Cargando…

Machine learning for contour classification in TG‐263 noncompliant databases

A large volume of medical data are labeled using nonstandardized nomenclature. Although efforts have been made by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) to standardize nomenclature through Task Group 263 (TG‐263), there remain noncompliant databases. This work aims to create an al...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Livermore, David, Trappenberg, Thomas, Syme, Alasdair
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9512347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35686988
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13662
_version_ 1784797830482755584
author Livermore, David
Trappenberg, Thomas
Syme, Alasdair
author_facet Livermore, David
Trappenberg, Thomas
Syme, Alasdair
author_sort Livermore, David
collection PubMed
description A large volume of medical data are labeled using nonstandardized nomenclature. Although efforts have been made by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) to standardize nomenclature through Task Group 263 (TG‐263), there remain noncompliant databases. This work aims to create an algorithm that can analyze anatomical contours in patients with head and neck cancer and classify them into TG‐263 compliant nomenclature. To create an accurate algorithm capable of such classification, a combined approaching using both binary images of individual slices of anatomical contours themselves, as well as center of mass coordinates of the structures are input into a neural network. The center of mass coordinates were scaled using two normalization schemes, a simple linear normalization scheme agnostic of the patient anatomy, and an anatomical normalization scheme dependent on patient anatomy. The results of all of the individual slice classifications are then aggregated into a single classification by means of a voting algorithm. The total classification accuracy of the final algorithms was 97.6% mean accuracy per class for nonanatomically normalization scheme, and 97.9% mean accuracy per class for anatomically normalization scheme. The total accuracy was 99.0% (13 errors in 1302 structures) for the nonanatomically normalization scheme, and 98.3% (22 errors in 1302 structures) for the anatomically normalization scheme.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9512347
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95123472022-09-30 Machine learning for contour classification in TG‐263 noncompliant databases Livermore, David Trappenberg, Thomas Syme, Alasdair J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics A large volume of medical data are labeled using nonstandardized nomenclature. Although efforts have been made by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) to standardize nomenclature through Task Group 263 (TG‐263), there remain noncompliant databases. This work aims to create an algorithm that can analyze anatomical contours in patients with head and neck cancer and classify them into TG‐263 compliant nomenclature. To create an accurate algorithm capable of such classification, a combined approaching using both binary images of individual slices of anatomical contours themselves, as well as center of mass coordinates of the structures are input into a neural network. The center of mass coordinates were scaled using two normalization schemes, a simple linear normalization scheme agnostic of the patient anatomy, and an anatomical normalization scheme dependent on patient anatomy. The results of all of the individual slice classifications are then aggregated into a single classification by means of a voting algorithm. The total classification accuracy of the final algorithms was 97.6% mean accuracy per class for nonanatomically normalization scheme, and 97.9% mean accuracy per class for anatomically normalization scheme. The total accuracy was 99.0% (13 errors in 1302 structures) for the nonanatomically normalization scheme, and 98.3% (22 errors in 1302 structures) for the anatomically normalization scheme. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9512347/ /pubmed/35686988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13662 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Livermore, David
Trappenberg, Thomas
Syme, Alasdair
Machine learning for contour classification in TG‐263 noncompliant databases
title Machine learning for contour classification in TG‐263 noncompliant databases
title_full Machine learning for contour classification in TG‐263 noncompliant databases
title_fullStr Machine learning for contour classification in TG‐263 noncompliant databases
title_full_unstemmed Machine learning for contour classification in TG‐263 noncompliant databases
title_short Machine learning for contour classification in TG‐263 noncompliant databases
title_sort machine learning for contour classification in tg‐263 noncompliant databases
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9512347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35686988
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13662
work_keys_str_mv AT livermoredavid machinelearningforcontourclassificationintg263noncompliantdatabases
AT trappenbergthomas machinelearningforcontourclassificationintg263noncompliantdatabases
AT symealasdair machinelearningforcontourclassificationintg263noncompliantdatabases