Cargando…

Building a neurocognitive profile of suicidal risk in severe mental disorders

BACKGROUND: Research on the influence of neurocognitive factors on suicide risk, regardless of the diagnosis, is inconsistent. Recently, suicide risk studies propose applying a trans-diagnostic framework in line with the launch of the Research Domain Criteria Cognitive Systems model. In the present...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Comparelli, Anna, Corigliano, Valentina, Montalbani, Benedetta, Nardella, Adele, De Carolis, Antonella, Stampatore, Lorenzo, Bargagna, Paride, Forcina, Francesca, Lamis, Dorian, Pompili, Maurizio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9511976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36162995
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04240-3
_version_ 1784797754950680576
author Comparelli, Anna
Corigliano, Valentina
Montalbani, Benedetta
Nardella, Adele
De Carolis, Antonella
Stampatore, Lorenzo
Bargagna, Paride
Forcina, Francesca
Lamis, Dorian
Pompili, Maurizio
author_facet Comparelli, Anna
Corigliano, Valentina
Montalbani, Benedetta
Nardella, Adele
De Carolis, Antonella
Stampatore, Lorenzo
Bargagna, Paride
Forcina, Francesca
Lamis, Dorian
Pompili, Maurizio
author_sort Comparelli, Anna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Research on the influence of neurocognitive factors on suicide risk, regardless of the diagnosis, is inconsistent. Recently, suicide risk studies propose applying a trans-diagnostic framework in line with the launch of the Research Domain Criteria Cognitive Systems model. In the present study, we highlight the extent of cognitive impairment using a standardized battery in a psychiatric sample stratified for different degrees of suicidal risk. We also differentiate in our sample various neurocognitive profiles associated with different levels of risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We divided a sample of 106 subjects into three groups stratified by suicide risk level: Suicide Attempt (SA), Suicidal Ideation (SI), Patient Controls (PC) and Healthy Controls (HC). We conducted a multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) for each cognitive domain measured through the standardized battery MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB). RESULTS: We found that the group of patients performed worse than the group of healthy controls on most domains; social cognition was impaired in the suicide risk groups compared both to HC and PC. Patients in the SA group performed worse than those in the SI group. CONCLUSION: Social cognition impairment may play a crucial role in suicidality among individuals diagnosed with serious mental illness as it is involved in both SI and SA; noteworthy, it is more compromised in the SA group fitting as a marker of risk severity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9511976
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95119762022-09-27 Building a neurocognitive profile of suicidal risk in severe mental disorders Comparelli, Anna Corigliano, Valentina Montalbani, Benedetta Nardella, Adele De Carolis, Antonella Stampatore, Lorenzo Bargagna, Paride Forcina, Francesca Lamis, Dorian Pompili, Maurizio BMC Psychiatry Research BACKGROUND: Research on the influence of neurocognitive factors on suicide risk, regardless of the diagnosis, is inconsistent. Recently, suicide risk studies propose applying a trans-diagnostic framework in line with the launch of the Research Domain Criteria Cognitive Systems model. In the present study, we highlight the extent of cognitive impairment using a standardized battery in a psychiatric sample stratified for different degrees of suicidal risk. We also differentiate in our sample various neurocognitive profiles associated with different levels of risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We divided a sample of 106 subjects into three groups stratified by suicide risk level: Suicide Attempt (SA), Suicidal Ideation (SI), Patient Controls (PC) and Healthy Controls (HC). We conducted a multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) for each cognitive domain measured through the standardized battery MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB). RESULTS: We found that the group of patients performed worse than the group of healthy controls on most domains; social cognition was impaired in the suicide risk groups compared both to HC and PC. Patients in the SA group performed worse than those in the SI group. CONCLUSION: Social cognition impairment may play a crucial role in suicidality among individuals diagnosed with serious mental illness as it is involved in both SI and SA; noteworthy, it is more compromised in the SA group fitting as a marker of risk severity. BioMed Central 2022-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9511976/ /pubmed/36162995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04240-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Comparelli, Anna
Corigliano, Valentina
Montalbani, Benedetta
Nardella, Adele
De Carolis, Antonella
Stampatore, Lorenzo
Bargagna, Paride
Forcina, Francesca
Lamis, Dorian
Pompili, Maurizio
Building a neurocognitive profile of suicidal risk in severe mental disorders
title Building a neurocognitive profile of suicidal risk in severe mental disorders
title_full Building a neurocognitive profile of suicidal risk in severe mental disorders
title_fullStr Building a neurocognitive profile of suicidal risk in severe mental disorders
title_full_unstemmed Building a neurocognitive profile of suicidal risk in severe mental disorders
title_short Building a neurocognitive profile of suicidal risk in severe mental disorders
title_sort building a neurocognitive profile of suicidal risk in severe mental disorders
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9511976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36162995
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04240-3
work_keys_str_mv AT comparellianna buildinganeurocognitiveprofileofsuicidalriskinseverementaldisorders
AT coriglianovalentina buildinganeurocognitiveprofileofsuicidalriskinseverementaldisorders
AT montalbanibenedetta buildinganeurocognitiveprofileofsuicidalriskinseverementaldisorders
AT nardellaadele buildinganeurocognitiveprofileofsuicidalriskinseverementaldisorders
AT decarolisantonella buildinganeurocognitiveprofileofsuicidalriskinseverementaldisorders
AT stampatorelorenzo buildinganeurocognitiveprofileofsuicidalriskinseverementaldisorders
AT bargagnaparide buildinganeurocognitiveprofileofsuicidalriskinseverementaldisorders
AT forcinafrancesca buildinganeurocognitiveprofileofsuicidalriskinseverementaldisorders
AT lamisdorian buildinganeurocognitiveprofileofsuicidalriskinseverementaldisorders
AT pompilimaurizio buildinganeurocognitiveprofileofsuicidalriskinseverementaldisorders