Cargando…
High frequency UV–Vis sensors estimate error in riverine dissolved organic carbon load estimates from grab sampling
High frequency ultraviolet – visible (UV–VIS) sensors offer a way of improving dissolved organic carbon (DOC) load estimates in rivers as they can be calibrated to DOC concentration. This is an improvement on periodic grab sampling, or the use of pumped sampling systems which store samples in-field...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9512721/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36163406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10515-9 |
_version_ | 1784797893614370816 |
---|---|
author | Ritson, J. P. Kennedy-Blundell, O. Croft, J. Templeton, M. R. Hawkins, C. E. Clark, J. M. Evans, M. G. Brazier, R. E. Smith, D. Graham, N. J. D. |
author_facet | Ritson, J. P. Kennedy-Blundell, O. Croft, J. Templeton, M. R. Hawkins, C. E. Clark, J. M. Evans, M. G. Brazier, R. E. Smith, D. Graham, N. J. D. |
author_sort | Ritson, J. P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | High frequency ultraviolet – visible (UV–VIS) sensors offer a way of improving dissolved organic carbon (DOC) load estimates in rivers as they can be calibrated to DOC concentration. This is an improvement on periodic grab sampling, or the use of pumped sampling systems which store samples in-field before collection. We hypothesised that the move to high frequency measurements would increase the load estimate based on grab sampling due to systemic under-sampling of high flows. To test our hypotheses, we calibrated two sensors in contrasting catchments (Exe and Bow Brook, UK) against weekly grab sampled DOC measurements and then created an hourly time series of DOC for the two sites. Taking this measurement as a ‘true’ value of DOC load, we simulated 1,000 grab sampling campaigns at weekly, fortnightly and monthly frequency to understand the likely distribution of load and error estimates. We also performed an analysis of daily grab samples collected using a pumped storage sampling system with weekly collection. Our results show that: a) grab sampling systemically underestimates DOC loads and gives positively skewed distributions of results, b) this under-estimation and positive skew decreases with increasing sampling frequency, c) commonly used estimates of error in the load value are also systemically lowered by the oversampling of low, stable flows due to their dependence on the variance in the flow-weighted mean concentration, and d) that pumped storage systems may lead to under-estimation of DOC and over estimation of specific ultra-violet absorbance (SUVA), a proxy for aromaticity, due to biodegradation during storage. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10661-022-10515-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9512721 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95127212022-09-27 High frequency UV–Vis sensors estimate error in riverine dissolved organic carbon load estimates from grab sampling Ritson, J. P. Kennedy-Blundell, O. Croft, J. Templeton, M. R. Hawkins, C. E. Clark, J. M. Evans, M. G. Brazier, R. E. Smith, D. Graham, N. J. D. Environ Monit Assess Article High frequency ultraviolet – visible (UV–VIS) sensors offer a way of improving dissolved organic carbon (DOC) load estimates in rivers as they can be calibrated to DOC concentration. This is an improvement on periodic grab sampling, or the use of pumped sampling systems which store samples in-field before collection. We hypothesised that the move to high frequency measurements would increase the load estimate based on grab sampling due to systemic under-sampling of high flows. To test our hypotheses, we calibrated two sensors in contrasting catchments (Exe and Bow Brook, UK) against weekly grab sampled DOC measurements and then created an hourly time series of DOC for the two sites. Taking this measurement as a ‘true’ value of DOC load, we simulated 1,000 grab sampling campaigns at weekly, fortnightly and monthly frequency to understand the likely distribution of load and error estimates. We also performed an analysis of daily grab samples collected using a pumped storage sampling system with weekly collection. Our results show that: a) grab sampling systemically underestimates DOC loads and gives positively skewed distributions of results, b) this under-estimation and positive skew decreases with increasing sampling frequency, c) commonly used estimates of error in the load value are also systemically lowered by the oversampling of low, stable flows due to their dependence on the variance in the flow-weighted mean concentration, and d) that pumped storage systems may lead to under-estimation of DOC and over estimation of specific ultra-violet absorbance (SUVA), a proxy for aromaticity, due to biodegradation during storage. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10661-022-10515-9. Springer International Publishing 2022-09-26 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9512721/ /pubmed/36163406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10515-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Ritson, J. P. Kennedy-Blundell, O. Croft, J. Templeton, M. R. Hawkins, C. E. Clark, J. M. Evans, M. G. Brazier, R. E. Smith, D. Graham, N. J. D. High frequency UV–Vis sensors estimate error in riverine dissolved organic carbon load estimates from grab sampling |
title | High frequency UV–Vis sensors estimate error in riverine dissolved organic carbon load estimates from grab sampling |
title_full | High frequency UV–Vis sensors estimate error in riverine dissolved organic carbon load estimates from grab sampling |
title_fullStr | High frequency UV–Vis sensors estimate error in riverine dissolved organic carbon load estimates from grab sampling |
title_full_unstemmed | High frequency UV–Vis sensors estimate error in riverine dissolved organic carbon load estimates from grab sampling |
title_short | High frequency UV–Vis sensors estimate error in riverine dissolved organic carbon load estimates from grab sampling |
title_sort | high frequency uv–vis sensors estimate error in riverine dissolved organic carbon load estimates from grab sampling |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9512721/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36163406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10515-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ritsonjp highfrequencyuvvissensorsestimateerrorinriverinedissolvedorganiccarbonloadestimatesfromgrabsampling AT kennedyblundello highfrequencyuvvissensorsestimateerrorinriverinedissolvedorganiccarbonloadestimatesfromgrabsampling AT croftj highfrequencyuvvissensorsestimateerrorinriverinedissolvedorganiccarbonloadestimatesfromgrabsampling AT templetonmr highfrequencyuvvissensorsestimateerrorinriverinedissolvedorganiccarbonloadestimatesfromgrabsampling AT hawkinsce highfrequencyuvvissensorsestimateerrorinriverinedissolvedorganiccarbonloadestimatesfromgrabsampling AT clarkjm highfrequencyuvvissensorsestimateerrorinriverinedissolvedorganiccarbonloadestimatesfromgrabsampling AT evansmg highfrequencyuvvissensorsestimateerrorinriverinedissolvedorganiccarbonloadestimatesfromgrabsampling AT brazierre highfrequencyuvvissensorsestimateerrorinriverinedissolvedorganiccarbonloadestimatesfromgrabsampling AT smithd highfrequencyuvvissensorsestimateerrorinriverinedissolvedorganiccarbonloadestimatesfromgrabsampling AT grahamnjd highfrequencyuvvissensorsestimateerrorinriverinedissolvedorganiccarbonloadestimatesfromgrabsampling |