prevent one additional relapse case was 29.2 (95% CI: 13.2–196.6), 16.7 (95% CI: 8.4–111.6), and 12.0 (95% CI: 5.7–82.6) at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: One-year capecitabine maintenance therapy for early-stage TNBC after standard treatment, compared with routine follow-up, was found to be highly cost-effective with promising clinical benefits and acceptable increased costs. Real-world studies are warranted to validate our findings in the future. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12916-022-02516-9. BioMed Central 2022-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9511760/ /pubmed/36156186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02516-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Ji-Bin
Lin, Zhuo-Chen
Wong, Martin C. S.
Wang, Harry H. X.
Li, Mengmeng
Li, Su
A cost-effectiveness analysis of capecitabine maintenance therapy versus routine follow-up for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer patients after standard treatment from a perspective of Chinese society
title A cost-effectiveness analysis of capecitabine maintenance therapy versus routine follow-up for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer patients after standard treatment from a perspective of Chinese society
title_full A cost-effectiveness analysis of capecitabine maintenance therapy versus routine follow-up for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer patients after standard treatment from a perspective of Chinese society
title_fullStr A cost-effectiveness analysis of capecitabine maintenance therapy versus routine follow-up for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer patients after standard treatment from a perspective of Chinese society
title_full_unstemmed A cost-effectiveness analysis of capecitabine maintenance therapy versus routine follow-up for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer patients after standard treatment from a perspective of Chinese society
title_short A cost-effectiveness analysis of capecitabine maintenance therapy versus routine follow-up for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer patients after standard treatment from a perspective of Chinese society
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of capecitabine maintenance therapy versus routine follow-up for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer patients after standard treatment from a perspective of chinese society
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9511760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36156186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02516-9
work_keys_str_mv AT lijibin acosteffectivenessanalysisofcapecitabinemaintenancetherapyversusroutinefollowupforearlystagetriplenegativebreastcancerpatientsafterstandardtreatmentfromaperspectiveofchinesesociety
AT linzhuochen acosteffectivenessanalysisofcapecitabinemaintenancetherapyversusroutinefollowupforearlystagetriplenegativebreastcancerpatientsafterstandardtreatmentfromaperspectiveofchinesesociety
AT wongmartincs acosteffectivenessanalysisofcapecitabinemaintenancetherapyversusroutinefollowupforearlystagetriplenegativebreastcancerpatientsafterstandardtreatmentfromaperspectiveofchinesesociety
AT wangharryhx acosteffectivenessanalysisofcapecitabinemaintenancetherapyversusroutinefollowupforearlystagetriplenegativebreastcancerpatientsafterstandardtreatmentfromaperspectiveofchinesesociety
AT limengmeng acosteffectivenessanalysisofcapecitabinemaintenancetherapyversusroutinefollowupforearlystagetriplenegativebreastcancerpatientsafterstandardtreatmentfromaperspectiveofchinesesociety
AT lisu acosteffectivenessanalysisofcapecitabinemaintenancetherapyversusroutinefollowupforearlystagetriplenegativebreastcancerpatientsafterstandardtreatmentfromaperspectiveofchinesesociety
AT lijibin costeffectivenessanalysisofcapecitabinemaintenancetherapyversusroutinefollowupforearlystagetriplenegativebreastcancerpatientsafterstandardtreatmentfromaperspectiveofchinesesociety
AT linzhuochen costeffectivenessanalysisofcapecitabinemaintenancetherapyversusroutinefollowupforearlystagetriplenegativebreastcancerpatientsafterstandardtreatmentfromaperspectiveofchinesesociety
AT wongmartincs costeffectivenessanalysisofcapecitabinemaintenancetherapyversusroutinefollowupforearlystagetriplenegativebreastcancerpatientsafterstandardtreatmentfromaperspectiveofchinesesociety
AT wangharryhx costeffectivenessanalysisofcapecitabinemaintenancetherapyversusroutinefollowupforearlystagetriplenegativebreastcancerpatientsafterstandardtreatmentfromaperspectiveofchinesesociety
AT limengmeng costeffectivenessanalysisofcapecitabinemaintenancetherapyversusroutinefollowupforearlystagetriplenegativebreastcancerpatientsafterstandardtreatmentfromaperspectiveofchinesesociety
AT lisu costeffectivenessanalysisofcapecitabinemaintenancetherapyversusroutinefollowupforearlystagetriplenegativebreastcancerpatientsafterstandardtreatmentfromaperspectiveofchinesesociety