Cargando…
The influence of beam optics asymmetric distribution on dose in scanning carbon‐ion radiotherapy
PURPOSE: To quantify the influence of beam optics asymmetric distribution on dose. METHODS: Nine reference cubic targets and corresponding plans with modulation widths (M) of 3, 6, and 9 cm and with center depths (CDs) of 6, 12, and 24 cm were generated by the treatment planning system (TPS). The Mo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9512340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35635548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13656 |
_version_ | 1784797828765188096 |
---|---|
author | Dong, Sixue Zhang, Fuquan Schlegel, Nicki Wang, Weiwei Sun, Jiayao Sheng, Yinxiangzi Xia, Xiaobin |
author_facet | Dong, Sixue Zhang, Fuquan Schlegel, Nicki Wang, Weiwei Sun, Jiayao Sheng, Yinxiangzi Xia, Xiaobin |
author_sort | Dong, Sixue |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To quantify the influence of beam optics asymmetric distribution on dose. METHODS: Nine reference cubic targets and corresponding plans with modulation widths (M) of 3, 6, and 9 cm and with center depths (CDs) of 6, 12, and 24 cm were generated by the treatment planning system (TPS). The Monte Carlo code FLUKA was used for simulating the dose distribution from the aforementioned original plans and the dose perturbation by varying ±5%, ±15%, ±20%, ±25%, and ±40% in spot full width half maximum to the X‐direction while keeping consistent in the Y‐direction. The dosimetric comparisons in dose deviation, γ‐index analysis, lateral penumbra, and flatness were evaluated. RESULTS: The largest 3D absolute mean deviation was 15.0% ± 20.9% (mean ± standard deviation) in M3CD6, whereas with the variation from −15% to +20%, the values were below 5% for all cube plans. The lowest 2D γ‐index passing rate was 80.6% with criteria of 2%–2 mm by a +40% variation in M3CD6. For the M9CD24 with a −40% variation, the maximum 1D dose deviations were 5.6% and 15.7% in the high‐dose region and the edge of the radiation field, respectively. The maximum deviations of penumbra and flatness were 3.4 mm and 11.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The scenario of beam optics asymmetric showed relatively slight influence on the global dose distribution but severely affected dose on the edge of the radiation field. For scanning carbon‐ion therapy facilities, beam spot lateral profile settings in TPS base data should be properly handled when beam optics asymmetry variation is over 15%. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9512340 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95123402022-09-30 The influence of beam optics asymmetric distribution on dose in scanning carbon‐ion radiotherapy Dong, Sixue Zhang, Fuquan Schlegel, Nicki Wang, Weiwei Sun, Jiayao Sheng, Yinxiangzi Xia, Xiaobin J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: To quantify the influence of beam optics asymmetric distribution on dose. METHODS: Nine reference cubic targets and corresponding plans with modulation widths (M) of 3, 6, and 9 cm and with center depths (CDs) of 6, 12, and 24 cm were generated by the treatment planning system (TPS). The Monte Carlo code FLUKA was used for simulating the dose distribution from the aforementioned original plans and the dose perturbation by varying ±5%, ±15%, ±20%, ±25%, and ±40% in spot full width half maximum to the X‐direction while keeping consistent in the Y‐direction. The dosimetric comparisons in dose deviation, γ‐index analysis, lateral penumbra, and flatness were evaluated. RESULTS: The largest 3D absolute mean deviation was 15.0% ± 20.9% (mean ± standard deviation) in M3CD6, whereas with the variation from −15% to +20%, the values were below 5% for all cube plans. The lowest 2D γ‐index passing rate was 80.6% with criteria of 2%–2 mm by a +40% variation in M3CD6. For the M9CD24 with a −40% variation, the maximum 1D dose deviations were 5.6% and 15.7% in the high‐dose region and the edge of the radiation field, respectively. The maximum deviations of penumbra and flatness were 3.4 mm and 11.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The scenario of beam optics asymmetric showed relatively slight influence on the global dose distribution but severely affected dose on the edge of the radiation field. For scanning carbon‐ion therapy facilities, beam spot lateral profile settings in TPS base data should be properly handled when beam optics asymmetry variation is over 15%. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9512340/ /pubmed/35635548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13656 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Dong, Sixue Zhang, Fuquan Schlegel, Nicki Wang, Weiwei Sun, Jiayao Sheng, Yinxiangzi Xia, Xiaobin The influence of beam optics asymmetric distribution on dose in scanning carbon‐ion radiotherapy |
title | The influence of beam optics asymmetric distribution on dose in scanning carbon‐ion radiotherapy |
title_full | The influence of beam optics asymmetric distribution on dose in scanning carbon‐ion radiotherapy |
title_fullStr | The influence of beam optics asymmetric distribution on dose in scanning carbon‐ion radiotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | The influence of beam optics asymmetric distribution on dose in scanning carbon‐ion radiotherapy |
title_short | The influence of beam optics asymmetric distribution on dose in scanning carbon‐ion radiotherapy |
title_sort | influence of beam optics asymmetric distribution on dose in scanning carbon‐ion radiotherapy |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9512340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35635548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13656 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dongsixue theinfluenceofbeamopticsasymmetricdistributionondoseinscanningcarbonionradiotherapy AT zhangfuquan theinfluenceofbeamopticsasymmetricdistributionondoseinscanningcarbonionradiotherapy AT schlegelnicki theinfluenceofbeamopticsasymmetricdistributionondoseinscanningcarbonionradiotherapy AT wangweiwei theinfluenceofbeamopticsasymmetricdistributionondoseinscanningcarbonionradiotherapy AT sunjiayao theinfluenceofbeamopticsasymmetricdistributionondoseinscanningcarbonionradiotherapy AT shengyinxiangzi theinfluenceofbeamopticsasymmetricdistributionondoseinscanningcarbonionradiotherapy AT xiaxiaobin theinfluenceofbeamopticsasymmetricdistributionondoseinscanningcarbonionradiotherapy AT dongsixue influenceofbeamopticsasymmetricdistributionondoseinscanningcarbonionradiotherapy AT zhangfuquan influenceofbeamopticsasymmetricdistributionondoseinscanningcarbonionradiotherapy AT schlegelnicki influenceofbeamopticsasymmetricdistributionondoseinscanningcarbonionradiotherapy AT wangweiwei influenceofbeamopticsasymmetricdistributionondoseinscanningcarbonionradiotherapy AT sunjiayao influenceofbeamopticsasymmetricdistributionondoseinscanningcarbonionradiotherapy AT shengyinxiangzi influenceofbeamopticsasymmetricdistributionondoseinscanningcarbonionradiotherapy AT xiaxiaobin influenceofbeamopticsasymmetricdistributionondoseinscanningcarbonionradiotherapy |