Cargando…

Anwendbarkeit von QUIKS bei stationär konservativ behandelten Tumorpatienten

BACKGROUND: Quality improvement in conservative pain management (QUIKS), a module for nonoperative patients in the QUIPS project was tested on a cohort of tumor patients regarding its applicability. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Conservatively treated inpatients at the University Hospital of Würzburg (UKW)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roch, Carmen, Kress, Theresa, Erlenwein, Joachim, Meissner, Winfried, Brede, Elmar Marc, van Oorschot, Birgitt
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Medizin 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9512755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34705120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00482-021-00599-6
_version_ 1784797901315112960
author Roch, Carmen
Kress, Theresa
Erlenwein, Joachim
Meissner, Winfried
Brede, Elmar Marc
van Oorschot, Birgitt
author_facet Roch, Carmen
Kress, Theresa
Erlenwein, Joachim
Meissner, Winfried
Brede, Elmar Marc
van Oorschot, Birgitt
author_sort Roch, Carmen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Quality improvement in conservative pain management (QUIKS), a module for nonoperative patients in the QUIPS project was tested on a cohort of tumor patients regarding its applicability. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Conservatively treated inpatients at the University Hospital of Würzburg (UKW) were prospectively surveyed on the quality of pain management using the QUIKS outcome questionnaire (AZ 129/17, Ethics Committee at UKW). Information on therapy and demographics was taken from the hospital’s internal documentation system. RESULTS: During the data collection period 100 conservatively treated inhouse tumor patients from different hospitals were included. Of the patients 74% required assistance in answering the questionnaire. Functional limitations or pain treatment-related side effects were present in 77% of the patients; the average pain level was 6 on the numerical rating scale. The most commonly reported type of pain was back pain and headache. Of the patients 18% received pain therapy with opioids and 26% with nonopioids, adjustment was made in 5% with opioids and in 44% with nonopioids and pain medicine specialists were consulted in 9% of cases. CONCLUSION: The application of the questionnaire was well accepted by the patients but required a high level of assistance in completing it. A high level of pain was observed during the hospital stay and the adjustment of pain therapy or the involvement of pain medicine specialists was rare. The interpretation of statements regarding the quality of tumor pain may be limited as other (pre-existing) pain entities, such as nontumor-associated pain or chronic tumor pain could not be clearly delineated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9512755
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Medizin
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95127552022-09-28 Anwendbarkeit von QUIKS bei stationär konservativ behandelten Tumorpatienten Roch, Carmen Kress, Theresa Erlenwein, Joachim Meissner, Winfried Brede, Elmar Marc van Oorschot, Birgitt Schmerz Originalien BACKGROUND: Quality improvement in conservative pain management (QUIKS), a module for nonoperative patients in the QUIPS project was tested on a cohort of tumor patients regarding its applicability. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Conservatively treated inpatients at the University Hospital of Würzburg (UKW) were prospectively surveyed on the quality of pain management using the QUIKS outcome questionnaire (AZ 129/17, Ethics Committee at UKW). Information on therapy and demographics was taken from the hospital’s internal documentation system. RESULTS: During the data collection period 100 conservatively treated inhouse tumor patients from different hospitals were included. Of the patients 74% required assistance in answering the questionnaire. Functional limitations or pain treatment-related side effects were present in 77% of the patients; the average pain level was 6 on the numerical rating scale. The most commonly reported type of pain was back pain and headache. Of the patients 18% received pain therapy with opioids and 26% with nonopioids, adjustment was made in 5% with opioids and in 44% with nonopioids and pain medicine specialists were consulted in 9% of cases. CONCLUSION: The application of the questionnaire was well accepted by the patients but required a high level of assistance in completing it. A high level of pain was observed during the hospital stay and the adjustment of pain therapy or the involvement of pain medicine specialists was rare. The interpretation of statements regarding the quality of tumor pain may be limited as other (pre-existing) pain entities, such as nontumor-associated pain or chronic tumor pain could not be clearly delineated. Springer Medizin 2021-10-27 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9512755/ /pubmed/34705120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00482-021-00599-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access Dieser Artikel wird unter der Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Lizenz veröffentlicht, welche die Nutzung, Vervielfältigung, Bearbeitung, Verbreitung und Wiedergabe in jeglichem Medium und Format erlaubt, sofern Sie den/die ursprünglichen Autor(en) und die Quelle ordnungsgemäß nennen, einen Link zur Creative Commons Lizenz beifügen und angeben, ob Änderungen vorgenommen wurden. Die in diesem Artikel enthaltenen Bilder und sonstiges Drittmaterial unterliegen ebenfalls der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz, sofern sich aus der Abbildungslegende nichts anderes ergibt. Sofern das betreffende Material nicht unter der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz steht und die betreffende Handlung nicht nach gesetzlichen Vorschriften erlaubt ist, ist für die oben aufgeführten Weiterverwendungen des Materials die Einwilligung des jeweiligen Rechteinhabers einzuholen. Weitere Details zur Lizenz entnehmen Sie bitte der Lizenzinformation auf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Originalien
Roch, Carmen
Kress, Theresa
Erlenwein, Joachim
Meissner, Winfried
Brede, Elmar Marc
van Oorschot, Birgitt
Anwendbarkeit von QUIKS bei stationär konservativ behandelten Tumorpatienten
title Anwendbarkeit von QUIKS bei stationär konservativ behandelten Tumorpatienten
title_full Anwendbarkeit von QUIKS bei stationär konservativ behandelten Tumorpatienten
title_fullStr Anwendbarkeit von QUIKS bei stationär konservativ behandelten Tumorpatienten
title_full_unstemmed Anwendbarkeit von QUIKS bei stationär konservativ behandelten Tumorpatienten
title_short Anwendbarkeit von QUIKS bei stationär konservativ behandelten Tumorpatienten
title_sort anwendbarkeit von quiks bei stationär konservativ behandelten tumorpatienten
topic Originalien
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9512755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34705120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00482-021-00599-6
work_keys_str_mv AT rochcarmen anwendbarkeitvonquiksbeistationarkonservativbehandeltentumorpatienten
AT kresstheresa anwendbarkeitvonquiksbeistationarkonservativbehandeltentumorpatienten
AT erlenweinjoachim anwendbarkeitvonquiksbeistationarkonservativbehandeltentumorpatienten
AT meissnerwinfried anwendbarkeitvonquiksbeistationarkonservativbehandeltentumorpatienten
AT bredeelmarmarc anwendbarkeitvonquiksbeistationarkonservativbehandeltentumorpatienten
AT vanoorschotbirgitt anwendbarkeitvonquiksbeistationarkonservativbehandeltentumorpatienten