Cargando…

The influence of beam optics asymmetric distribution on dose in scanning carbon‐ion radiotherapy

PURPOSE: To quantify the influence of beam optics asymmetric distribution on dose. METHODS: Nine reference cubic targets and corresponding plans with modulation widths (M) of 3, 6, and 9 cm and with center depths (CDs) of 6, 12, and 24 cm were generated by the treatment planning system (TPS). The Mo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dong, Sixue, Zhang, Fuquan, Schlegel, Nicki, Wang, Weiwei, Sun, Jiayao, Sheng, Yinxiangzi, Xia, Xiaobin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9512340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35635548
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13656
_version_ 1784797828765188096
author Dong, Sixue
Zhang, Fuquan
Schlegel, Nicki
Wang, Weiwei
Sun, Jiayao
Sheng, Yinxiangzi
Xia, Xiaobin
author_facet Dong, Sixue
Zhang, Fuquan
Schlegel, Nicki
Wang, Weiwei
Sun, Jiayao
Sheng, Yinxiangzi
Xia, Xiaobin
author_sort Dong, Sixue
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To quantify the influence of beam optics asymmetric distribution on dose. METHODS: Nine reference cubic targets and corresponding plans with modulation widths (M) of 3, 6, and 9 cm and with center depths (CDs) of 6, 12, and 24 cm were generated by the treatment planning system (TPS). The Monte Carlo code FLUKA was used for simulating the dose distribution from the aforementioned original plans and the dose perturbation by varying ±5%, ±15%, ±20%, ±25%, and ±40% in spot full width half maximum to the X‐direction while keeping consistent in the Y‐direction. The dosimetric comparisons in dose deviation, γ‐index analysis, lateral penumbra, and flatness were evaluated. RESULTS: The largest 3D absolute mean deviation was 15.0% ± 20.9% (mean ± standard deviation) in M3CD6, whereas with the variation from −15% to +20%, the values were below 5% for all cube plans. The lowest 2D γ‐index passing rate was 80.6% with criteria of 2%–2 mm by a +40% variation in M3CD6. For the M9CD24 with a −40% variation, the maximum 1D dose deviations were 5.6% and 15.7% in the high‐dose region and the edge of the radiation field, respectively. The maximum deviations of penumbra and flatness were 3.4 mm and 11.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The scenario of beam optics asymmetric showed relatively slight influence on the global dose distribution but severely affected dose on the edge of the radiation field. For scanning carbon‐ion therapy facilities, beam spot lateral profile settings in TPS base data should be properly handled when beam optics asymmetry variation is over 15%.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9512340
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95123402022-09-30 The influence of beam optics asymmetric distribution on dose in scanning carbon‐ion radiotherapy Dong, Sixue Zhang, Fuquan Schlegel, Nicki Wang, Weiwei Sun, Jiayao Sheng, Yinxiangzi Xia, Xiaobin J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: To quantify the influence of beam optics asymmetric distribution on dose. METHODS: Nine reference cubic targets and corresponding plans with modulation widths (M) of 3, 6, and 9 cm and with center depths (CDs) of 6, 12, and 24 cm were generated by the treatment planning system (TPS). The Monte Carlo code FLUKA was used for simulating the dose distribution from the aforementioned original plans and the dose perturbation by varying ±5%, ±15%, ±20%, ±25%, and ±40% in spot full width half maximum to the X‐direction while keeping consistent in the Y‐direction. The dosimetric comparisons in dose deviation, γ‐index analysis, lateral penumbra, and flatness were evaluated. RESULTS: The largest 3D absolute mean deviation was 15.0% ± 20.9% (mean ± standard deviation) in M3CD6, whereas with the variation from −15% to +20%, the values were below 5% for all cube plans. The lowest 2D γ‐index passing rate was 80.6% with criteria of 2%–2 mm by a +40% variation in M3CD6. For the M9CD24 with a −40% variation, the maximum 1D dose deviations were 5.6% and 15.7% in the high‐dose region and the edge of the radiation field, respectively. The maximum deviations of penumbra and flatness were 3.4 mm and 11.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The scenario of beam optics asymmetric showed relatively slight influence on the global dose distribution but severely affected dose on the edge of the radiation field. For scanning carbon‐ion therapy facilities, beam spot lateral profile settings in TPS base data should be properly handled when beam optics asymmetry variation is over 15%. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9512340/ /pubmed/35635548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13656 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Dong, Sixue
Zhang, Fuquan
Schlegel, Nicki
Wang, Weiwei
Sun, Jiayao
Sheng, Yinxiangzi
Xia, Xiaobin
The influence of beam optics asymmetric distribution on dose in scanning carbon‐ion radiotherapy
title The influence of beam optics asymmetric distribution on dose in scanning carbon‐ion radiotherapy
title_full The influence of beam optics asymmetric distribution on dose in scanning carbon‐ion radiotherapy
title_fullStr The influence of beam optics asymmetric distribution on dose in scanning carbon‐ion radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed The influence of beam optics asymmetric distribution on dose in scanning carbon‐ion radiotherapy
title_short The influence of beam optics asymmetric distribution on dose in scanning carbon‐ion radiotherapy
title_sort influence of beam optics asymmetric distribution on dose in scanning carbon‐ion radiotherapy
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9512340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35635548
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13656
work_keys_str_mv AT dongsixue theinfluenceofbeamopticsasymmetricdistributionondoseinscanningcarbonionradiotherapy
AT zhangfuquan theinfluenceofbeamopticsasymmetricdistributionondoseinscanningcarbonionradiotherapy
AT schlegelnicki theinfluenceofbeamopticsasymmetricdistributionondoseinscanningcarbonionradiotherapy
AT wangweiwei theinfluenceofbeamopticsasymmetricdistributionondoseinscanningcarbonionradiotherapy
AT sunjiayao theinfluenceofbeamopticsasymmetricdistributionondoseinscanningcarbonionradiotherapy
AT shengyinxiangzi theinfluenceofbeamopticsasymmetricdistributionondoseinscanningcarbonionradiotherapy
AT xiaxiaobin theinfluenceofbeamopticsasymmetricdistributionondoseinscanningcarbonionradiotherapy
AT dongsixue influenceofbeamopticsasymmetricdistributionondoseinscanningcarbonionradiotherapy
AT zhangfuquan influenceofbeamopticsasymmetricdistributionondoseinscanningcarbonionradiotherapy
AT schlegelnicki influenceofbeamopticsasymmetricdistributionondoseinscanningcarbonionradiotherapy
AT wangweiwei influenceofbeamopticsasymmetricdistributionondoseinscanningcarbonionradiotherapy
AT sunjiayao influenceofbeamopticsasymmetricdistributionondoseinscanningcarbonionradiotherapy
AT shengyinxiangzi influenceofbeamopticsasymmetricdistributionondoseinscanningcarbonionradiotherapy
AT xiaxiaobin influenceofbeamopticsasymmetricdistributionondoseinscanningcarbonionradiotherapy