Cargando…

Rethinking Benefits in Health Research, Reflections of an Ethics Committee

The principle of beneficence in health research implies the effort of researchers to minimize risk to participants and maximize benefits to participants and society, which could be considered an abstract definition. Therefore, the benefits are not easily conceived by researchers who fail to achieve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mondragón Barrios, Liliana, Martínez Levy, Gabriela Ariadna, Díaz-Anzaldúa, Adriana, Estrada Camarena, Erika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: YJBM 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9511940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36187414
_version_ 1784797748215676928
author Mondragón Barrios, Liliana
Martínez Levy, Gabriela Ariadna
Díaz-Anzaldúa, Adriana
Estrada Camarena, Erika
author_facet Mondragón Barrios, Liliana
Martínez Levy, Gabriela Ariadna
Díaz-Anzaldúa, Adriana
Estrada Camarena, Erika
author_sort Mondragón Barrios, Liliana
collection PubMed
description The principle of beneficence in health research implies the effort of researchers to minimize risk to participants and maximize benefits to participants and society, which could be considered an abstract definition. Therefore, the benefits are not easily conceived by researchers who fail to achieve their goal, which is to privilege the well-being of participants. The purpose of this work was to describe and discuss the theoretical elements that support the principle of beneficence so that their knowledge allows designing and granting adequate benefits to participants. The present document defines the principle of beneficence. It also analyzes the maximization of benefits, the distinctions between different classifications of benefits, and the differentiation from compensations or incentives. With all this information, researchers must do a critical deliberation to select adequate benefits for participants of their studies, considering the type of study, potential participants, probability of risk, among others. These benefits should not be understood as a charity that researchers grant to the participant; they should be conceived as any form of action in favor of the well-being of participants. Participants must always be considered as moral agents, responsible for deciding whether the benefits would outweigh the possible negative unintended consequences of a particular study. Finally, no risk should be taken if it is not commensurate or proportional to the benefit of the research study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9511940
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher YJBM
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95119402022-09-30 Rethinking Benefits in Health Research, Reflections of an Ethics Committee Mondragón Barrios, Liliana Martínez Levy, Gabriela Ariadna Díaz-Anzaldúa, Adriana Estrada Camarena, Erika Yale J Biol Med Perspectives The principle of beneficence in health research implies the effort of researchers to minimize risk to participants and maximize benefits to participants and society, which could be considered an abstract definition. Therefore, the benefits are not easily conceived by researchers who fail to achieve their goal, which is to privilege the well-being of participants. The purpose of this work was to describe and discuss the theoretical elements that support the principle of beneficence so that their knowledge allows designing and granting adequate benefits to participants. The present document defines the principle of beneficence. It also analyzes the maximization of benefits, the distinctions between different classifications of benefits, and the differentiation from compensations or incentives. With all this information, researchers must do a critical deliberation to select adequate benefits for participants of their studies, considering the type of study, potential participants, probability of risk, among others. These benefits should not be understood as a charity that researchers grant to the participant; they should be conceived as any form of action in favor of the well-being of participants. Participants must always be considered as moral agents, responsible for deciding whether the benefits would outweigh the possible negative unintended consequences of a particular study. Finally, no risk should be taken if it is not commensurate or proportional to the benefit of the research study. YJBM 2022-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9511940/ /pubmed/36187414 Text en Copyright ©2022, Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY-NC license, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Perspectives
Mondragón Barrios, Liliana
Martínez Levy, Gabriela Ariadna
Díaz-Anzaldúa, Adriana
Estrada Camarena, Erika
Rethinking Benefits in Health Research, Reflections of an Ethics Committee
title Rethinking Benefits in Health Research, Reflections of an Ethics Committee
title_full Rethinking Benefits in Health Research, Reflections of an Ethics Committee
title_fullStr Rethinking Benefits in Health Research, Reflections of an Ethics Committee
title_full_unstemmed Rethinking Benefits in Health Research, Reflections of an Ethics Committee
title_short Rethinking Benefits in Health Research, Reflections of an Ethics Committee
title_sort rethinking benefits in health research, reflections of an ethics committee
topic Perspectives
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9511940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36187414
work_keys_str_mv AT mondragonbarriosliliana rethinkingbenefitsinhealthresearchreflectionsofanethicscommittee
AT martinezlevygabrielaariadna rethinkingbenefitsinhealthresearchreflectionsofanethicscommittee
AT diazanzalduaadriana rethinkingbenefitsinhealthresearchreflectionsofanethicscommittee
AT estradacamarenaerika rethinkingbenefitsinhealthresearchreflectionsofanethicscommittee