Cargando…

Trends and outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention during the COVID-19 pandemic in Michigan

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has severely impacted healthcare delivery and patient outcomes globally. AIMS: We aimed to evaluate the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the temporal trends and outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in Michigan. METHODS: We co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Azzalini, Lorenzo, Seth, Milan, Sukul, Devraj, Valle, Javier A., Daher, Edouard, Wanamaker, Brett, Tucciarone, Michael T., Zaitoun, Anwar, Madder, Ryan D., Gurm, Hitinder S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9512204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36156591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273638
_version_ 1784797801779036160
author Azzalini, Lorenzo
Seth, Milan
Sukul, Devraj
Valle, Javier A.
Daher, Edouard
Wanamaker, Brett
Tucciarone, Michael T.
Zaitoun, Anwar
Madder, Ryan D.
Gurm, Hitinder S.
author_facet Azzalini, Lorenzo
Seth, Milan
Sukul, Devraj
Valle, Javier A.
Daher, Edouard
Wanamaker, Brett
Tucciarone, Michael T.
Zaitoun, Anwar
Madder, Ryan D.
Gurm, Hitinder S.
author_sort Azzalini, Lorenzo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has severely impacted healthcare delivery and patient outcomes globally. AIMS: We aimed to evaluate the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the temporal trends and outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in Michigan. METHODS: We compared all patients undergoing PCI in the BMC2 Registry between March and December 2020 (“pandemic cohort”) with those undergoing PCI between March and December 2019 (“pre-pandemic cohort”). A risk-adjusted analysis of in-hospital outcomes was performed between the pre-pandemic and pandemic cohort. A subgroup analysis was performed comparing COVID-19 positive vs. negative patients during the pandemic. RESULTS: There was a 15.2% reduction in overall PCI volume from the pre-pandemic (n = 25,737) to the pandemic cohort (n = 21,822), which was more pronounced for stable angina and non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS) presentations, and between February and May 2020. Patients in the two cohorts had similar clinical and procedural characteristics. Monthly mortality rates for primary PCI were generally higher in the pandemic period. There were no significant system delays in care between the cohorts. Risk-adjusted mortality was higher in the pandemic cohort (aOR 1.26, 95% CI 1.07–1.47, p = 0.005), a finding that was only partially explained by worse outcomes in COVID-19 patients and was more pronounced in subjects with ACS. During the pandemic, COVID-19 positive patients suffered higher risk-adjusted mortality (aOR 5.69, 95% CI 2.54–12.74, p<0.001) compared with COVID negative patients. CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, we observed a reduction in PCI volumes and higher risk-adjusted mortality. COVID-19 positive patients experienced significantly worse outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9512204
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95122042022-09-27 Trends and outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention during the COVID-19 pandemic in Michigan Azzalini, Lorenzo Seth, Milan Sukul, Devraj Valle, Javier A. Daher, Edouard Wanamaker, Brett Tucciarone, Michael T. Zaitoun, Anwar Madder, Ryan D. Gurm, Hitinder S. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has severely impacted healthcare delivery and patient outcomes globally. AIMS: We aimed to evaluate the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the temporal trends and outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in Michigan. METHODS: We compared all patients undergoing PCI in the BMC2 Registry between March and December 2020 (“pandemic cohort”) with those undergoing PCI between March and December 2019 (“pre-pandemic cohort”). A risk-adjusted analysis of in-hospital outcomes was performed between the pre-pandemic and pandemic cohort. A subgroup analysis was performed comparing COVID-19 positive vs. negative patients during the pandemic. RESULTS: There was a 15.2% reduction in overall PCI volume from the pre-pandemic (n = 25,737) to the pandemic cohort (n = 21,822), which was more pronounced for stable angina and non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS) presentations, and between February and May 2020. Patients in the two cohorts had similar clinical and procedural characteristics. Monthly mortality rates for primary PCI were generally higher in the pandemic period. There were no significant system delays in care between the cohorts. Risk-adjusted mortality was higher in the pandemic cohort (aOR 1.26, 95% CI 1.07–1.47, p = 0.005), a finding that was only partially explained by worse outcomes in COVID-19 patients and was more pronounced in subjects with ACS. During the pandemic, COVID-19 positive patients suffered higher risk-adjusted mortality (aOR 5.69, 95% CI 2.54–12.74, p<0.001) compared with COVID negative patients. CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, we observed a reduction in PCI volumes and higher risk-adjusted mortality. COVID-19 positive patients experienced significantly worse outcomes. Public Library of Science 2022-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9512204/ /pubmed/36156591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273638 Text en © 2022 Azzalini et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Azzalini, Lorenzo
Seth, Milan
Sukul, Devraj
Valle, Javier A.
Daher, Edouard
Wanamaker, Brett
Tucciarone, Michael T.
Zaitoun, Anwar
Madder, Ryan D.
Gurm, Hitinder S.
Trends and outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention during the COVID-19 pandemic in Michigan
title Trends and outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention during the COVID-19 pandemic in Michigan
title_full Trends and outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention during the COVID-19 pandemic in Michigan
title_fullStr Trends and outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention during the COVID-19 pandemic in Michigan
title_full_unstemmed Trends and outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention during the COVID-19 pandemic in Michigan
title_short Trends and outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention during the COVID-19 pandemic in Michigan
title_sort trends and outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention during the covid-19 pandemic in michigan
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9512204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36156591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273638
work_keys_str_mv AT azzalinilorenzo trendsandoutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionduringthecovid19pandemicinmichigan
AT sethmilan trendsandoutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionduringthecovid19pandemicinmichigan
AT sukuldevraj trendsandoutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionduringthecovid19pandemicinmichigan
AT vallejaviera trendsandoutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionduringthecovid19pandemicinmichigan
AT daheredouard trendsandoutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionduringthecovid19pandemicinmichigan
AT wanamakerbrett trendsandoutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionduringthecovid19pandemicinmichigan
AT tucciaronemichaelt trendsandoutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionduringthecovid19pandemicinmichigan
AT zaitounanwar trendsandoutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionduringthecovid19pandemicinmichigan
AT madderryand trendsandoutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionduringthecovid19pandemicinmichigan
AT gurmhitinders trendsandoutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionduringthecovid19pandemicinmichigan